cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/38464915

top 51 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 92 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Pulling an Elon Musk and insulting your base? Bold move

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The base as it is turned out too small anyways

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I genuinely like their products, but they are dramatically overpriced so we could never made them a regular part of our diet. Now they are on the shit list and they won’t be purchased again until this MAGA nazi is thrown out with a lead parachute.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    He's not insulting anyone. He's describing the current political climate and a failing campaign. Everyone is looking to screech at a CEO rather than read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    And using “wOkE” to describe it, which instantly tells me someone is a childish idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    No. He's literally using the exact phrase and sentiment to describe the challenge of marketing his product to half of The customer base.

    It was apt, succinct, and perfectly describes the challenge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The broader point he's making - that having his brand associated with one side in a polarized political landscape is terrible for profits - is legitimate. The problem is he's saying it using the language of the other side, which isn't helping either.

    From the article:

    A wide range of American companies have sought to distance themselves from behavior that may be perceived as “woke” since US President Donald Trump began his second term, including long-established DEI initiatives, links to LGBTQ+ causes, charities, and events, and environmental pledges.

    I get why companies are doing this, but I also lose all respect for them. These things either represent important ideals or they don't. If you believe they do, and then distance yourself from them, it shows a lack of integrity and moral fortitude. If you don't believe they do, then the fact that you embraced them to begin with means you were simply pandering for profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I agree with your first paragraph, but I've got a different take than your second one. I don't think they're abandoning their ideals, just the way they're presenting their goals. The product still does all the good it has from the start, but the sad reality is that an upsettingly large percent of the population has been brainwashed to see that as an opposition to their way of life. Instead of using messaging that is an immediate turn off to that sector, or making people think they're taking a political stance by supporting something plant based, it seems win/win to find another way to talk about this. The company can be more profitable, which is obviously good for them, but in doing so it means more people are open to consuming something that isn't hurting the planet or their own bodies. I think the point he's trying to make is a good one. This shouldn't be a political issue, but the once apolitical and admittedly niche stance has been tainted by smear campaigns. To make a bigger difference, you need a bigger audience. To get a bigger audience, you need to become appealing beyond your current one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Once he said "The company is too woke," he made it political.

    But I'm not just talking about this company. I don't know if they have any history of supporting diversity, but a lot of companies did and now have walked that talk back in order maintain profits. If I take a stand for something, and then abandon that stand if it impacts me financially, then I'm literally abandoning my ideals. That's what many companies have done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    YOUR ENTIRE BRAND IS APPEALING TO VEGANS WHO ARE DAMN NEAR EXLUSIVELY LEFTISTS AND DEM VOTERS!

  • source
  • it should be illegal to be a ceo

  • source
  • Oh fuck off Pete, stop blaming others for your failure to fulfill your sky high promises you made to your investors as you count your millions in your bank account.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Always fun when the CEO of a company exclusively serving left wing people start cozying up to the right.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    it's almost as if corporate America values fascist ideologies over profits.

    oh wait.....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, no. Those two go together pretty well.

    This is just a guy cozying up to the right hoping for more business or favors while forgetting what his actual customers are. Not the first CEO to be that dumb

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe your product didn't sell well among vegans because you made it with animal testing? Just a thought.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    He brings up a good point in an utterly trash way.

    Most people see “meat replacement” shit like impossible/beyond/morningstar/gardein/etc as “vegan/vegetarian” food. Thus, if they do not identify that way they pass it over.

    Would it be best to convert said people to veganism? Of course. But is that likely a pipe dream? Probably also yes. And given that it is still a net benefit from both an animal welfare and climate perspective for meat eaters to integrate this stuff into their diet as much as possible.

    The unfortunate truth is that veganism and animal welfare has absolutely played into the culture war bullshit and you will be lumped into the “sjw left” for not eating meat. He needs to work on how he delivers this message though because alienating the core demographic will just bankrupt the company (although oh well if so, fuck impossible). But at the same time the ultimate goal needs to be getting as many people as possible eating as little meat as possible. Unless you plan to make harvesting animals for food illegal somehow and if so good luck, I guess

    That said in my experience most vegans don’t eat much impossible anyway. I don’t know how widespread this knowledge is but fwiw even though it is advertised as vegan that is only because it contains no animal products. Impossible utilized a great deal of animal testing that required destruction (read: euthanizing/killing) of the test subjects so that they could fast track FDA approval of soy leghemoglobin (branded as “heme”), the plant based analog for hemoglobin that gives impossible its “meaty” taste (and concerns about long term safety, especially if you eat a lot of it).

    However this is not the only approach - beyond is big on being soy free so they do not use soy leghemoglobin. Instead they achieve the “meaty” flavor with a combination of amino acids, glutamates, and typical flavorings one would expect (smoke flavor, rest is unknown and proprietary. Thank the USA regulatory state for allowing this practice of hiding tons of shit under labels like “natural flavors”).

    Impossible just sucks tbh. The interesting stuff is up and coming. Chunk foods is starting to get national distribution and is a far superior product (though expensive, unfortunately). It’s created through a process of fermentation of soy and wheat gluten. The end result is a product much closer to steak with a meaty flavor that avoids all the binders, preservatives, and flavorings that are in many other options (though you still get things like beet juice for color and coconut oil for fat content)

    Or you know, just eat like, tofu and lentils

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't really see why any carnist would eat a meat replacement that's 1) more expensive and 2) not as versatile and 3) less healthy

    I'm vegan! Impossible is junk food. It's not a sustainable part of anyone's diet, it's a sometimes food for when you're feeling lazy or have a craving. There's basically no value here for carnists, they can just eat meat and have a better experience. Basically the only reason you'd eat Impossible is if you have ethical or political opinions that conflict with meat eating i.e. woke and partisan

    Another CEO that doesn't understand his consumers, his market, his industry, or his purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Impossible is just highly processed food. There are >50 decent vegetarian burger patty recipes that are easy, much cheaper, taste better and are far healthier. Even a Portobello burger is simpler and better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I am an unrepentant meat eater, and I will fuck up a black bean burger on the reg. It's not a hamburger, but also it's not trying to be a hamburger. It's its own thing, and delicious. I love the choice of having either.

    Impossible is just a hamburger. There's literally nothing unique about it outside of its creation, but this is food. Who cares about the journey, the important part is when it hits your mouth (speaking specifically about judging the food as food, the ethics of the journey ofc matter).

    Impossible is a solution in search of a problem, and it misses the mark entirely. Guess that could change should they make it cheaper or healthier than meat, but they don't seemed inclined to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah the sky seems like he's as boring up his own company to make a reason

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago*

    I like impossible/beyond.

    I cook/eat a lot of it, making big cottage pies and the like, as tofu just doesn't taste good for replacing meat in these applications. I'm unfortunately gluten intolerant as well.

    I do worry about the heme a bit, much more interested in beyond when given the choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "The Plant-Based Sector" aka most of agriculture. Rather than worrying about how to target vegans, how to target meat-eaters, and how "woke" you should be, wouldn't a better image to project be one of having the main goal of producing things that are appealing to people who like to eat food?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    And now Impossible is on the boycott list. Godammit.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Sounds like I don't buy that brand anymore

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Wtf.... The entire concept of plant based meat is a woke concept... These motherfuckers should be drug tested weekly and the results posted publicly, if I have to do drug tests to do my job, these cunts should too.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Adults can choose where to work or what to eat. Children require protection. I guess the example doesn't make sense to me.

    I respectfully agree to disagree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I think you're making his point for him. It shouldn't be "a woke concept". Aside from the fact that word woke has practically lost all meaning, the reality is that everybody (outside of the animal farming industry) wins if fewer people are eating meat less often. I agree with his point that they shouldn't be focusing on this as a "meat replacement," especially because that implies it's only appealing to people who avoid eating meat entirely. The goal of converting the entire planet to veganism is a pipe dream. Presenting this not as a complete lifestyle change, but as an additional menu option alongside traditional choices instead of in opposition to them is a much easier path toward incremental change. That stance has potential to reach people across political and carnivorous boundaries and reach the shared goal of climate and global health improvements, while also appealing to capitalist shareholders. It seems win/win.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Beyond meat is better than impossible meat.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Bold move, Cotton...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It's not the marketing.

    It's the food. It's getting closer but it's still more expensive for food that isn't as good.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Whatever, as long as people are eating less meat.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    You mean marketing anything to vegans is fucking impossible?

    gestures to comments

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I don’t get meat alternatives. They’re all fucking gross, like CEOs and people that use the word “WoKe” in a non-satirical way. It’s funny watching him call the sector woke and politicized, when he’s doing literally the same thing by calling it woke. Maybe speak like an adult instead of a 4chan edgelord dumbass.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    you don't say

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/vegan@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    "Nobody wants to eat Climate food"

    Um, I do. It's a major reason I finally made the plunge.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    🙄🙄🙄

  • source
  • [+] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)