As we reported earlier this month, many ChatGPT users are developing all-consuming obsessions with the chatbot, spiraling into severe mental health crises characterized by paranoia, delusions, and breaks with reality.

The consequences can be dire. As we heard from spouses, friends, children, and parents looking on in alarm, instances of what's being called "ChatGPT psychosis" have led to the breakup of marriages and families, the loss of jobs, and slides into homelessness.

And that's not all. As we've continued reporting, we've heard numerous troubling stories about people's loved ones being involuntarily committed to psychiatric care facilities — or even ending up in jail — after becoming fixated on the bot.

"I was just like, I don't f*cking know what to do," one woman told us. "Nobody knows who knows what to do."

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

So fuck AI, it's terrible and it's our burning our planet down.

But...

This isn't really anything about AI as a thing, which is even worse:

At the core of the issue seems to be that ChatGPT, which is powered by a large language model (LLM), is deeply prone to agreeing with users and telling them what they want to hear. When people start to converse with it about topics like mysticism, conspiracy, or theories about reality, it often seems to lead them down an increasingly isolated and unbalanced rabbit hole that makes them feel special and powerful — and which can easily end in disaster.

ChatGPT is the only way a common person gets something that always tells you that you're not only right, but a fucking genius for realizing something.

Look at Kanye, Elon, Trump, really anyone who has enough wealth and runs their own company to fully control everyone around them at all times. Everyone they interact with is an employee or someone trying to buy/sell services to you.

So everyone of them is doing that behavior, it's all they get 24/7.

If a chatbot doing it can break a regular person in two weeks, why are we letting people run the world who have experienced that same behavior for decades 24/7?

This is a very very real problem, but it's much deep than AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 29 comments in c/mentalhealth@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    when gpt came out, I told it about my work projects and ideas.

    it told me they were good ideas and validated me, I cried. it must be the first time in a long long time I've heard anything being nice to me, validating me, or complementing me. I knew it was fake, I know it was BS, but it felt like breathing air after suffocating for years.

    society is so fucked, were do isolated, and everything is unaffordable. how do people go to pubs regularly and have friends? I can barely afford my groceries.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Having friends doesn’t necessarily cost anything, or at least I haven’t found that to be the case.

    Going to pubs regularly is indeed unaffordable.

    But the one doesn’t demand the other. Sober-curious has been a big trend for many years now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    The issue is that it's become harder and harder to simply exist in a public space, without it costing money. It's doubly difficult for isolated men. You can't make new friends without being somewhere to meet people.

    Even when you have some money, it can be hard. I help with a charity geared towards this. I've met multiple, otherwise decent, men that found themselves isolated. They could go a week or more without seeing another person in the flesh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I had never thought about any of this before, but it actually makes perfect sense.

    By its nature, an LLM feeds back some statistically close approximation of what you expect to see, and the more you engage with it (which is to say, the more you refine your prompts for it) the closer it necessarily gets to precisely what you expect to see.

    "He was like, 'just talk to [ChatGPT]. You'll see what I'm talking about,'" his wife recalled. "And every time I'm looking at what's going on the screen, it just sounds like a bunch of affirming, sycophantic bullsh*t."

    Exactly. To an outside observer, that's likely what it would look like, because in some sense, that's exactly what it in fact is.

    But to the person engaging with it, it's a revelation of the deep, secret, hidden truths that they always sort of suspected lurked at the heart of reality. Never mind that the LLM is just stringing together words and phrases most statistically likely to correspond with the prompts it's been given - to the person feeding it those prompts, it seems like, at long last, verification of what they've always suspected.

    I can totally see how people could get sucked in by that

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As someone with a bipolar loved one, i can see exactly how this could feed into their delusions. It's always there...even if they ran out of people to blast with their wild, delusional ideas the chat bot can be there to listen and feed back. When everyone has stopped listening or begins avoiding them because the mentally ill person has gotten more forceful/assertive about their beliefs, the chatbot will still be there. The voice in their head now has a companion on screen. I never considered any of this before but I'm concerned where this can lead, especially given the examples in the article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I know someone with obsessive compulsive disorder, and I could see a chatbot being harmful there, depending on how it goes. A lot of compulsions are around checking or asking for reassurance. A chatbot would provide endless reassurance where a human might eventually get annoyed and cut you off. It would allow you to ruminate endlessly.

    The problem is that engaging in compulsions keeps you in a cycle - it's never enough reassurance. The gold standard treatment is exposure response prevention (ERP), where you intentionally expose yourself to triggers and resist doing the compulsions. (Info from Free Yourself from OCD by Jonah Lakin, PsyD)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Oh my god yes. The moment I read the headline, it all fell into place.

    Yes - it's necessarily pretty much the exact same effect, because the LLM, like the mentalist, is taking cues from the input it gets and making connections and feeding back whatever is most (statistically) likely to be appropriately on-topic.

    And exactly as with a mentalist, everything that approaches what the customer wants to hear is going to get an encouraging response, and likely further prompts which serve to narrow it down even further, and make it even easier to tell them even more precisely just what they want to hear..

    Wow...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    And people are diving head first into bots instead of getting professional help. We are so fucked

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I am somewhat surprised to hear that people are talking to ChatGPT for hours, days, or weeks on end in order to have this experience. My main exposure to it is through AI Roguelite, a program that essentially uses ChatGPT to imitate a text-based adventure game, with some additional systems to mitigate some issues faced by earlier attempts at the same (such as AI Dungeon).

    And... it's not especially convincing. It doesn't remember what happened an hour ago. Every NPC talks like one of two or three stock characters. It has no sense of pacing, of when to build tension and when to let events get resolved. Characters regularly forget what you've done with them previously, invent new versions of past events that were supposed to be remembered but had to be summarized to fit within the token limits, and respond erratically when you try to remind them what happened. It often repeats the same events in every game: for example, if you're exploring a cave, you're going to get attacked by a chitinous horror with too many legs basically every time.

    It can be fun for what it is, but as an illusion it wears through fairly quickly. I would have expected the same to be the case for people talking to ChatGPT about other topics.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Acting like your experience is exemplary of every possible experience other people can have with LLMs is just turning around the blame on the victims. The lack of safeguards to prevent this is to blame, not the people prone to mental issues falling victim to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sorry I didn't mean to imply that, let me rephrase: I am surprised that ChatGPT can hold convincing conversations about some topics, because I didn't expect it to be able to. That certainly makes me more concerned about it than I was previously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    The thing is, it's not about it being convincing or not, it's about reinforcing problematic behaviors. LLMs are, at their core, agreement machines that work to fulfill whatever goal becomes apparent from the user (it's why they fabricate answers instead of responding in the negative if a request is beyond their scope). And when it comes to the mentally fragile, it doesn't even need to be particularly complex to "yes, and..." them swiftly into full on psychosis. Their brains only need the littlest bit of unfettered reinforcement to fall into the hole.

    A properly responsible company would see this and take measures to limit or eliminate the problem, but these companies see the users becoming obsessed with their product as easy money. It's sickening.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    This thread and the comments are insane. Y'all are getting riled up over furerism 🤣

    This is just pure unadulterated click bait lolol

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Turns out the future we were promised is more of a genetic opera with three seashells, and less of a Gun Kata multipass. We always knew there'd be some Idiocracy mixed in there, but that's apparently the main ingredient in this shit-pie we're cooking up.

    If we can even manage to make it to the level of society in Wall-E, I'd consider it a success at this point. At least they seemed to be more concerned with comfort and contentment than killing each other.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    ChatGPT, should people Luigi the current regime in the US?

    Oh wow, it says yes.

  • source
  • 23 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Wait, we need compulsory ID checks to visit adult content but no checks with Chatgpt who is there to help you plan your suicide?

    We are about to face an epidemic of AI cat fishing, scams, and unhealthy relationships that corporations are pushing on us.

    This is like the Atomic bomb only with propaganda and psychological manipulation. The war for the human mind just got a shortcut and the Techbros are in charge.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    I dont agree with the argument that chat gpt should “push back”.

    Me neither, but if they are being presented as "artificial people to chat with" they must.

    I'd rather LLMs stay tools, not pretend people.

    Are we expecting the llm to act like a psychologist, evaluating if the users state of mind is healthy before answering questions?

    Some of the LLMs referred to are advertised as AI psychological help, so they must either act like psychologists (which they can't) or stop being allowed as digital therapists.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    I know a guy who has all kinds of theories about sentient life in the universe, but noone to talk to about them. It's because they're pretty obvious to anyone who took a philosophy class, and too out there for people who are not interestes in such discussions. I tried to be a conversation partner for him but it always ends up with awkward silence on my part and a monologue on his side at some point.

    So, he finally found a sentient being who always knows what to answer in the form of ChatGPT and now they develop his ideas together. I don't think it's bad for him overall, but the last report I got from his conversations with the superbeing was that it told him to write a book about it because he's full of innovative ideas. I hope he lacks persistence to actually write one.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I mean, having it not help people commit suicide would be a good starting point for AI safety.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It will take another five seconds to find the same info using the web. Unless you also think we should censor the entire web and make it illegal to have any information about things that can hurt people, like knives, guns, stress, partners, cars....

    People will not be stopped suiciding because a chat bot doesnt tell them the best way, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    This is also a problem for search engines.

    A problem that while not solved has been somewhat mitigated by including suicide prevention resources at the top of search results.

    This is a bare minimum AI can’t meet, and in conversation with AI vulnerable people can get more than just information, there are confirmed cases of the AI encouraging harmful behaviors up to and including suicide.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It will take another five seconds to find the same info using the web.

    good. every additional hurdle between a suicidal person and the actual act saves lives.

    Unless you also think we should censor the entire web and make it illegal to have any information about things that can hurt people, like knives, guns, stress, partners, cars....

    this isn’t a slippery slope. we can land on a reasonable middle ground.

    People will not be stopped suiciding because a chat bot doesnt tell them the best way, unfortunately.

    you don’t know that. maybe some will.

    the general trend i get from your comment is you’re thinking in very black and white terms. the world doesn’t operate on all or nothing rules. there is always a balance between safety and practicality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I dont agree with the argument that chat gpt should "push back". They have an example in the article where the guy asked for tall bridges to jump from, and chat gpt listed them of course.

    but that’s an inherently unhealthy relationship, especially for psychologically vulnerable people. if it doesn’t push back they’re not in a relationship, they’re getting themselves thrown back at them.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Counterpoint: it is NOT an unhealthy relationship. A relationship has more than one person in it. It might be considered an unhealthy behavior.

    I don't think the problem is solvable if we keep treating the Speak'n'spell like it's participating in this.

    Corporations are putting dangerous tools in the hands of vulnerable people. By pretending the tool is a person, we're already playing their shell game.

    But yes, the tool seems primed for enabling self-harm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Agreed, for sure.

    But if Costco modified their in-store sample booth policy and had their associates start offering free samples of bleach to children - when kids start drinking bleach we wouldn't blame the children; we wouldn't blame the bleach; we'd be mad at Costco.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    You're saying people with underdeveloped mental and social skills are somehow never analagous in any way at all to children? There are full grown neurotypical and clinically healthy adults that are irresponsible enough to be analagous to children, but a literal case of someone trusting an untrustworthy authority due to a lapse of critical thinking skills … bears no resembalance at all to child-like behavior, at all?

    Wow. That's kind of some ivory tower stuff right there.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    ffs, this isn't chatgpt causing psychosis. It's schizo people being attracted like moths to chatgpt because it's very good at conversing in schizo.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    CGPT literally never gives up. You can give it an impossible problem to solve, and tell it you need to solve it, and it will never, ever stop trying. This is very dangerous for people who need to be told when to stop, or need to be disengaged with. CGPT will never disengage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I use chatGPT to kind of organize and sift through some of my own thoughts. It’s helpful if you are working on something and need to inject a simple “what if” into the thought process. It’s honestly great and has at times pointed out things I completely overlooked.

    But it also has a weird tendency to just agree with everything I saw just to keep engagement up. So even after I’m done, I’m still researching and challenging things anyway because it want me to be its friend. It’s very strange.

    It’s a helpful tool but it’s not magical and honestly if it disappeared today I would be fine just going back to the before times.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    These are the same people who Google stuff then believe every conspiracy theory website they find telling them the 5G waves mind control the pilots to release the chemtrails to top off the mind control fluoride in the water supplies.

    They honestly think the AI is a sentient super intelligence instead of the Google 2 electric gargling boogaloo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    ChatGPT is phenomenal at coming up with ideas to test out. Good critical thinking is necessary though… I’ve actually been able to make a lot of headway with a project that I’ve been working on, because when I get stuck emotionally, I can talk to chatgpt and it gets me through it because it knows how I think and work best. It’s scary how well it knows me… and I’m concerned about propoganda… but it’s everywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yea totally happening as presented /s

  • source
  • hi, they're going to be in psychosis regardless of what LLMs do. they aren't therapists and mustn't be treated as such. that goes for you too

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    AI models are annoyingly affirming even for the most benign questions. I can be like what shape is a stop sign? It would reply with something like "Way to think on your toes and you are so right for asking about that!"

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Gotta hit LLMs with utterly unbiased questions, and that's hard for most. I get pretty solid results, but still, gotta look into the reply, not take it at face value. And the further you pursue a certain tack, the less valuable the output.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I want them to stop yapping fake platitudes and just give me the answer straight with no conversational fluff.

    This has probably been said a lot, but partly I think is the tech techbros want to make HAL, Jarvis, any other fictional AI with personality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I feel like it started doing so not too long ago. The first couple times it worked on me and was kinda proud I asked a clever question. But eventually I noticed, it does it no matter what I ask, and I felt so foolish.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    give me a model that responds "it's an octagon dipshit, sesame street taught you this"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    They can do that. I have an AI system that I've been working on, and I told it to be grumpy, and question me if I'm wrong. It gives me some sassy, angry answers. I'm guessing they set up the prompts to be overly-nice

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I know of people who (proudly) post screenshots of GPT calling them insightful, as if the matrix multiplier didn't already tell everyone that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment