Does this mean we can lay them off?
/s
Does this mean we can lay them off?
/s
On the bright side, at least the bad decisions will stop for a brief period.
Why? It's only closed to the public, not for official business.
Nope, the complete dissolution of the court was always the plan, something like:
The president is the ultimate authority in America.
That's why Barret is on there.
She's from a cult where women are completely subservient, can't speak against any man. And until Handmaids Tale was popular, she was literally called a handmaid.
That's why she said she couldn't enforce any rulings, she doesn't think she has any agency. She was out there by a man and she'll say and do anything that man says too, I clouding telling the public the SC is pointless and can't enforce anything.
The only bright side is the masses might understand that alternating between Nazis and neoliberals keeps the same oligarchs stealing the same wealth from all of us.
They want us fighting about which path is best, when they're two of the worst options.
They're not the only two choices.
Probably won't affect Clarence "no bribe too small" Thomas. His "friends" will take care of his sleazy ass.
Does this mean security for judges stops?
Close the Supreme clownshow. Close the federal government forever, let the Untied States split into 55 independent countries
As much as I would like to not be tied to red states, the fight for federal assets and military assets would bring a lot of bloodshed. Also, most states do have nukes.
You're half right - Russia is in Europe, but that does not mean all Europeans are Russian. But from Europe, the view is good. Could have been better if you didn't elect trump, but still.
Would have*
Life. The world in general. Some little kids. History. All that would have been better if the obese orange sicko was never born.
So true.
About your edit on my wording: does both not work in this context? My mother tongue is Norwegian, so I'd like to know how I can improve my English language.
Could = possibly. Would = definitively.
Yeah, I'm gonna agree with you. Should have used would.
In general your wording is correct. And your English language is far better than I've seen from a lot of the native speakers here in England.
The word could does mean possibly.
The thing is with a person like tRUMP there should be no vagueness or ambiguity.
Seriously, your English is great. I wouldn't have guessed it was your second language.
So they can be bought
Maybe we could all pitch in an RV full of naked woman (consenting adults on the job) to get some of our rights back?
A nobody got an RV full of naked consenting women? Its for a good cause.
Best I can offer is binders full of women.
all 35 comments