Donald Trump announced Friday that he was scrapping U.S. tariffs on beef, coffee, tropical fruits and a broad swath of other commodities — a dramatic move that comes amid mounting pressure on his administration to better combat high consumer prices. 

Trump has built his second term around imposing steep levies on goods imported into the U.S. in hopes of encouraging domestic production and lifting the U.S. economy. His abrupt retreat from his signature tariff policy on so many staples key to the American diet is significant, and it comes after voters in off-year elections this month cited economic concerns as their top issue, resulting in big wins for Democrats in Virginia, New Jersey and other key races around the country.

all 79 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 177 points 1 year ago (7 children)

as if that's all it took to lower prices. companies are gonna look at this as 'free profit' and keep them high, pocketing the 'savings' for as long as they can.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah, the prices won't go down unless forced

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    To be fair to corrupt corporations, they already bought the beef and coffee at tariffed prices, so they have to sell that stuff before the prices can go down. Unless they get a refund (not gonna happen), that's the way things work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Can't be, he's been exclaiming how groceries were already lowered.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    They're gonna pay us for groceries!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Strange word that, groceries. People are saying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I mean, let's just sit back and observe the stupidly obvious fact that Trump is lowering tariffs to lower grocery store prices, which necessarily confirms Trump knows that creating tariffs raised the grocery store prices, despite that he has said the exact opposite.

    So tell me, mainstream media: Did we do it? Did we catch Trump in a lie so logically incontestable that your reporters would feel empowered to finally report it as a "lie"?

    [Scans article]

    ...sigh.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    They can't say 'lie.' It's one of the few words you can basically never use as a journalist.

    It's not about the incontestability of the truth. It's about the fact that a 'lie' (as opposed to a 'falsehood') requires intent. Basically, unless you have psychic powers, or a written, signed declaration from the person saying "Yes, I intentionally lied," you can't prove it's a lie. And in journalism, you do have to be able to prove the things you say. Potentially in a court of law.

    He could just be stupid. He could just be ignorant. He could just be suffering from serious mental decline. We don't know for sure.

    I get that's not a satisfying answer. We all know, intuitively, that Trump lies, constantly and endlessly. He tells himself ten lies in the morning just to get out of bed. I get it. We all know it. But journalism has to be held to a higher standard, and that standard has to be applied consistently, not just when it suits us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Yes, all well and good, and upvoted for the rational response of course.

    I understand there are standards. But the enemy of the good is the perfect, and if journalistic standards require perfect evidence and won't otherwise represent the best-fit explanation, then they are easily exploited by bad actors like Trump who will intentionally withhold perfect evidence. The public good is served by reporting from a reasonable person's perspective what the most likely explanation is, including the terminology that goes with it. Here, that is a "lie."

    I'd also argue their concern in this case isn't standards, but legal liability for defamation. At least from a legal perspective, reporters and publications have clear defenses at this point to saying "lie" since regardless of subjective momentary intent, the preponderance of people / jurors should accept contextual evidence of intent like his prior statements.

    And even journalistic standards should be addressable by calling it something like an "apparent" lie to allow the possibility of other explanations, while still calling it what it almost certainly is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    I see the logic, but it's still just excuses. The intensity of words matter to be accurate or to water down. Currently they are watering down. Saying it's to keep integrity while the country falls apart and also while being caught with more flagrant absences of integrity is just hypocritical theatrics and people are right to judge them for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Weird, I was assuming that adding tariffs on coffee would magically create plantations of coffee in Wyoming

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Wyoming is already full of bigots, no space to plant coffee trees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Wyoming isn't full of anything, the entire state has the population of a mid sized town.

    Why are Republicans always so attracted to rural areas with low population density? So that they don't have to deal with other Republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Who'd have thought... the recomendations for how to lower prices... were, to stop doing those things everyone told him would raise prices and he swore up and down wouldn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    This guy fucks everything up, then wants us to praise him for unfucking one or two things he himself fucked up.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It's not even necessarily unfucking either. When distributors and producers learn a new higher price consumers will pay, it's very easy for them to default to that price. They can just increase prices to match what it was with tariffs and nothing changes except more profit for the producers. We consumers wouldn't even realize it since we're so far removed from the source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Costs of goods hasn't been a meaningful part of final cost of a product in a long time. Companies have been using minor cost increases to justify major price increases for a while now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Regardless of whether it's the producer or someone else along the supply chain, the prices are able to stay up because the consumer will pay the increase price. At the source or not, that's my only point

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago

    Yeah except the damage is already done. The issue is every time he does this shit the countries that aren't able to import to America go elsewhere and start up in those countries. If they already established why the fuck would they come back and risk the loss again off the tariff rug pull? It's not only logical it's a better business move to just stick where you are where the market is going to be stable. This is what happened to the soy farmers.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago

    The Art of the TACO.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Lol. The prices arent gonna go down. They just might not keep going up.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I mean there might be some merit. The ghost writer did everything and got their name on the title. That said I'm still going to pass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Trump causes problems then causes more by trying to fix them.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm sure the Argentinean cattle ranchers appreciate his efforts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    Oh so the tariffs aren't making us rich?

    But I thought that's what he and his dickheads in charge said!

    Oh well, I am positive all his supporters will find a way to pin this on Biden and the radical liberal left I keep hearing so much about. They just gotta wait for Fox News to tell them how to feel first.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago
    [–] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Hey dipshit MAGA subhumans, guess what?

    spoilerThey ain't going to lower the prices. They're going to pocket the difference because people are already paying it. You did this. Have a merry Christmas you cockroach filth covered animals.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Remember when grocery store prices wouldn't decline after covid and the Biden administration started investigating grocery chains?

    Well, fat fucking chance of prices dropping even if the tariffs disappear.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Shame that trading partners are already all adapting away from the unstable and untrustworthy tRump regime, who the fuck wants to rely on trade with someone who can completely change their spongy dementia addled mind at the slightest perceived offense or even imagined ones, or their mood that day... or the weather... Honestly, this will not have the desired outcome for Americans because tRump poisoned the well already with his self-serving, corrupt horseshit.

    He wasn't lying when he said the tariffs were great for 'us', he just wasn't talking about the same 'us' the public thinks he is. He's talking about himself and a few oligarch business associates who are cannibalizing the country with his gleeful permission. It's not that he's too dumb to see they're playing him, it's that he DOESN'T CARE about America, at all. Perhaps he even hates America for being rejected by the elite for decades on end. He's a bitter, wrathful, closeted gay diva, and he is only happy when you personally are suffering. It's the disappointment of the millennium that so many American people are blind to this, or willfully ignorant because they still somehow buy the lie that it could be them getting into the club and being one of the rich and powerful who can do anything they want and not have to care about their peers.

    Don't quit your job, save your money, and buy raw ingredients so you can cook your own food, cause the damage he's done to trade is not going to fade fast enough for bullshit gestures like putting out the fire he started himself to have an impact that favours working Americans. Stay strong, and find ways to get his shit-encrusted and rotting carcass out of office before a complete collapse is upon you and the entire world suffers. That goes for the criminally liable enablers calling themselves the republican party, too. Don't forget corporate plants in the Democratic party.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    The Amazon Prime Day strategy. Increase prices for a while then reduce the prices to “slightly higher than they were originally” and claim you’re doing a favor.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Clearly trump knows what he is doing, he is after all the smartest, bestest person ever born. So smart

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But, he said the tariffs would just naturally lower the cost of everything, all by themselves. And there's just no way he would lie about something like that. /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    So this means prices are going to go down, right? Right? And not that corporations will just keep the pricing and increase their profit.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Thwts so you dont talk about his love for Democate sausage

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Masterful gambit, sir.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    Is he still president? After he broke all these laws, and helped a Nazi kill all these people? You guys gotta vote!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Do you think we can just vote whenever we want?

    Like, "Wow, the last 10 months have been awful! That's it. I've had enough. I'm going to go vote against him today."

    That's not how voting works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    Go vote bro! That's what people here told me, when I said they should dethrone Trump.

    Ps: Waiting for the downvotes again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • 24 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    18 comments in c/economics@lemmy.world view that post
    2 comments in c/conservative@sh.itjust.works view that post