Arch btw... (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
 

top 73 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 54 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I choose a distro based on the name and logo. If the distro doesn't feel cool anymore, I switch.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 66 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    I get that people like things to be easier, but honestly, Arch's installation process is so streamlined these days that I don't see that as the selling point. However, if it provides a better driver experience, then that's cool. Simply not something I need.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [โ€“] 55 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    EOS provides some more QoL features, itโ€™s not just the installation itself (a button to update mirrors, auto keyring update, some nice pre-installed things like yay, etc)

    If you need an Arch installation ready to go out of the box, EOS is a solid choice.

    Edit: not trying to convince you to jump to EOS, just providing a bit more context about the distro

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 18 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Yeah, that's cool. For me, the beauty of Arch is how naked it is when I install it. It's like "least priveleges" but for my workstation. I only add the crap I want. No more, no less.

    I cut my teeth on FreeBSD 2.2.1 way back in '97 or whenever the hell that came out. Suffice it to say, that OS was naked as hell. Arch feels like coming home to me in a strange way, even though BSD is still solid. Linux is a much better workstation that BSD these days.

    edit: perhaps I'm something of a masochist. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    archinstall straight up could not deal with the partition setup I wanted, EOS installed without problems. Something about installing btrfs with multiple subvolumes next to Windows on the same drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I have used both Arch and Eos. I use a special tiling wm, and I have Nvidia. Form Arch I have to install everything I need, from Eos I just select install without a wm/dm remove some bloat and install the missing. Almost the same outcome, almost the same time to set up. So it does not matter (for me).

    Out of the box Eos provieds ease, Arch provides knowledge (along the way). I have friends which are tech savy enough to daily drive Eos, but unintrested to learn how the linux ecosystem works by installing Arch (at least until a bug forces them to read the wiki)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 21 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Does this work for cachyOS too?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 49 points 10 months ago (20 children)

    I tried running Bazzite for a few months, but just kept running into one weird issue after another. Went to Endeavor and they all went away overnight.

    Iโ€™m technical enough that I can configure Arch from scratch, but simply canโ€™t be bothered. I just need my computer to work. Every day.

    I felt like when I was working with Arch, and Iโ€™m sure itโ€™s operator error, it was like maintaining a starship with a dozen systems that could individually go wrong and I was responsible for all of them. Endeavor was fully setup with no weirdness in less than 30 minutes.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [โ€“] 17 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Had the opposite experience, tried Endevour first, must have done something wrong as it started running like ass/freezing up constantly requiring a full reboot to come back.

    Swapped to bazzite and didn't have that issue again, I did get to learn more about how to work with mutable distros too.

    Ultimately didn't matter much as that laptop died about a year later anyway, it won't turn on at all anymore, good run of like 10 years tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 9 months ago

    These odd freezes, especially when moving files at scale, is something I struggled with on all Arch-based distros I had installed: Arch itself, EndeavourOS, Manjaro.

    Either Arch doesn't like my hardware in some way, or it's just something Arch users struggle with.

    Any other distros worked just fine in that regard.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Same experience with bazzite.I had a very strange issue with packages completly gone after using LACT to experiment and managing to freeze my os.

    TBH I realised immutable systems aren't for me and I am not a linux noob, so I immediately went back to Arch and never looked back.

    archinstall is amazing btw. Best installer by far IMHO. shit free, takes 30s to setup an arch system with great defaults. Nothing beats it for me.

    Edit: for me someone using "I use void btw" would make more sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    What does immutable mean? I've been using Linux for decades and never heard it until recently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 6 points 9 months ago

    The root filesystem is read only, packages are installed on the user level through for example flakpak. And a lot of time system updates come as a whole new root filesystem, essentially making broken updates impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago

    I had cachyos for 6 months no issues than the last 6 months it's been freezing constantly, was fine on an older kernel, but fans and performance mode didnt work, stuck on high or low (could swap on latest rc kernel, but itd freeze) Tried bazzite and so far no freezes (except when using usb c to display port but I had bsod on windows doing that in vr and I think thats just a laptop hardware problem)

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Arch can be configured without archinstall in 20 minutes by a YouTube video even if you're a grandma with 0 technical skills.

    Let's all stop pretending that having it manually installed means anything and just use whatever does it for us. Like, well, Endeavour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Itโ€™s not the installation I fail on. Itโ€™s that 3-4 months after installation, my installation is so bespoke that I donโ€™t even know how to make a forum post on it anymore.

    I did mention I can install it by hand, but I hardly gain any benefit by doing so other than clout. And I donโ€™t give a hoot about clout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    That's one of my gripes with Arch, too. It takes too much manual interaction on an everyday basis, it's not a "set it and forget it" kind of system.

    To some, sometimes lesser, extent it also translates to its derivatives, be it Endeavour, Garuda, Manjaro or whatever strikes one's fancy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You... heavily overestimate a grandma with 0 technical skills.

    It can be installed in 20 minutes with a youtube video by a person with 0 technical knowledge that is comfortable using a computer and doesn't get scared seeing a terminal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 32 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Linux users when you use Windows: ๐Ÿ˜ก

    Linux users when you use Linux: ๐Ÿ˜ก

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Just use Arch like a normal well adjusted person

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 9 months ago

    Me when you use Windows: :|
    Me when you use Linux: :DD

    It's sad that there is a very vocal group of Linux users that will complain about every choice other Linux users make. But it's silly to be complaining about it, especially as that complaining keeps detracting people away from Linux. And I think there's lots of value in bringing people to Linux. In a time where Microsoft is turning a fairly useful OS into a platform whose only purpose is invasive telemetry and invasive marketing, Linux is a way to take back control of our computers. Linux gives you back more choice on what to do with your computer. And just because I don't personally agree with certain choices, that doesn't mean that everyone should be prohibited from making them, or that I get to scream with whoever makes those choices. Here's a final suggestion: be kind with one another, as there is already enough hatred in this world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 14 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    To each their own. I love plain 'ol vanilla Arch.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago

    Today's arch experience : upgraded after 6 months or so. Yeah, had to upgrade signatures first, had to remove manually conflicted stuff, and that's it. Works, as ever.

    Now yesterday I tried installing stremio on my wife's ubuntu. Gosh wtf, how do they expect any normal consumer going through gรฎt and stack' just to install that piece of crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    EndeavourOS is my favorite of most everything so far, and I started back during the Slackware days.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 11 points 10 months ago

    Yes, but CachyOS for me.

    So far only one update broke my entire system but luckily snapper was configured in the installation process so i just rolled back and updated 4 days later.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    ZFS - Snapshotting with cachyos is like a magic shield.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 8 points 10 months ago

    I like endeavorOS, it's the main distro I use on my pcs. I've run arch before (with i3wm and switchable Nvidia graphics) and did for years, but honestly I don't really have the time to properly configure my systems to my liking, so the option to install the sway community edition and just tweak a few settings in the config files is very nice.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 10 months ago

    I use Arch BTW

  • source
  • [โ€“] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I installed Artix yesterday.

    Absent-mindedly.

    Meant to install AntiX.

    Didn't realise until done.

    XD

    A silly grep for "tix" (not "tiX") in iso dir, saw the various inits, + dyslexia + haste, went with it thinking I had the right ones to dd to usb. So absent minded all the artix logos in my face didn't phase me through booting and installing. XD

    Doesn't really matter. Installed AntiX straight after. Hijacked with bedrocklinux and installing the other to another stratum too anyway. I just wanted antiX for hijack default init stratum from the start, for a more stable (slower-upgrading) base.

    Fun that two distros offering init freedom are so similarly named. Just one letter and one capitalisation different. r > n & x > X.

    Well. That was fun. LOL.

    Can you choose your init in Arch or EndeavourOS yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You mean "can you remove systemd"? Short answer: yes.

    Should you do it? Only if you're fucking insane.

    Just use Artix if you care that much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    You mean โ€œcan you remove systemdโ€? Short answer: yes.

    ? you can? I'd rather start without it, than try to remove it.

    Should you do it? Only if youโ€™re fucking insane.

    Why do you say that?

    Just use Artix if you care that much

    Or Devuan (or any devuan respin), or CRUX, or Gentoo, or VoidLinux, or Slackware, or GuixSD, or Loc-OS, or Alpine, or Joborun, or Hyperbola, or Parabola, or Venom, or PCLinuxOS, or GoboLinux, or SulinOS, or KISS Linux, or Carbs Linux, or LigurOS, or Dragora, or GlaucusLinux, or NutyX, or AntiX, or MXLinux, or Slitaz, or Puppy (or any pup respins), or PuffOS, or TinyCore, or Slax, or Chimera, or NXOS, or Peppermint, or LFS, or CalculateLinux, or RedCore Linux, or Obarun, or BedrockLinux, 4MLinux, or Absolute Linux, or Austrumi Linux, or BharOS, or CalyxOS, or Damn Small Linux, or DivestOS, or Dyne:bolic, or e, or Knoppix, or Kwort Linux, or LibreCMC, or LightOS, or LineageOS, or Nanolinux, or Porteus, or Salix, or Source Mage, or VectorLinux, or Vine Linux, or Zenwalk, or Zeroshell, or...

    ... Or any of the BSDs, or SerenityOS, or any of the AROS distros, or the one Ironclad distro (Gloire), or any of the OpenSolaris distros, or ReactOS, or Redox, or Kolibrios, or SculptOS, or Plan9/9Front, or Haiku, or...

    ... Did I miss any? [Edit... oh, I missed dozens]

    It's not like there's just one, nor even just an "insane" few, to avoid systemd. Contrary to the corporate encouraged misinfo smears going around.

    Even if one is insistent users stay in the arch cult, there are like half a dozen options.

    I prefer freedom of choice.

    Long live init-freedom.

    Defy group-think dogma.

    [PS, I do like the play on "Just use Mint". ;)]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    i love both, can anyone explain this meme to me?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 9 months ago

    I used eos as my main distro before switching to kubuntu and then to cachyos. One of best arch Linux forks. It is just like arch Linux + archinstall but is actually better than it.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next โ€บ