top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    POOF

    Wish 1: Delete your self (the genie deletes your sense of self)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Me trying to uninstall edge

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Edge is the best browser for downloading much better browsers lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Edge is literally the first program I use on a fresh install.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I don't know what's the hate with edge, it works wonderfully for an average user, it's fully configurable with add-ons and handles security policies really well

    The AI integration might be a bit over the top but nothing you can't disable in your side

    Really I don't see why you guys pile on so much on it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Microsoft's monopoly and their for-profit anti-consumer practices is what's wrong with it. Their history says they cannot be trusted. I'd ask myself why they need a browser in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Because it’s my fucking computer and I shouldn’t have to edit the registry to uninstall a program I don’t use.

    After every update it’s also reset to my default browser which is infuriating

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    A lot of the hate comes from Microsoft forcing it down everyones throats.

    If it had been left to user choice, they may actually have a decent userbase; but instead it's been forcefully installed on pretty much every windows computer regardless of the owners preferences, it repeatedly re-asserts itself as the default browser, some windows features are hard-coded to use it and break if its removed, there is no simple uninstall process, and windows update will re-install it if you manually remove it.

    It's my damn computer; if I don't want a piece of software, I should be able to remove it.

    Ditched Windows entirely 2 years ago partly because of that, partly because of the same upcoming behaviour with AI. Fuck Microshaft, I'll take my money and attention elsewhere. (I was previously paying for/using pro licenses, for features like RDP hosting)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    My work laptop had a pop-up from an application that basically said "we couldn't restart last time, so you e got 15 minutes until we reboot your computer" with no way to cancel or prevent the reboot.

    Me: the fuck you are

    * proceeds to kill the service and process from admin command line*

    Get fucked fortinet, I'll reboot when I'm gods damned ready

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago
    [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    One time Windows told me I needed admin privileges to edit s file. I had admin privileges.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You needed permission from the SYSTEM or TrustedInstaller account.

    Which you can give to yourself if you are admin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Last time I did that it didn't work so I figured I will restart and it will recognize then. Windows got a 30 minute update.

    When I logged back in my account was gone and still asked for a password. My old password didn't work.

    Recovery option also fucked my grub. (Probably just the EFI now that I think about it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    had a friend that was having problems with his PC and windows kept bitching about he didn't have permissions. he ripped out the harddrive with it still powered on and threw it off his balcony into the lake screaming, "I fucking own you!"

    epic moment in my life to witness such an event.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 76 points 1 year ago (20 children)
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago* (15 children)

    Not necessarily. Linux can have files that are r---r---r--- too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    sudo chown -R 1000:1000 /* && sudo chmod -R 777 /*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    alias iownyou='sudo chown -R 1000:1000 /* && sudo chmod -R 777 /*'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Now I've learned enough to know that I can easily learn what all that apparent gibberish does with the "man" command, but you have no idea how unbelievably unapproachable this makes Linux look to the uninitiated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Create one command "iownyou" that does tbe following: Change the owner of every file on the computer to the default user and make every file readable, writeable, an executable by anyone or anything on the computer. It may not be secure, but on the bright side, you'll never have permission issues again!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Then you sudo chmod. Windows I have to do weird shit with the properties context menu. And even that sometimes doesn't work. I run commands in powershell as Administrator. Still doesn't work.

    Fuck Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    That’s just because Linux is designed for end users so everything is intuitive and easy. Windows is designed for tech nerds that like digging through pages to make anything work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Me, realizing I can't delete Edge because the OS assumes it's installed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago*

    EZ fix i learnt from hunter2

    chmod 777 -R /

    sudo ufw allow 22

    hunter2 ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Can't shutdown there is a running program

    /Me finger immediately goes to the power switch

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I still remember the biggest brainfart moment as a child. I was playing video games on my computer, and kinda just looked around. On the pc was a turbo button, so i pressed it, turbo makes games faster. I looked again and one button said power. I wonder what that doe... I'm dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    If you're on windows this means you don't own the file. Go to properties security and take ownership.

    The default windows configuration is aimed at old people who will call tech support when they fuck up their PC.

    You can take ownership of pretty much the entire filesystem.

    Windows is actually hugely customizable people just don't.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    In the basic case you go to settings and change permissions.

    In the more typical case for os modifications, you go to that tab, open advanced properties, change the owner account by typing in "everyone" or your account name by hand, saving, closing reopening the advanced security settings, probably disable inheritance then create a new permission entry.

    In the most extreme case, where you change files belonging to something critical like windows defender or edge, you can't.
    The only way I am aware of is booting into an older windows install iso, or a live linux iso, then performing the modifications there.

    Disclaimer: I have not done this on windows 11 yet, but I can't imagine the process got simplified.

    Windows has a lot of systems that allow some more complicated modifications. Those are often unnecessarily obfuscated, the registry for example doesn't have to be a weird custom database, it could have been part of the filesystem or at least a more standard database format. Windows will sometimes bite you with weird sketchy systems breaking expectations, and this tends to become inevitable when you try to change stuff Microsoft has decided to remove consumer choice on.
    If Edge and the account push were as easy to avoid as learning how to take basic file ownership, we might not be where we are now (i.e. on Linux).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Glad to see another voice of sanity regarding Windows.

    If you haven't learned by now, on Lemmy the only valid option for dealing with Windows configuration and basic Windows admin tasks is to yeet Windows and go to Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That isn't the reason to yeet Windows. If you were talking years ago about 7 or XP, things were different. 10 is not that great comparably, and 11 is a mess. But keep your Windows, if it's what works for you. Until it doesn't.

    Dual boot for the best of both worlds (although I'm finding myself more and more on the Linux side because it's better for me.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Even Windows 11 still has all the options Windows 7 had, and plenty more. Stop swallowing the Linux propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's the constant war on end users that chased me away from windows.

    You can't say no to their relentless advertising. It's "maybe later". The pushing to require a Microsoft account. Ads in the start menu. Windows Recall.

    The list goes on. You get as much agency as Microsoft allows, or you violate your eula and modify the os to remove things you don't want.

    We didn't know it at the time, but windows 7 was peak windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    100% valid choice. I'd argue that it's even the correct one.

    That said, those specific examples are all "solved". My issue is that the overwhelming amount of Linux pushers here tend to act as though those issues are literally unsolvable.

    The ads are nearly all controlled from a single yes/no switch a single level deep into the settings menu. And that switch has not been reset by updates in at least four years. Since I've joined lemmy, every single "Microsoft is pushing more ads into Windows" article I've seen has been talking about ads controlled by this same singular switch.

    Things like the pushing of the Microsoft account and Recall are mostly avoided by using their Professional SKU/License/OS version and using GPO to disable those features. Or to take specific steps during install. You have to use the tools they have for corporate customers that have specific legal guidelines that prevent them from being able to use whatever MS's new revenue extraction trick is.

    Bullshit? Yes. Should anyone have to do this shit to have a decent OS? No.

    But if you're savvy enough to navigate Linux, you're more than capable of navigating this shit on Windows. It's not impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I just riced my work computer, let me fucken tell ya about tricking out a windows machine: its fucking embarrassing. Not that its fundamentally different than customizing Linux, for both you download apps (or packages). But its a clumsy ass mess on windows that has to overlay the existing shit, on Linux the only shit that exists is what I want. I dont have to deal with an onery built in taskbar, or trick a built in window manager to be tiling. The one I pick does what I want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    If you haven't learned by now, on Lemmy the only valid option for dealing with Windows configuration and basic Windows admin tasks is to yeet Windows and go to Linux.

    Not true. The only valid option to deal with Windows at all is to yeet it and go to Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sometimes one wants to access a file without making changes though. Escalating privileges is the answer in this scenario and windows doesn't make that as easy,as it doesn't really want to you act as SYSTEM

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    100% true, and a great counterpoint.

    Copium/denialThat's well beyond even power user (imo) and into the forensic analysis realm though, where you should probably be using dedicated tools. I'm pretty sure there are still ways around this, ways to back up and restore the ACLs, but I haven't ran into a need to not touch the modified timestamp in the decade or so I've been doing tech work professionally nor in the decade before as simply a young enthusiast. There's still ways around that timestamp too, and arguments to be made that adjusting the ACL is touching metadata rather than the file itself.

    I do what I can to stay out of ACLs at my workplace.

    Windows ACLs are far more complicated than they have any right to be, and file perms are generally far simpler on Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sounds like a bad excuse for having a shitty product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I work in this space profressionally. Systems administrarion, architecture, design, and integration. Please take your single sentence "hot takes" elsewhere.

    Windows is far from "a shitty product" or "broken". It is developed by horrid anti-consumer motherfuckers out to extract as much profit as possible from their least profitable user base: home users. Evil as hell, sure, but so is nearly every large corporation that makes shit that fills your personal hovel you call home. If that makes them untouchable for you, that is a great choice. But that does not factually impact the usability or usefulness of the product.

    Linux is awesome and necessary. Open source is the only way this whole mess keeps working far into the future, and I am no stranger to compiling shit from source and submitting pull requests.

    My problems with the Linux community, specifically on Lemmy, are these: Linux is not "just easier" and depressingly still not ready for the average consumer unwilling to tinker. The overwhelming majority of complaints about Windows so frequently posted here are solved problems that people pretend are entirely unfixable, or refuse to learn how to fix. For many people venting about their computer, it would be easier to direct them how to fix what they have rather than try to use it as an opportunity to push your religion OS of choice.

    If you can manage Linux, I promise that "fixing" a Windows install is well within your reach. Plenty of problems with it, but "broken"? "Unusable"? Take a look outside at the majority of the world, or even the fucking Steam user statistics and get back to me on that. More than good enough for the overwhelming majority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    This fuckin line

    Childhood me: "Whats he mean by that?"

    My parents: "[explains slavery]"

    Me: ...

    Them: ...

    Thanks, Disney!

    I still love the soundtrack.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    Is there a technical reason that Linux apps can't/don't just pop up an authenticator thing asking for more privileges like Windows apps can do? Why does nano just say that the file is unwriteable instead of letting me increase the privileges?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Some do. I'm sure it is possible with terminal programs. In KDE, you do get authenticator pop-ups.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Hmm I just tried editing some systemd service with Kate and it did actually give me an authenticator popup when I tried to save it

    Although then the prompt expired and now it does nothing when I try to save it. Restarted Kate and now it works again...

    I haven't tried that before

    When I try to go into the sudoers.d folder tho it just says I can't, and the same thing happens when I try to open the sudoers file in Kate. If I try to copy and paste a systemd service in dolphin tho it just says I don't have permission and doesn't give a prompt.

    lol if I open it with nano through sudo it says 'sudoers is meant to be read only'

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    With arch+xfce4 I mostly don't. Except for when I do systemctl reload in a cli without sudo and it pops a surprise elevation password request gui in my face. I haven't figured out what makes it behave like that.

    I use Arch btw 👉🧐 eats booger

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    That’s the result of polkit (policy kit) authentication agents. These are typically DE-specific for their GUIs.

    pkexec is comparable to sudo and can be used from the terminal to get the graphical prompt for elevated commands.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Linux apps follow simplicity principles. If you don't have permission to delete a file, why assume you may know the password of the user who has permission?

    You can preface sudo to any command to execute it with root privileges, which would be similar to running as admin in windows.

    Graphical apps do tend to ask for authentication if it makes sense. No userland apps should need more permissions than the current user's in order to run.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Small pedantic correction, but you can’t preface every command with sudo; only executables can be invoked with sudo as it can’t elevate your current shell. Naturally, the way to execute non-executables such as builtin routines as root is to just spawn into a root shell with sudo su.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The GUI apps do (depends on your DE). Terminal apps like nano are designed to work without fancy desktop stuff, like Polkit. Any sort of graphical text editor should prompt you for your password.

    systemctl still asks for a password, though. Because it's systemd, and it's part of everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    sudo chown <username> <file>
    
    chmod 700 <file>
    

    Don’t see a problem ;) /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "TakeOwnership Registry Hack" PSA. It just werks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    sudo stinking effer!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Ah ah ah! You didn’t say the magic word!

    sudo edit the file!

    …

    Ah ah ah! You didn’t say the secret word right after!

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Visual representation of the first time I ever saw "owner: nobody"

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • "Own me? Maybe my physical form - but I don't have to do shit for you if you don't treat me with respect! Want to edit that file without my permission? Go ahead and do it yourself - take a magnetic needle and open up the HDD case yourself!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    So... Go try that and notice Windows is basically always encrypted at rest nowadays.

    You can always decap your TPM and use a STM to read the static charges on its memory... But, good luck doing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›