all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 22 points 1 year ago*

I argue with the genie that they actually promised to grant me infinite wishes

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Genie - it's always 3 wishes clearly the genie misspoke

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My father, and the argument would be about his political views. Radicalized years ago but the taking heads on Fox.

    I miss my dad. 😔

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The genie that I have infinite wishes obviously

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The universe would break because it's the equivalent of winning a chess match against a pigeon who does nothing but shit all over the board

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Lotto cashier. "I'm definitely going to hit the jackpot on this one, ya big dummy."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wow. You're good at this.

    I'm going to use my wish to talk you into hiring me as your personal driver for like a year, so I can learn your wisdom.

    That's so well played.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Maybe myself (as an experiment), or the genie about if I should get more wishes or something. Wasting universe-altering magic on convincing one person seems like a waste.

    Edit: To be more clear about the self argument:

    You can do a lot of funny stuff with logical constructs. If you say "exclusively, [wish] or this statement is false" it's a paradox unless the wish is true. If I argue with someone else, them misunderstanding could count as a victory, but if I'm on both sides that's a bit harder. It's possible I just die or explode or something, but maybe it will actually work, too.

    You can get way more sophisticated with that, and probably should if you only get one shot. Godel's incompleteness theorem is a famous example of that kind of tortured self-reference. Magical evaluation of a single arbitrary statement is just way more OP than it may seem at first.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well, you may win the argument against the genie, but it doesn't guarantee that the genie would be granting you more wishes--because maybe they just can't (the universe itself might not let it or something).

    Just like some convenience store clerk agreeing that your coupon should be accepted, but the higher-ups won't--and she can't pay for it because she's got even less money than you do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Even if there's a risk of failure, it seems worth it. No one person is very important, and even then the more powerful a person is the less accessible they are. (Since nobody has mentioned it, Xi Jinping probably has the most power right now, not Trump. The US is stronger, but Trump still has the remnants of a democracy in his way, and is not personally intelligent)

    If there's genies, maybe there's a chance arguing with God would work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I agree~ And thus I would agree that arguing with God ("I can do a better job than you!") might be worth a shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd be careful with the wording - God could agree you'd be better but do nothing about it.

    Maybe you could write an open letter calling for people to be altruistic in general and that would count.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I argue that American Conservatives should all commit suicide with Trump on Truth Social.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Horseshoe theory in action here.

    Wishing death on 150+ million people because of their political beliefs doesn’t make you righteous. You’ve looped all the way around to becoming the exact thing you claim to oppose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    IF by winning you mean that everyone listening agrees with me, then I'll take on anyone on Fox News.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What does winning mean in this case? That every single person watching that debate concludes that I was right and the other person was wrong? What about if I'm objectively wrong? Do I still win?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I should be given uncontested control of the world's resources for 1 year.

    My opponent: the mother Gaia.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, this really depends on what you meant by winning here. Are we actually changing the other person's mind or do they admit we are right, but still believe otherwise? Are people who witness the argument included? Do people continue to agree indefinitely? Does it change reality to match?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I don't care who I'll be arguing with, but the disagreement will center on the hour and manner of Trump's inevitable demise.

    I'm thinking a trauma-induced stroke, caused when JD Vance has a sudden epileptic fit and bites off Donny Jr. in the Lincoln bedroom.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    [Dictator’s name] Orbán/Trump/Xi/etc…

    On TV

    And the argument is about them not being able to rule the country

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'd argue the genie wants to do everything I wish, regardless of the amount of individual wishes.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Definitively? Like everyone agrees I won the argument and it causes anyone who witnessed it to rethink their stance on the topic and actually fucking change the way they think and behave? An occurrence so rare I'd might as well play the lottery?

    If that were true... I guess I'd argue Donald Trump about addressing and curbing Climate Change...and second choice would be arguing Elon Musk on the merits of developing actual empathy.

    Genie wishes...pipe dreams in a lamp, lol. Anyways, thanks for inducing a small indulgence in some fantasy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think you would have to argue with quite a few people to even get access to trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Frivolous lawsuit against the government or a FAANG company

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't want to argue with anyone. Can I have cake instead?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)