It's all wishful thinking, so go crazy.

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 62 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Constantine. 

    I know it may not have checked all the boxes for comic fans but it was a great movie with great characters and atmosphere. 

    I’ve thought about this several times since its release. Apparently I’m not the only one. Keanu was asked a similar question last year but about his own catalogue and he said the same thing, he wishes there had been a sequel.

    A few months after that, I think I read a sequel might be coming.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I never saw the movie, but the 2014 TV show was awesome and I wish it had gotten another season. Having the same actor make a few lame crossovers with the Arrowverse did not suffice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    Do yourself a favour and give the movie a whirl. I'm in the minority but as a long time fan of Hellblazer (original run of 300! comics) I was happy with the movie, thought it was adequately close to the material (for a movie, how can you fit the scope of the source material into 1.5 hours...) and a good old romp overall.

    The TV show was excellent, quite close in look and feel and Matt Ryan nailed it (also his characterization in Legends but the writing there was lesser for the character, even though I enjoy Legends for their goofy, campy fun, Constantine wasn't a good fit), totally want some more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The worst part about Constantine was the main cast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Keanu playing an emotionally arrested dude was pretty spot on.

    And although not a main character, but Peter Stomaire's Lucifer was pretty haunting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 83 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    The correct answer is District 9.

    However, I find I'm often disappointed by sequels to great movies. I feel like there are far more mediocre movies that failed to fully explore the depths of a good concept, where a sequel (perhaps in a different genre) would retroactivel make the first movie better.

    For that, I also choose Johnny Mnemonic.

    Also, In Time, Elysium, or Chappie.

    I also think now would be a great time for a Galaxy Quest sequel. There's a lot of fertile sci-fi tropes that could make for another hilarious movie. Like, after the end of the revival of the original show, there's a Next Generation spin-off that overshadows the original, plus a bunch of expanded universe content. The Thermians and other aliens keep replicating the nonsense as real technology. What remains of the OG crew has to convince the new cast and writers/showrunners to stop being so lazy in their hand-wavy rushed bullshit, because there are very real consequences to poorly executed cash grabs full of plot holes and dangling threads. Maybe there's a prequel series that creates a schism in the Thermian society, with the older generation following the Never Give Up, Never Surrender idealism, and the younger generation believing in a grittier, cynical imperialistic ideology.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Johnny Mnemonic is based of a short story of the same name by William Gibson. It's set in the same world as Neuromancer and his other cyberpunk. If you want to see it explored more, I recommend reading those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Huh, I read Neuromancer a long time ago, but I forget almost everything about it. Would that make a good film?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    It was one of the main inspirations for the Matrix so it sort of has been made.

    But yeah I could see a Neuromancer movie being good too! I can't remember exactly how similar Neuro was to the Matrix because it has been so long but it did have the concept of "plugging in" to the network at least

    edit Neuromancer TV series is coming soon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromancer_(TV_series)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It would take one hell of a director but maybe. The descriptions of a lot of things in the book are abstract and weird. Things and ideas are sometimes described as if you are already familiar with them and the world. It would take someone with vision. I'm also worried that if it were done well, it may not have a wide enough appeal to please the execs at the box office.

    Apple is making it into a TV show right now, and I'm expecting to be disappointed. Most media has been too Netflixified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I hadn't hear about that, but I think of all the streaming content producers, Apple has the best track record for producing quality content. But yeah, the fact that I barely remember reading Neuromancer, and what I do remember was confusion, I bet that's a tough needle to thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 64 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    The Fifth Element. So much untapped potential in that dystopia. It could be a direct sequel following up on Korben and Leeloo, or a spin-off following Ruby Rod, or a prequel around the previous time the Evil threatened the world, or a thousand other possibilities.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    There was originally plans for a sequel but I think there where some issues with casting it under performing in the box office. Also, it would need to be with someone else leading as Bruce Willis is too sick to act any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I can't believe they didn't make a second Superbad. The plot line wrote itself. Seth goes to visit Evan and Fogel one weekend at Dartmouth. The cops have been fired and are now working as lowly campus security officers. Hi-jinks ensue. Call it Superbadder. Boom done.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    A. The Princess Bride. More likely a spinoff with Inigo becoming the dead pirate Roberts

    B. Pacific rim. Because we all agree that there is no sequel

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Dredd. The movie was only so-so but it was a really good setup for a sequel. Karl Urban also knocked it out of the park. The Stallone version was good for what it was but it didn't really feel like Judge Dredd.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    You are the first person I've ever seen refer to Dredd as anything less than an action masterpiece.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    When they remade Total Recall, I thought the OG was better because I am an action fan and the Swrtzenegger one is jam packed with action.

    I went into Dredd kinda expecting a similar thing, but nah. It's way better than the Stallone one as a action movie. The Stallone one I now consider a comedy, instead. "Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and OK for you."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    For Total Recall, the point was that the state of the film was ambiguious. Were the events on screen the memories bought and paid for, or was it a real spy thriller.

    The remake answeres that question and ruins the entire premice of the film. This is a key example on why these Hollywoo "remakes" are widely panned, they usually miss the point of the origional art and audiences are dumber for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Dredd (2012) was a techically proficient, but ultimately mediocre piece of uncritical copraganda action schlock, and a vastly inferior film to Judge Dredd (1995). i will die on this hill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    I mean the nostalgia runs deep for the 1995 one cause I was a child, but I highly recommend posting this on unpopular opinion.

    I'll give you this, the old one felt more comic bookish. But if they do go back to the campy, please give me some dark judges!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Léon: The Professional

    Did she grow up to be a nice girl or a cleaner?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    I know it was based on the movie that predated Léon, but I always took La Femme Nikita (the TV show) as a sequel of sorts to Léon. I mean, both movies were Luc Besson, and both covered similar ground, so it's easy enough to conceive of Mathilda taking a new name and identity and carrying on Léon's line of work.

    That said, I've not seen La Femme Nikita since it originally broadcast, so I could be remembering it wildly wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    dont recall natalie portman ever being in an action flick

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Does Thor count as an action flick? Or Star Wars?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    i completely forgot about thor...don't recall her doing much proper action though (the movie was fucking terrible, i try to forget it in general).

    guess i should have said "any action flicks since star wars"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Trick question. A good standalone movie doesn't need or want a sequel.

    I feel like too often people end up making sequels to good and popular things that never needed to be expanded upon, and they end up really bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    A second problem is that if a much beloved movie (or video game) comes out, there's a window of time where you can make a sequel with the same team, actors that are about at the same age, and so forth.

    But if you let 20 years go by, that team is gone. Some may be retired, some are doing other things and won't come back, actors will have aged, etc. You're going to have a hard time assembling a group with the same chemistry again.

    I think that in many cases, it's better to do a similar work. Like, okay, say you like a space opera like Battlestar Galactica or Firefly or something. I liked both. But...trying to do more of same is going to be a tall order. A lot of times a new team tries to get continuity by lots of in-jokes or allusions to the original that the original team probably wouldn't have, and I think that that can be a negative. If it's a live movie, it's probably going to be hard to get ahold of props from the original and such any more. Like, I'd rather just have someone go do a new, good space opera in the same vein that tries to emulate the good bits of what I liked about the original. A spiritual successor rather than an actual one.

    I'm not saying that it has never been the case that there have been good sequels done by other people. I like the Fallout video game series, and it's had a variety of teams and companies that have done entries. But I think that there have been a large proportion of attempts to build on past IP using a new team that just don't work out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Titanic. Rose Dawson struggling to make it as an actress while staying under the radar of Cal and her mother.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I haven't seen the fourth, but I don't think that the second and third movies were that bad. It wasn't Phantom Menace for Star Wars, where the movie just targeted a completely different demographic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I also didn't think the 2nd & 3rd were that bad. There's no such thing as the 4th movie though unless you count the parody movie pretending to be a sequel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Smith: Things have changed. The market's tough. I'm sure you can understand why our beloved parent company, Warner Brothers, has decided to make a sequel to the trilogy.

    Neo: What?

    Smith: They informed me they're gonna to do it with or without us.

    Neo: I thought they couldn't do that?

    Smith: Oh, they can, and they made it clear they would kill our contract if we didn't cooperate.

    Everything you need to know about the movie. I strongly suspect that Lana Wachowski deliberately made the movie as dogshit as she could plausibly get away with so as to properly kill the franchise once and for all, or at least until she's dead and someone else can try to pick up the pieces and reboot the whole thing in a few decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You're not going to fool us into doing your only job MGM/HBO/Disney/Paramount/...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I always wondered what a Grandma's Boy sequel could look like.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›