top 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 122 points 10 months ago (6 children)

What about, y'know, doing the actual research you're supposed to be writing about?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Could be a mathmatician writing about numbers and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    We still do research and have lots of work to do before a paper even begins lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 64 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I wish I knew this when I was starting out:

    • write grant proposals instead of articles
    • use the winning grants to support grad students
    • get the grad students to do the research and writing which motivate new grant proposals
    • keep writing grant proposals until the entire world is either your grad students, or people funding your research
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    At my peak, I easily posted a million words a year to Reddit. The idea that I wasn't putting that effort into actual productive writing is definitely an idea I've had many, many times.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago

    Love it when people publish just to publish, really improves the whole academic enterprise!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago

    This seems like it should be in the LinkedInLunatics community.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    Lol someone is equating writing the next twilight saga to research, which requires (checks notes) ... research

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    4000 words? That's only like 40 minutes a day at 100 wpm, a speed anyone writing professionally should easily be able to maintain. Spend half the workday writing. 24000 words a day. 6 times the articles. Thank me later.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    This is like the myth of the 10x AI developer. Even if I could code 10x faster, coding is only maybe 25% of what I do at best.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Bonus points if you take all those words you wrote, sort them alphabetically, and publish them as ~3k word works. Challenge the STEM community to reconstruct your original papers.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    I know of a manager who unironically believes this for internal corporate technical reports (ours are academic style and more rigorous and formal than they need be...). It's not quite to this extent, but I've overheard conversations where the manager apparently can't fathom why their subordinates are incapable of double digits over a year.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I remeber something about monkeys and typewriters 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Was even Paul Erdös that productive?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Easy there Mr. Hubbard!

  • source