all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 1 year ago

Love this idea

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    This idea will be shot down in America because somehow someway all ai companies will have first dibs on digital versions of your face

    I can feel it

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Excellent move and a good step towards using signing keys to authenticate genuine content, something I think will become inevitable across the board.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You probably claim copyright infringement if a shady cam face recognition service takes your image. And they'd have to remove it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The article is unclear but that's my reading of it too. It's obviously infeasible to sue everybody who does this (especially if you're a public figure, it would be hundreds of lawsuits) so I think the endgame is that if the content doesn't have a signature, we assume it's fake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It would be almost impossible to know who even had a copy, but maybe it also gives a legal avenue to stop agencies selling your face data, since they'd be profiting off of copyrighted "works"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How is this supposed to work? What about identical twins? What about people who look alike (more common than you’d think)?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Can't trust the Fae

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I read feces, and got confused for a sec, lol

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I still have a hunch one day certain types of people will wear a pendant that generates a new one-time-password every second along with a 360 body cam that captures their movements and the screen of the pendant.

    Veo 3 isn’t too bad but we don’t know what it’s like to live in a world where Veo 15 is open source, local, free, and “abliterated” (uncensored). The first time someone claims it wasn’t them punching the victim in the face but the victim lured them to a trackable location and then released a fake video, demand and supply will follow.

    That wasn’t me. Talk to my lawyers; they’ll connect you with my chosen Big 4 accounting firm who has the actual OTPs from that timestamp.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And the AI Company Man told me I needed to scan my face into an orb to do this! At least they used the word "governance" a bit and offered me a pittance for the brave new opportunity.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Having copyright means nothing if the people can't enforce it. How mch does it cost for a normal citizen to take one (1) corporation to a jury trial, again?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We don't go by American rules here. We can take a corporation to court. Not only that, but Unions are a big thing here for that specific reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fair point. Still, I have to question how many normal citizens can afford to do that. I've literally never heard a news heading like "Portugal citizen takes IBM to trial, execs in jail for 25 years".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Guess we just don't have very many cases like that. Companies aren't really known to exploit their workers here the same way you see in some other countries. Hell, they all encourage that you're part of a union. Some won't even hire you if you're not.

    Usually when execs get busted for something, it's tax-fraud and such. And the few that abuse workers get fired pretty damned fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ah janteloven, danish humility.

    I live in Denmark, used to live in the US. Lots of problems still, but it's basically just across the board better in most ways to me.

    I think the copyright law is a great step. Yeah, there's probably some holes in the law and it doesn't fix everything but I don't know what else could be done, nor what other countries are doing nearly this much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    About to live in Denmark for about six months, I'm certain I will have to be dragged back into the states kicking and screaming the whole while. I'm fully expecting some pretty large changes in my mental health and quality of life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Good article except that they called this:

    The clip, which was presented as a dream sequence and clearly labelled as AI-manipulated content, prompted debate about the acceptable boundaries of the technology.

    A grey area. Come on, that's very clearly satire.

  • source