U.S. beef prices have been stubbornly high for a variety of reasons, including drought and reduced imports from Mexico due to a flesh-eating pest in cattle herds there.

all 61 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 172 points 1 year ago (9 children)

How does this help American farmers?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 90 points 1 year ago

    Oh shit! I can't believe it took me this long to figure out that MAGA means: Make Argentina Great Again

  • source
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    American rancher? Fuck you!

    Trump fucks his supporters yet again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wow, that picture makes him look even older than the Time cover.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 43 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Lmao. This goes against his tariffs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We gave them 40 billion and then purchase their beef? Feels like a trade deficit

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    They're desperate to save Argentina from collapsing because Argentina voted in their own Authoritarian and Trump, Elon and Theil used it as a test run for what they are trying to do to America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago*

    Rather than breaking up the meatpacking under antitrust (an actual solutiom) we're, uh, importing more beef to bailout rich americans who over-invested in argentina?

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sorry I'm dumb, can someone tell me how it's Trump that decides this? I thought wholesalers and retailers decided where to source meat from, not the federal government?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago*

    Ah, you are thinking logically. This is a mistake when it's got anything to do with the orange rapist.


    What happened is something along the lines of this...
    "Sir. The poors are complaining about beef prices again"
    {Obese orange imbecile flies in to a narcissistic rage, then shits himself}
    "Sir. Why don't we import beef from Argentina?"
    {Shits himself again} "Press conference, now."
    ...
    "I've called you all here today because I myself have had a tremendous, bigly, perfect idea" {performs that stupid fucking grin of his, puts his thumb up, shits himself} "My, and my alone, idea is to import beef from Australgentina to bring prices down. You know my uncle was a cow, the best cow, yuge big udders he had. Everyone said it. Anyways, if prices go down this was all my idea" {Puts thumb up. Stupid grin. Shits his pants again}


    There you go. Basically if he hears something that seems like a good idea, or if he thinks there's a good soundbite from it, then it's now his idea.
    If it fails then it was a federal thing to blame. Or Obama. Or Biden. Or both.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tarrifs really. His favourite toy. When he 'decides to import Argentinian beef', i presume this means he means he will remove or reduce tarrifs on beef from Argentina, and potentially lower or streamline any bureacracratic hurdles - you know silly things like quality and disease control - stuff like that which Republicans hate. That'll thereby make Argentinian beef much cheaper for US wholsalers.

    As usual, this is a disaster of his own making, as he imposed an additional 50% tarrif on Brazilian beef - which was a large source of US supermarket beef, on top of their pre-existing 23.6% tarrif.. Taking it to nearly 75% tarrif, and this was during an (ongoing) parasite outbreak in Mexico that was already lowering beef availability to the US and causing price rises. So, shock.. supermarket beef prices shot up rapidly in response and have stayed there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This whole idea avoids two big issues at stake.

    • The United States dollar is weakening.
    • American Ranchers are in desperate need of help to increase domestic production.

    With the US dollar weakening, this creates economic risks for purchase orders of Argentinian beef. There will need specific policy assurances in place and market controls by both Governments to ensure that a continuing weakening US dollar doesn't commit retailers to beef that does nothing to move price to consumer.

    There would need to be ever increasing tariff controls in place and if Trump does not make the midterms, there is a good chance that Congress could curtail his usurping Article I powers from Congress. This could come at a time that would be critical for quick adjustments and if retailers have put in orders that jump suddenly or orders that just get cancelled.

    Record high retail beef prices in the US in 2025 are driven by low domestic cattle supplies and strong demand. This is due in part to several post pandemic droughts the world over. Additionally, changing trade policy has made steady market planning by US cattle producers that much more difficult. The volatility paired with natural factors has cause beef production within the United States to plunge. Independent farmers of beef are in need and losing the battle to commercial beef production that continue to use their market position to maintain higher beef prices and lower production.

    There needs to be movement on multiple fronts within the United States to ensure a healthy beef production that can match the demand being seen. Simply importing Argentinian beef, slaps a band-aid on a wound that's in critical need of prompt attention. And failure to address the complexities of what's driving beef prices higher and just simply applying a stop-gap issue that does nothing long term, will ensure that beef prices don't actually move anywhere in the foreseeable future.

    If this whole thing was part of some larger domestic improvement plan, that would be a different story. But this President is widely known for half assing, or quarter assing, or concepts of a planning his way through his term. There's no way that there's some larger strategy involved here. And so what the President is doing is attempting to curry favor with Argentina and Milei by putting long term US beef viability at stake (no pun intended).

    I expect nothing less from the guy. This is just a foolish plan that is going to blow up in someone's face a few years down the road. This idiot in the White House is just hoping that he isn't that guy left holding the bag when it does.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If American ranchers are struggling to produce competitive beef, why is that a problem? It's not a critical good; just import it and let the industry shrink.

    If as you say it's domestic producers maintaining the price high by restricting supply, imports will encourage them to increase supply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Also, if the dollar is weakening, that makes US-ranched beef relatively cheaper on world markets (assuming some idiot didn't slap tariffs on beef imports, triggering retaliatory tariffs from back-stabbed trading partners).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    how about he just gets rid of the stupid fucking tariffs that have basically embargoed his own country.

    If only he wasn't putin's bitch.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    The whole point of tariffs is to make the price high so that American farmers can sell their beef while hiring in the American economy... High prices are the whole goal.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    🎶Don't tariff beef, Argentina!

    - Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We spent $40 billion on beef, and we still have to purchase it? That's about $120 worth of beef for each American citizen. I'll take a mix of steaks and ground beef, with a few nice pot roasts tossed in.

    Or they could just spend the money on health care instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    If only Brazilian beef wasn't tariffed due to them prosecuting fascism

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    This is the type of shit a noob does in Victoria 3. Uooueggh line is going down start slapping buttons!!!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Soy bean market given, 40 billion given,, and now we're giving them the American beef market too? Damn, talk about being America first.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So the government will buy it and give out to people for free? Because otherwise I don't see how it will lower prices.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Prices would go down due to an economic principle known as supply and demand

    The basic idea is in a market where the demand for an item (beef in this case) outstrips the supply, the price goes up until the demand is equal to the supply. By importing Argentinian beef, you're increasing the available supply in the market. Thus the price will decrease until supply and demand are again equal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    That would only be true if beef imported from Argentina was cheaper than beef produced in US, right? And if imported beef was cheaper it would already be in US, right? Unless there are some health based restrictions that prevent importing beef and the government is going to remove those?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, it isn't supply and demand. The supply is the same. They aren't producing more beef that didn't exist before last week. You could always buy Argentinian beef in the US, but it wasn't imported more because of the price. So if you want to say that the localized supply increased, then it is because it was purchased by the government and either given away for free or heavily subsidized in price.

    Subsidies is why this will make beef less expensive. Except now the subsidies are going to Argentinians instead of American farmers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    When markets are divided due to local borders, discriminatory quotas or trade regulations, or other non-tariff barriers to entry, it makes no sense to take a global view of supply and demand, since there's no global market, only dozens of balkanized local markets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The US imports 7% of its beef from Brazil, 5% from Australia, 4% from Canada, 3% from New Zealand, 2% from Mexico, and 4% from the rest of the world.

    That's 25% of our beef from the global market... and you are saying there is no global market? Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand aren't exactly close neighbors. Brazil just got slapped with a 50% tariff, so what barriers to entry does Argentina have that Brazil does not?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Jesus they are super fucking desperate to make Argentina work

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mere months after ShittyPants was throwing a fit about Australia not buying that godawful hormone and chemical stuffed American beef.

    What a crybaby.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    When being smart is just too hard.

    That's when you throw on a red hat and start fucking your relatives.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    trump beef™, now with free included prions!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Start investing in building firms around rural America, there's going to be a big old rush on by the land farmers used to own.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Argentina screwworm attack!

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago

    This is fantastic news for vegans! I'm sure all of the "US beef doesn't directly contribute to deforestation - you're overreacting" folks will now see the direct connection and stop eating beef...

    They weren't arguing in bad faith right?..... Right?

  • source