top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 195 points 1 year ago (38 children)

I think it's a bit harsh to lay all the blame on google, considering the iPad exists.

Same shit different bucket.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    It is more basic than that:

    "It just works" is terrible for developing computer skills.

    It is damned convenient for the most part, but it removes the opportunity to have an issue and solve it, developing your troubleshooting skills.

    Then we come to the lack of verbosity of modern operating systems and programs.

    "Oops, there is an issue, please wait while we solve it..." is an absolutely terrible error message.

    "Error 0x001147283b - Fatal error" is a far better error message.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I agree with the the sentiment of your comment, but I think both error codes aren't great.

    I want error logs or descriptions, not a cryptic code that the Company selling the OS can choose not to document publicly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Have you ever worked in an environment powered by Windows-based computers, and Microsoft software? Have you ever spoken with any user in such an environment about their experience with errors like the ones you described, and how easy or difficult it was to solve them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I am not doing the whole passive aggressive argument where you refuse to say what your issue is and hold a clear conversation so you can try and seem like the winner and claim that I am an idiot because you have misunderstood my comment.

    But to answer the specific questions posted:

    Have you ever worked in an environment powered by Windows-based computers, and Microsoft software?

    Yes, it has been my job for fifteen years.

    Have you ever spoken with any user in such an environment about their experience with errors like the ones you described, and how easy or difficult it was to solve them?

    Not only do I speak with them several times a workday, I am usually the one solving said problems meaning I get to experience it all.

    My point stands, I don't even see yours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Fair enough, and I appreciate the clarification. That actually reinforces my point. You and I both work with people who use Windows daily and encounter these verbose errors—but they almost never understand them. They don’t use these messages to develop troubleshooting skills—they just get stuck and frustrated.

    So while I get the appeal of a detailed error message in theory, in practice, it doesn’t help most users learn anything. If anything, it just creates more dependency on people like us to fix things for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Thank you for accepting my initial rant, I am all for a proper discussion.

    I get what you mean, and while true that most people won't get better at troubleshooting because of a verbose error message, even back in the Windows 95/98 days where you had verbose error messages, most people would still not be capable of understanding them, myself included at that time.

    But my point is that the small minority of people who would start troubleshooting the stuff, myself included these days, would be vastly more helped by a verbose error message than a generic "Whops! Something went wrong, please wait!"

    Modern software are not even giving people the same initial chances to troubleshoot the issue as older software did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Oh, on that I totally agree. And not just with Microsoft with everything I run into Microsoft is especially bad because their attitude seems to we need to do something. You don’t need to know what it is and we’re not gonna tell you how long it takes so just fuck right off Which is monumentally annoying of course Apple does give a bunch of code and stuff for errors when something goes wrong and you can send it the developers, and I have never taken the time to try to figure out what any of that stuff is because I am not gonna be able to fix whatever it is and so I’m not gonna take the time. However, in my line of work where I’m supervising a lot of file ingestion people, data, architects, and software engineers, it definitely behooves me to understand what the errors I’m seeing with our own in-house proprietary products are. It’s especially frustrating when some of the higher up software engineers want to exclude me from meetings about the products going down because they claim it’s too technical for me. It’s not, of course, it’s not even the real reason; they just want to exclude me because they’re afraid of sharing their weaknesses or something. I have completely figured out what they are worried about yet, but it’s maddening.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 108 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    I'd argue the iPad is the bigger offender personally. They're blaming Chromebooks because that's often what schools provided, but the same exact timing existed before with iMacs in classrooms all through the 90s and early 00s for millennials despite Windows being by far the more common real world OS they would need to know in the workplace.

    But when it comes to portable devices the iPhone and iPad are king, that's what young people want and often what they're given. And those operate nearly exactly the same as a Chromebook. Toss everything into a cloud bucket, no user-facing folder structures to learn, everything locked down with limited access and customization. A take it or leave it approach to user interaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I have user-facing folder structures on every iOS device I own. What exactly is the extent of your personal experience using iOS?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    My experience with iOS devices is mostly non-jailbroken devices, where the file system is not accessible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Not trying to be rude but the files app is absolutely not giving you anything close to full access to your devices file system. It's an abstraction over the actual file system if anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

    Just to get this straight: you're comparing the complexity of using OS X to Chrome OS. I hope you're not also claiming you've actually used both of these?

    Edit: also, what do you mean "no user-facing folder structures to learn"? iPadOS I get because even though it has one and has for years, it's not required. But again: have you ever used Chrome OS? I would sooner use TempleOS, and somehow you still managed to make an invalid criticism of such a dogshit operating system.

    Edit 2: 23 downvotes; 0 explanations of how I'm wrong. Stay classy, Lemmy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The original commenter compared ipados to chromeos, and they compared osx to windows, I never saw a comparison from osx to chromeos.

    The point being made is that modern operating systems often times in the hands of kids (chromeos and ipados) are designed to abstract away much of the underlying elements of the os.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    They absolutely compared OS X to Chrome OS by directly comparing what Apple did in the 90s and 00s to what Google did in the 10s. If you take the comment as its own isolated thing, sure; if you understand it as a response to another comment (which it is), then the comparison is smacking you in the face.

    What planet am I on right now? Should this conversation be about media literacy instead of tech literacy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It is rich that you are suggesting this should be about media literacy. How do you connect "what apple did on the 90s" and "what chrome OS did in the 00s" (which it was the 10s, not the 00s) as a direct comparison between operating systems? What the commenter is suggesting is that both google and apple had a hand in making students not prepared to interact with technology, not that they did it in the same way.

    I don't even agree with that statement as I believe being exposed to macs at school (and likely windows at home) woild be beneficial to tech literacy. But you couldn't even comprehend enough to engage with the point. They were saying macos is not windows, and windows is what kids should be learning. Then you come in and yell and scream about mac being better than chrome.

    You were down voted because you were wrong and an asshole

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    How do you connect "what apple did on the 90s" and "what chrome OS did in the 00s" (which it was the 10s, not the 00s) as a direct comparison between operating systems?

    Because they're directly saying that Apple did with Macintosh what Google did with Chromebooks and that wasn't a problem for real-world tech literacy.

    What the commenter is suggesting is that both google and apple had a hand in making students not prepared to interact with technology, not that they did it in the same way.

    Except that they're using iMacs as a precedent that dumbed-down Chromebooks didn't (at least substantially) harm tech literacy. My interpretation is somehow a generous one, because the other interpretation is that they're comparing the iMac being complex but different from the industry standard to Chrome OS being dumbed down. These are two vastly different things.

    I comprehended enough: either option is stupid as fuck – just one indicates a lack of evidence while the other indicates a lack of basic logic.

    You were down voted because you were wrong [...]

    I'm wrong? Yeah, I originally said "00s and 10s" for Chrome OS because I thought it came out in 2008, but I looked it up and corrected myself yesterday(?) to just "10s" – completely incidental to the point of my comment. Did you notice too that OS X didn't exist in the 90s but I called it that anyway for simplicity? No? Oh, that's right: no one actually gives a shit.

    Meanwhile, they're spouting provable and obvious misinformation about how Chrome OS doesn't have a user-facing folder system, so I think your explanation for why I was downvoted should leave out "I was wrong". Clearly the voters didn't give a shit about factual accuracy. I'm sure the other commenter used Chrome OS enough to judge it when they're saying that. Weird how you didn't address the part of my comment correcting transparent misinformation.

    You were down voted because you were [...] an asshole

    I was an asshole. And any mixture of "wrong" and "an asshole" gets blind upvotes on Lemmy all the time. No, what got me downvotes is that Lemmy doesn't have Reddit's hidden votes feature that stops a cascade of morons blindly downvoting anything that's at negative (I was at +2, -23 when I made my second edit; just acknowledging that blind, uncritical downvoting took that ratio from ~1:11 to ~1:3). And I'll continue being a condescending asshole until this Lemmy equivalent of boomers giving one star to businesses they've never been to – because Google asked them to rate their experience – is dead.

    Have a nice day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Based on this small exchange it seems like you erect straw men to knock down to inflate your intellectual self worth which is incredibly fragile based on how much you freaked out over a tiny correction that I didn't use at all in my argument.

    If you are actually interested in engaging with the topic try harder to read what I have said

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The 00s thing was the only demonstrably wrong part of my comment, and it was long-since corrected when you commented. So I asked why – when you argued that "being wrong" was a key component of the heavy downvotes – you took an aside for that yet conspicuously didn't mention how the comment with a 10:1 ratio spends half its length confidently spouting complete, easily disprovable bullshit about user-facing folder structures.

    Seems more like a mix of anchoring bias, the bandwagon effect, and a disregard for critical thinking than it does factual accuracy, unless the tone policing component swamps everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Yes, you were wrong that the original poster was suggesting that mac is the same as chrome is in its structure. They were instead saying macos contributed to poor tech skills just as chrome OS is now. and iPads also contribute to this as Chromebooks do now. They can both contribute to the same cause even if they do it in different ways. Nowhere did they ever come close to mention macos is just as garbage as chrome OS. You added that bit in yourself to strawman. Therefore being "demonstrably wrong"

    And that was the entire substance of my discussion, how you were mistaken about the central point.

    You are also wrong about the folder structure piece. While yes chromeos technically contains a folder structure and also allows for the user to interact with it. The whole damn operating system is designed around you not needing to do that, in nearly the exact same way phones are. There's a reason that college professors in computer science departments are so confused why their students don't know how to use folder structures, and I'd wager quite a lot that chromeos has a large part to play.

    So there you go two demonstrable wrongs that have nothing to do with you missing a date

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Probably not so much that you’re wrong as you just sound like a condescending dick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    No smarm this time: my question was 100% genuine. I actually don't know how you can use these operating systems and draw those conclusions. This feels like they ate someone else's half-baked opinions left out overnight, got food poisoning, and threw them up into this comment.

    Also, in my opinion, being condescending is the correct response to people confidently spewing complete, easily disprovable bullshit. I confidently get things wrong sometimes too, but I'm getting really sick of this "I'm qualified to speak on everything" culture that social media is exacerbating.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Huh? I used ChromeOS and Mac OS for work, study and play and I can't honestly say one is particularly more simplistic or even user-friendly (dumbed-down) than the other. But ChromeOS is significantly less locked down overall in that getting root access on the device is much, much simpler.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
    • The thing about root access is just objectively untrue. These are the steps to gain root access on macOS as provided by Apple. Meanwhile, I can find no official tutorial from Google, and more importantly, enabling developer mode wipes your Chromebook. I legitimately cannot imagine what on god's green Earth you did to make the macOS process more painstaking than wiping your device.
    • Even if your premise weren't demonstrably untrue, this isn't a discussion about what you can theoretically do with a device; it's about the kind of workflow the device would encourage for a typical student using it. In this regard, a Chromebook is massively dumbed down. Sure you might dip into the downloads folder, but Chrome OS by design encourages the use of web apps as much as humanly possible and severely restricts your ability and incentives to meaningfully interact with your OS outside of a browser.
    • Even assuming that the process of gaining root access mattered to this discussion (it categorically doesn't), what you can and cannot do with that root access would matter far more, and in that unrelated discussion, macOS clearly still wins out (unless you'd want to argue that developer mode lets you install Linux, at which point this is no longer about Chrome OS).
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Meanwhile, I can find no official tutorial from Google

    This is such an unserious strawman of an argument, how do you not get embarrassed writing this?

    There's no official tutorial for most Android devices either, it doesn't mean it's harder to do than on Apple devices.

    Even if your premise weren't demonstrably untrue

    Just saying something is so doesn't make it so, to demonstrate my premise is untrue you have to actually demonstrate how it's untrue, which you have not done.

    it's about the kind of workflow the device would encourage for a typical student using it

    You mean like how Mac OS is locked to the Mac OS App Store by default only, featuring mainly proprietary payware unless you toggle an obscure bypass in the settings, while ChromeOS lets you run any unsigned code for ChromeOS, Linux and Android with minimal effort, all of which are either fully or partially open source and comes with a web browser equipped with a nice set of easily accessible Dev tools, which allows you to examine and learn how web applications are written, architectured and deployed - the largest by far aspect of computer science and software development most people come into contact with regularly?

    Even if the conversation was about what you say, you would still be wrong. But it's not about that, because in a school scenario both would be locked down with an MDM - in Apple's case literally via serial numbers and network connectivity DRM you can't realistically block.

    And no, this conversation is actually not about that either. A user repairable device doesn't become less repairable if it discourages your 12 year old from popping out and eating the battery.

    severely restricts your ability and incentives to meaningfully interact with your OS outside of a browser.

    Any examples on this one, chief? Or you just saying things like that will magically make them true again?

    Even assuming that the process of gaining root access mattered to this discussion (it categorically doesn't),

    Of course it does. Really it's the thing that matters the most.

    Sorry but your bailey castle isn't any more secure than your motte, because access to root is actual freedom over your device, anything less than actual unrestricted root access where I can say, replace the network stack or write and add my own kernel modules for hardware support I want to add or whatever reason I please is by definition not really software (and by extension hardware) I have control over. It's just another blackbox walled garden.

    what you can and cannot do with that root access would matter far more, and in that unrelated discussion, macOS clearly still wins out

    Again, do you have any evidence at all to back that up?

    And what's with this weird caveat?

    (unless you'd want to argue that developer mode lets you install Linux, at which point this is no longer about Chrome OS).

    It's some real specious reasoning to handwave the most core freedom of all - to simply replace/refuse the OS altogether and bring your own to your hardware, and highly convenient of course because Apple employs many anti-repair, anti-consumer, anti-modification practices from the very screws to their knock-off TPM (T2?) chip to hardware whitelists where everything is married down to the cables and each and every module for no reason other than to maintain control above all.

    Please apply more intellectual rigor next time.

    Fuck Google and fuck Apple, stop defending them, don't die on this silly hill and go be free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Have you even been reading this thread? This is about the level of tech literacy kids get from using an OS for school, not about what you're theoretically capable of doing. Yes, you're right, root access on both macOS and Chrome OS would be locked out in a school setting. That makes your braindead argument a non-starter for this discussion. Even if what you said about the rooting difficulty were true (again, showed it isn't), it could not possibly matter less here. And yes, I am going to say that official, step-by-step documentation that takes a few minutes at most to follow is easier than following some third-party website and then resetting your entire OS.

    Even in a situation where it's not locked down, neckbeards like you and I are in the vanishingly small minority of users who ever touch root access; when we're talking about generations of people being raised to be tech-illiterate, root access has fuck-all to do with that. Unless the OS is incentivizing average users to use root access enough that a sizable portion actually would (desktop Linux and nothing else), then a comparison of which OS gives easier root access couldn't be less relevant when talking about an entire generation of kids.

    Here, Chrome OS is meaningfully much worse than OS X for teaching kids tech literacy on the grounds that the average user experience is dumbed down to hell. Meanwhile:

    Fuck Google and fuck Apple, stop defending them

    Literally where? I've done nothing but lambast Chrome OS this entire thread except to correctly point out that it has user-facing folders which you do often interact with. Apple? By correctly pointing out that the Apple desktop ecosystem is massively less dumbed-down than Chrome OS, I'm defending them? Dude, I use Linux and Android (the latter begrudgingly; locked bootloader) and would never purchase an Apple product again for the foreseeable future; next time, save your sweaty, mouth-foaming screed about Apple bad for when you actually find someone who likes and supports Apple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I ain't reading all that.

    You are angry asf and need to chill tf out, restating your points over and over doesn't make them true, but it does make you sound like an aggro troglodyte.

    You need to back up your shit and learn to formulate actual arguments, not just arbitrary statements you keep repeating. Stop being an aggressively incorrect moron and start thinking.

    Neckbeards Mouth-foaming screed Braindead

    Speak for yourself bruh.

    Anyway, it's not very hard to understand:

    Root access = control of device, control of device = ability to experiment. Ability to experiment = potential for tech literacy. Potential for tech literacy = tech literacy

    Mac OS = locked down and dumbed down = tech illiteracy Chrome OS = Linux with chrome = tech literacy.

    Also, blocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Also, the total number of Chromebooks sold worldwide is tiny compared with phones and tablets. Most kids have probably never seen a Chromebook, but virtually every kid has held and used a phone, a tablet or both.

    If you want to blame Google, blame Android, not Chromebooks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I am pretty confident it's the smartphone OSs (Android and iOS) that are more at fault. I remember having to install a file browser on my smartphone. Kids grown up with smartphones may not even know there are files and folder structures.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, and I feel like you could play around with javascript to make stuff happen in the browser on a chrome book, can't you?

    I'm old enough that it was BASIC I played around with when I was a kid. Not a language I ever used since, but the important thing is to get a feel for logic, make some incredibly stupid choices when making a program and learn from that. If a kid wants to play around on a computer to make it do something they created, I think they'll find a way.

    Also AI can be helpful when starting on a new language. Yeah I had to learn the hard way by googling stuff and getting the syntax wrong, and using a lot of guess work. There's still a learning curve before you just know the syntax without stopping to think or asking the AI, but it was that way before, it was just googling things you gotta do before you really know it. And before that a lot more trial and error to figure it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    This is kinda a bad take imo. I don’t think it’s chrome books that has ruined tech literacy. Maybe it’s younger exposure to even more addictive social media than previous generations?

    I’m pretty young. My first mobile device was an iPod touch 4th gen. I figured out how to jailbreak it and I was like 12 at the time. If I ever felt one of these walled garden devices was holding me back, I enjoyed finding a creative solution around that. Since that iPod touch, I jailbroke my Wii and recently a kindle. I also modded a gameboy, but that was different than jailbreaking.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah it's a fucking abysmal take. More kids had access to the internet and computers because of Chromebooks, without them they'd have had nothing - maybe once an hour in the computer lab each week, assuming they even had one.

    Prior to Chromebooks, the most a school could do was "a computer in every classroom". That was it, that was the ambition in the early 2000's and even then most schools failed.

    What happened was tech companies made computers easier to use by hiding a lot of that complexity. And average humans were fine with that because shit should just work.

    The arguments being raised here about a loss of skills are the same arguments boomers used against millennials because they didn't know how to do DIY and shit like that.

    The blame is always squarely on the education system. That system is supposed to set kids up with the skills they need to make it in the wold and tech literacy is one of many, many areas that is hugely underserved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Before Chromebooks we had one aging computer lab that the entire school had to reserve and share. Kids never even learned to type. I was able to improve students typing ability before they hit High School.

    Because we had Chromebooks (that I raised money for with fundraisers) my students were able to learn to use digital data logging of science experiments using probes, my students were able to learn to design websites, I was able to teach them programming basics using Scratch, I was able teach kids basic IT management since I created a team of kids to assist with tech problems students and teachers had with their technology. I taught them CAD with TinkerCAD, I taught them video editing, I taught them image editing, etc.

    Chromebooks were amazing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Not to mention that Chromebooks are Linux (so can be modded for basically anything), but these days have official native support for sideloading any Linux distro you please. All it takes is a flashed USB drive and one button click, then you're totally unrestricted and out of ChromeOS.

    If any kid wanted to, they could do that far easier than I could when I was in school. If they become adults, buy a Chromebook, and choose to do nothing with it other than watch YouTube, then it has absolutely nothing to do with the technology that was provided to them during school.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Do you mean like booting off Linux or installing it? I was looking at installing Linux on Chromebooks and apparently it really depends on the model. Some have a physical screw that you open up the laptop and unscrew to install Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    The school doesn't let you do that. Because if you installed Linux you could install games, and then you might get distracted. Never mind the fact that YouTube is still completely available.

    I looked into this back when I was in school and there was some weird workaround found by someone on reddit that essentially forced it to do a complete factory reset. I didn't want to get in trouble for doing that, and if I did that I wouldn't have been able to connect to the wifi anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    What did you jailbreak your ipod with, though? Was it a chromebook?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Probably windows 🤮

    I think there were jailbreaks that could be done on device, but if I remember correctly this wasn’t one of them. I forget the exact year/iOS version. I wanna say I jailbroke 3 iOS versions in a row, and at that point new things had captured my interest. Eventually I found myself captivated with frontend development.

    You can find my latest work at https://blorpblorp.xyz/, the obviously best client for Lemmy and soon PieFed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So you had access to a fairly open device, where the system was considerably less restrictive than a Chromebook. Apparently many first time users don't have that luxury any longer. They're stuck with phones and chromebooks (phones with a keyboard slapped on, really). Good luck hacking anything with that locked up shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Someone else pointed out it’s not that difficult to boot Linux on your Chromebook off a thumb drive. A quick search shows it might be slightly complicated but seems pretty doable depending on your model.

    Listen I hate Google, but this still seems like a dumb take. There are better things to criticize them for: illegal monopolization of search through anticompetitive practices, making their search product worse on purpose, having no respect for people’s privacy, literally removing their slogan to not be evil, etc).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    As I said above, schools don't let you do that on their Chromebooks. Of course they could provide the same restrictions on other computers probably, so idk if blaming Google is the correct move.

    Although they would have to go as far as not allowing any external executables for it to be that locked down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What are the advantages of a jailbroken kindle? I’ve thought about it but there isn’t really anything I lack on mine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I jailbroke my Wii

    Yeah I've done this too. Beyond easy. There's literally a website with step-by-step instructions. I imagine it's the same for Kindle, etc.

    Googling how to jailbreak something is not the same as having an open and functional development environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You don't need to have a dev environment in order to be considered "tech literate".

    Just as a single example, an issue I've seen is that kids may not even understand what a file system is or how it works, because they're used to apps like Facebook or Google Drive which abstract away from the concept of a hard-drive, a User folder, file extensions, etc. Then they grow up putting photos on instagram, writing essays on Microsoft Word, and to them it's some unexplained internet magic. They never had first-hand experience with creating and modifying files on a local file system, and so they lack the understanding of what's going on behind the scenes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    may not even understand what a file system is or how it works ... which abstract away from the concept of a hard-drive, a User folder, file extensions, etc.

    What's funny is, filesystems, folders, file extensions are already abstractions, there is nothing inherently "right" about those particular abstractions, it's just what we've used for 40 some years... Before that, you might just have blocks on a disk, or a linear stream on a tape, and it was up to you to figure out what went where, and how to find it again. Point being, it's all just a sea of bits, regardless of how you organize them- the goal is to organize them in a way that you can forget the sea of bits.

  • source
  • parent
  • I use the old chrome book I have for writing. It was pretty easy to throw Linux on there. Was cheap when I bought it years ago, and still has like 10 hours of battery life. Just don't expect it to do much other than text processing and simple Web stuff.

    If I remember correctly, they're all core-boot-able, which is neat. Can't do that with most other laptops.

    Like, I see the problem, but my school actually gave out iPads, which I feel was worse. On the chrome book, you can at least access the file system and Linux.

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    First of all, this isn't enshitification as defined by Corey Doctorow. This has nothing to do with an internet platform getting worse because the priorities of the proprietors changed.

    I don't think it's entirely fair to blame Google for this. None of these companies do this for entirely altruistic reasons. At the core of the problem is funding in education. Google saw an opportunity and jumped on it. When given a choice that kids get no computer hardware vs. dumping price Chromebooks I would still vote Chromebook. Get your politicians to set aside less money for tanks and more money for education.

    Besides, no one is stopping kids from exploring other platforms. Google is looking for an infrastructure lock-in, get them locked in while they are young, but you can go do other stuff. It's also a question of financial means and interests. And they don't need to do LAN parties because they already have Fortnite and stuff. Life moves on. Your childhood was also markedly different from your parents'.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    The Chromebook does exactly what it says on the tin. It is a cheap notebook which runs Chrome. And it's fairly competent at that task. It's exactly as advertised. The problem only arises when people think that the ability to use a Chromebook is acceptable as a substitute for the ability to use a normal computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I think my kids are more accepting of Linux on the family PC because of their school chrome books. We'll see how it plays out when they start purchasing their own devices though.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I completely agree. The OP ignores the fact that Chromebooks run on Linux, and are essentially a gateway to it. There's even official support for sideloading any Linux distro of choosing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Have you ever used a chromebook?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes, it was a 2013 Chromebook and even back then they had these features

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Chromebooks that kids use at school aren't going to have Linux on them, nor will they have a useful terminal? The operating system abstractions kids learn with Chromebooks are basically useless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The Windows computers I used in school were locked down too, no terminal access or even basic settings. Google wants them to grow up and buy their own Chromebooks, and my point is that it is accessible then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, really, it was corporate social media, and also the smartphone (iphone particularly). They don't need to know anything anymore thanks to those two. I mean even MySpace had kids learning CSS at least.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    One of my first exposures to technology was an iPod touch, and I went on to become a software engineer. Maybe it was the time? Perhaps I’ve just become older and grumpier, but technology once felt inviting to me now feels oversaturated and unnecessary. Like do we really need ChatGPT? Does it really make things better or just solve other problems that technology created?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Good, I’m glad nobody is learning these things anymore. I couldn’t care less if someone doesn’t learn HTML and CSS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I'm not sure what's good about people losing the knowledge of the fundamentals of how things work

    How ironic is it to be against individual empowerment on the internet in lieu of dependency on corporate controlled outlets..... on the fucking fediverse?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    We do not agree that learning these arbitrary technologies constitutes individual empowerment.

    Are you worse off because you don’t understand machine language? This has nothing to do with capitalist bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Chromebooks fucked a generation of kids? Kids got cheap, hard to break, up to date, easy to replace laptops which ran a full desktop and even offered a Linux and android subsystem. Certainly not perfect but better than alternatives like the iPad or Windows S.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    I agree, and I think it takes almost MAGA level self-absorption to contrive this interpretation of events. What actually happened was somebldy wanted to sell products and came up with products people wanted. And that's not an all-encompassing endorsement of Google and everything Google has ever done because I'm "on Google's side", it's a criticism of OP's imagination.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago

    Chromebooks didn't do shit.

    It was tablets and phones replacing the home computer. Apple are equally complicit in this.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    I don't believe that.

    It's likely because the market has consolidated to a small number of companies who can dictate the means of production and how their consumers interact with their product.

    When the personal computer market was young, entries from all sorts of manufacturers flooded in. Some failed, some succeeded. Everything had to be configured by the user because universal standards hadn't been developed yet. This allowed for some people to be exposed to the back end, which have them some understanding of how their technology worked. It enhanced problem solving skills.

    If anything, 'Plug and Play" probably had more involvement in enshittification than Google. Taking out the problem solving and moving the goal to consumption.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Back in my day we brought our own MS-DOS boot disks to school to circumvent all the limitations.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    This seems silly. Lots of kids never learned about computers even when they were available. A chromebook was just an electronic school aid. If the interest was in computers they would learn about computers.

    I think this is a fairly dumb take. In the schools that I saw that had chromebooks a kid might be taking English, Math, AND computing. It really was up to the school (and parents) to introduce computing, not the machine that was the general replacement for books.

    Anecdotally: a high school near us requires every student to have a computer. They do not hand out chromebooks and the requirement specs are a higher end Mac or PC laptop that the kids are required to bring to classes. These kids use blender, maya 3d, office suite, video and music editing software for example. They absolutely do not know any more about computers then chromebook kids (with a few exceptions). Having access to a computer doesnt magically make them know about how computers work.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The real take is to get kids into PC gaming from a young age. Kids are super patient with each other and now my kid is doing things like installing mods for games that he plays. It's also massively improved his reading which is mostly how I learned English myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I can thank Minecraft for making me learn how to use the computer because I wanted to install mods and for learning English because Minecraft let's plays were like crack to 10 year old me and basically all of them were in English

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That's awesome, I love hearing stories like this. I was lucky to have access to a PC since I was about 8 years old and computer literacy is probably the most useful skill I have. Nothing teaches PC literacy better than pirating software with complex readmes lol or having to fix the family computer because you infected it with a virus. Had me stressing, looking at the task manager and searching for the origins of every .exe to find the culprit

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Probably a great way to get them comfortable with pc hardware too - want that new GPU? Here you go. Install it, you just get the one so be careful and learn how to do it right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is an incredibly dumb take. Tech isn't one dimensional and there isn't a "right" path to tech literacy. I grew up on Windows and I learned a lot of what I know by exploring my laptops and learning new things out of necessity. I ended majoring in CS in working in tech. My sister, who's 5 years younger than me, had Chromebooks growing up both at home and at school, yet she's also a very proficient CS major. Using Chromebooks doesn't show that someone is bad at tech, that's just a baseless assumption.

    Chromebooks are just another branch of tech, and there's really nothing wrong with them. They're basically Android tablets in laptop form. Google giving them to schools at a deeply discounted price is not a bad thing. Without them, many schools wouldn't have any sort of tech for their kids to work with. Chromebooks are incredibly useful tools that can enable teachers to incorporate material from the internet into their lessons and help streamline their work.

    Hating on things for the sake of hating on them is just lazy and counterproductive. There's a lot to criticize Google for, Chromebooks are not one of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Being a CS major (even a good one) isn't a solid measure of tech literacy. CS still suffers from the "do this arbitrary thing so you can get credit"; along with other majors and American schools at large.

    Actually I've seen first hand the dumbing down of curriculum in my CS program via my younger peers' stories, and helping them with their coursework. And it's 100% due to low tech literacy.

    Edit: grammar.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Not Android, Linux. I was trying to figure out why there are so few Android tablets and read that Google didn't have complete control with Android. That's why Samsung and HTC and others put their own overlay on it. They didn't want that for laptops/bigger devices, so for ChromeOS they locked it down and told the hardware manufacturers "no, it's ChromeOS. You can't fiddle with it. If you want to make Chromebooks, these are the minimum specs and this is the keyboard you must use. If not, fuck off."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is kind of like blaming car manufacturers for people not knowing how to drive manual and how cars work under the hood, because they made cars reliable and simple to use.

    There's always an incentive to make things more accessible. Skills always become outdated because of that. How many of us know how to skin game and cook it on naked fire? Not many, I presume.

    Chromebook for all its flaws and limitations still let children, who would not have otherwise used any computing device, at least use one.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I feel like this analogy is perfect, but not just for the reason you used it.

    Car manufacturers making cars easier to use and require less maintenance is great. Your point in regards to people just not needing the old skills because of that is spot on.

    But car manufacturers have also been making intentional design decisions to make accessing things under the hood require speciality tools or needlessly complex when it is needed. There are cars where you can't replace headlights without removing the whole front bumper assembly. That isn't the fault of the owner/user, and it's not a case of "improvements make old skills obsolete". It's design intentionally hostile to the goal of allowing owners to even attempt it themselves. Scummy as hell, and we should be holding these companies responsible.

    Google has done and is doing the same thing with Chromebooks and Android. File system? Folders to organize my files? What?

    And now we have people who don't know how to operate their car's headlights, and people who can't find files if they aren't in the "recent documents" list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    For sure, taking control away from the users is terrible and scummy, but I think it's an entirely different issue, covered by "right to repair". A very small amount of people had the know how and the confidence to perform the repairs themselves even before this anti consumer practices became so widespread, so I don't think it's a huge factor in decrease of skill. I would say a much bigger factor is the fact that technology has become exponentially more complex. You can't just open up a radio and replace a vacuum tube, everything is a microchip now, and the soldering iron isn't gonna help much there. I guess eventually we will reach technology complexity and abstraction of such a level that no single person can hold the knowledge to "fix" it on their own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Yup. I'm teaching my son CAD/CAM with a 3d printer, low level programming and electronics with Arduino, he helps with mechanical and electrical repairs. Linux with the home server. Fishing, hunting, and camping. Wasn't ready this year for steers or chickens but hopefully will next year. Wife is teaching him how to cook, (I'm a decent cook, but she is amazing). Simple sewing. Basic carpentry. And so on.

    School isn't going to teach him much of this, but we will.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago*

    as a kid in middle school I had one, got annoyed enough with it to figure out how to sidload a Linux distro via the command line and just used that (just before Chromebooks had the line thing built in).

    Probably what got me more into the more decentralized focused part of the internet

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›