top 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 104 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Just release the torrent jeez

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Torrents are for illegal stuff.

    ...oh, wait

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    My 800TB of uploads for “Linux isos” beg to differ

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I'm looking through those and holy shit these images look like they're taken straight out of a horror game

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Looks like investigative photos cast a very creepy "using a high powered flashlight to investigate a crime scene" vibe. Horror games with flashlights kinda got the vibe right, it seems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, I think it's all in the lighting. For a crime scene, you probably just want to get really bright light on everything the camera sees. That ends up making the shadows seem very harsh, and every other light source weak. There's probably some primal fear that if your eyes are adjusted to the light, you're vulnerable to creatures who are hiding in the shadows with their eyes adjusted to the dark.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    What? Those are some pretty benign photos. Even the painting is hard to judge without knowing anything about who the other person is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    I don't think she is referring to what the pictures are of, but rather that the ambiance of the pictures invoke horror. Like the harsh lighting and camera angles make it seem like it could be from a horror game or movie. While they are just pictures of a house, they still feel strange.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Some of the redactions elsewhere seem insensible, but I feel like Masseuses might be victims too, and that just seems like a list of names?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    One of them is basically guaranteed to be Virginia Giuffre. The fact that she does not even appear is an implicit broadcast that the DoJ is not being impartial on this, and is overtly biasing their handling at a very, very official level.

    For those that had any semblance of doubt at this point, I mean, obviously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    If I download this am I on a list

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 30 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    There are worse ways to get an FBI buddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I got one by losing internal organs and in the process somehow pissing off a priest who was connected to a senator and decided to take a little petty vengeance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    right? you'd have thought i'd have learned my lesson the first time, but then i pissed off the son of a senator connected to a priest and got a second fbi guy. we should really go to lunch sometime and compare notes on each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If you had a nickel for everytime… you’d have ten cents which isn’t a lot but it’s weird it happened twice

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Yeah. I like to think I'm special that I've got two fbi guys, but let's be honest I'm probably just aware of two, we've all got at least a team (of LLMs, hereafter LLaMas because those dipshits can't name anything for beancornen

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    In the flight logs of 1993 Donald Trump is mentioned twice.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I'm curious; are you guys seeing this currently?

    I've viewed this link half a dozen times in the last two hours and never once saw the rate limiting page, from Canada. I wonder if it's regional.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    ⁶🤷🏻‍♂️⁷

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly, I'll commend them on good website design. Back when Obamacare first launched, government web sites were especially bad at handling high load. A website that knows it is under high load and knows how to queue requests to keep working is actually admirable, especially for the government. I guess DOGE didn't fully fuck over DOJ.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Wait pages like this are nonsense. If the server has capacity to show you this it could just show you the content you are looking for. Its obvious artificial rate limiting.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    not really; that page is much simpler to process and upload than an entire pedophile archive

    sharing anything over the internet takes resources, in this case a lot of them, and with government infrastructure they're sometimes far behind the modern day trends on purpose, for stability/reliability reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago

    Also caching is a factor here. Search results in particular can be a nightmare since variations in spelling or query string parameters having a difference of a single character makes it different than what others previously searched.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago*

    Not nessissarially true, very likely the wait page is rendered from cached memory and does not require a ssd read to print whereas any actual files would. It is true that the web server does have to have capacity to show you this, but I'm pretty sure the limitation will be on the SSD side. (Read and write operations). Source 5 years webserver admin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Interestingly, if someone links you to one of the files directly, there is no wait or redirect to the wait page.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Which means they have no actual issue with content delivery, else they would limit that too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments