▲ 217 ▼ Danish citizens to ‘own their own faces’ to prevent deepfakes (www.thetimes.com) submitted 1 year ago by can@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ca 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] can@sh.itjust.works [S] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) How would it work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (4 children) You probably claim copyright infringement if a shady cam face recognition service takes your image. And they'd have to remove it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) This reads like a legit version of SovCit theory permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Heh, yeah. But probably just a legal way to be able to stop agencies selling your data, since then they are profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent [–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) The article is unclear but that's my reading of it too. It's obviously infeasible to sue everybody who does this (especially if you're a public figure, it would be hundreds of lawsuits) so I think the endgame is that if the content doesn't have a signature, we assume it's fake. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago It would be almost impossible to know who even had a copy, but maybe it also gives a legal avenue to stop agencies selling your face data, since they'd be profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (4 children) You probably claim copyright infringement if a shady cam face recognition service takes your image. And they'd have to remove it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) This reads like a legit version of SovCit theory permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Heh, yeah. But probably just a legal way to be able to stop agencies selling your data, since then they are profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent [–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) The article is unclear but that's my reading of it too. It's obviously infeasible to sue everybody who does this (especially if you're a public figure, it would be hundreds of lawsuits) so I think the endgame is that if the content doesn't have a signature, we assume it's fake. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago It would be almost impossible to know who even had a copy, but maybe it also gives a legal avenue to stop agencies selling your face data, since they'd be profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) This reads like a legit version of SovCit theory permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Heh, yeah. But probably just a legal way to be able to stop agencies selling your data, since then they are profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Heh, yeah. But probably just a legal way to be able to stop agencies selling your data, since then they are profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) The article is unclear but that's my reading of it too. It's obviously infeasible to sue everybody who does this (especially if you're a public figure, it would be hundreds of lawsuits) so I think the endgame is that if the content doesn't have a signature, we assume it's fake. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago It would be almost impossible to know who even had a copy, but maybe it also gives a legal avenue to stop agencies selling your face data, since they'd be profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago It would be almost impossible to know who even had a copy, but maybe it also gives a legal avenue to stop agencies selling your face data, since they'd be profiting off of copyrighted "works" permalink fedilink source parent