What would a FOSS dating app look like?

top 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 11 months ago

I feel like it would be almost impossible for the app ti reach critical mass in any local area

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    As an experiment - try setting up a dating community on Lemmy - report back with how that goes.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    Do lemmons even need a dating community?

    This isn't a dig at Lemmy users

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    I think it would be mostly men. I like the idea of it though.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    how many straight women do you know that are FOSS?

    even among men, how many care about FOSS? like .1%?

    I know what Foss is, but I don't care about it. but i do find it amusing the how superiority complex FOSS people have and how they fail to realize how the average windows/mac users is just going to find that weird and offputting, as they do most foss software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    how many straight women do you know that are FOSS?

    Straight? None. I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm just saying there is a very heavy skew towards men.

    even among men, how many care about FOSS? like .1%?

    Not many, I already said the app likely wouldn't work.

    but i do find it amusing the how superiority complex FOSS people have and how they fail to realize how the average windows/mac users is just going to find that weird and offputting

    How does my comment demonstrate a superiority complex? Why are you even participating in this conversation if you don't care about it? Clearly you're not the intended audience here. I'm not saying this to be a dick or anything? I just genuinely don't understand why. Also, I haven't failed to realize anything, I'm very aware of what the rest of the world thinks of me and the foss people. I don't give a fuck. You should try not giving a fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    "David has requested your public key, do you accept?"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Same. I installed it on my phone but in the end, I'm still stuck with the dilemma if I go through with giving them my data/info or not. At this point, I'd have better luck just loitering around Target and asking someone out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Exactly this. Since it does not seem to be federated, you're still forced to give your data to a third party you can't choose. And this makes the open source aspect a rather marginal benefit, at least for the privacy-concerned end user. Still, I appreaciate the effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    would be cool for meeting local foss nerds, if theres any

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

    having a lot of people on it would be the thing that makes it good.

    for real though, here's my formula to fix a major dating app problem:

    1. women can swipe men, but men cannot swipe women
    2. men can view and chat with women who have swiped them

    now I can simply look cool, instead of trying to swipe 500 girls for an hour

    no for-profit dating app will ever do this, because it means that men are not swiping 500 girls for an hour

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    Maybe add a feature where if someone is chatting with >10 people, they aren't shown for swiping? I don't know exactly what the limit should be, but I feel like the apps use 'hot' profiles that attract people and make them swipe a lot that won't lead anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    95% of your male users would have zero swipes on the app, and then stop using it

    and most of the women will swipe on 5% of the men, and also leave because those 5% of men will only respond to like 5% of the swipes they get, so 95% of them get shafted.

    and this is why dating apps don't work. people don't use them logically or reasonably. dating is all about chasing hot people who won't give you the time of day and ignoring people who would actually date you because they are not as attractive as the people who ignore you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    95% of your male users would have zero swipes on the app, and then stop using it

    and most of the women will swipe on 5% of the men

    so it's the same result as the current tinder system, except im not swiping 500 girls for an hour. yea, it sounds good

    the app could give the guy some performance metrics. view count, swipe ratio. he can make tweaks to his profile, a/b test. it could actually be pretty interesting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    the tinder system doesnt' show you how 99.9% of women are rejecting you. just like the lottery, the point is the delusion that you might 'win' even though statistically, you won't ever.

    if the average user saw that reality, they'd give up. they would not try to improve.

    apps can't fix biological imperatives. all they do is magnify them. i'm a guy who gets matches on apps regularly... most women interpret my profile as the complete opposite of what it says. it's hilarious. but that's because people see what they want to see, they don't see what you literally tell them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    Gay perspective:

    You must have a face pic of you within the last decade first. After that, anything goes.

    Ads are reduced from appearing once every 5 taps to once every time you launch the app. At most. Go away. My hands are busy. That’s why I’m here.

    If you use a VPN, you never see ads, and if you route porn traffic and Tiannamen square footage you get free membership forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    i don't mind holding back the face reveal until after a chat and vibe check. it makes sense given how many men want to minimize the risk of being seen by coworkers, especially in more conservative societies. but i hear your perspective from people a lot also

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    This is very heteronormative and gender binaried. Queer people exist and date.

    That said, anecdotally, from the handful of women I've talked about this with: many don't like making first moves on these apps.

    Using dating apps is a skill, and if you haven't been practicing sending messages you're going to be bad at it. The vast majority of first messages I got from women were "hey". Trash tier. Probably because they just haven't done it very often.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    This is very heteronormative and gender binaried

    it's an idea meant to address a problem which is specific to the heteronormative gender binaried online dating experience. it probably wouldn't do anything to improve other dating configurations

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    My wife wouldn't be thrilled..

    Well, if we weren't doing it together.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Hopefully none of that "subscribe to see more matches" bs

    Oh, and one of the generic message prompts is "What Linux distro do you use?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Literally just a dating app without the hidden algo that keeps people onboard and no payment. It could be federated.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Sure, why not.

    What would it look like? Same as the others, text field for description, pictures, interests.

    If it's foss, I would want to see a https://reproducible-builds.org/ or some other method of verifying the accuracy of the process. Getting no matches would be better than the fake stuff the others do.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago
    [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Instead of assessing compatibility I assume it would include ideological purity tests.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Nah, In person for the win!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I have had this idea in my mind of building a privacy-first, open source dating app built on "privacy by design" principles. Still didn't get to it tho.

  • source
  • What it would look like is a badly themed badly optimized front end that isn't in the App store, was recently removed from the Play store, with a rape awful name like CLIT or CL Isn't Tinder or LibreMeetCute and a nonsense icon. It would rapidly become recognized as the engine used by the huge number of extremely sketchy personals sites that popped up all of a sudden that contain only virtual prostitutes. It would also be the engine that powers Truth Romance. It would have the worst Github issues page in human history.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    I don't think I'm into dating apps

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Allowing you to meet meet people more like yourself!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    My two cents on dating apps in general:

    1. I would rather have something that actually marks someone as willing to have a relationship instead of clinging to people that for some reason are not available; maybe I'm just lazy of knowing people, but on the other side it skips some hurdles and puts me on contact with someone I might have taken a long time to know, if at all;
    2. on the other side, dating apps really reward someone physically attractive or at least that uploads the best photos. I've met several people who in person are alright for me which I wouldn't swipe if I met them in an app. Also, after I actually paid a professional photographer to shoot a set of me and uploaded the pics on apps, I received more likes in a single week than during my entire life, even though nothing fundamentally changed and I'm still the same.
  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Rather do Matrimonial Tech meet

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    What would that even look like?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Lol it would be spammed by bots I think. And hard to moderate. I will pity any moderator who has to moderate such a platform.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    The problem is most people are lazy and don't understand anything. They just use the app they know, even if it sucks.

    If you got it to be popular it could work , but I don't see how you could.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    It would be like old-school OKCupid, minus all the paid bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    old school okcupid was from 2004, before video on the internet meant a 320x240 quicktime clip that was 2 minutes long.

    nobody in 2026 is ever going to use the internet like we did in 2004. they don't have the patience or the attention span. it also would be a phone app, not a website. nobody uses websites anymore

  • source
  • parent