I get the message but 2 shows shown there don't fit that bill. Peggy was probably more useless than Al in Married with children. And Phil was actually a decent husband in Modern family. It's right about Everybody loves raymond though. Not sure what she saw in him.
post
Love me some Peggy, but I wouldn't exactly agree that she and Al belong in this image.
I so recall an episode of her just eating chocolates in front of the tv in a scene. They are awful people mean at least Al worked and kept his job to afford a house with two kids (wait sounds like Simpsons). But both are kinda awful which is why it's a sitcom, otherwise it'd be boring and no one would remember the show. Flushes toilet
Guess the house looked kept well too of course so not just her or anything. Yay for TV sets (not the actual tvs I mean)
I loved Kevin Can Fuck Himself for exactly this reason. We get to see the useless husband absolutely fall apart over the course of the show.
SO UNDER RATED!!! I loved that show despite resisting / not getting it when it first came out. It was not very well marketed. But I get it, it is SO subversive and hard to describe in a compelling way. I struggle to convince people to watch it, and when they do they turn it off in like 30 seconds because "it's just another sitcom" NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Keep watching!!!
Watch Kevin Can Go Fuck Himself. Especially if You like Anny Murphy of Shitt's Creek fame.
I mean, you could argue that the "useless husband" trope is just the "nagging wife" trope re-workwd to demonize men instead of women. Both are just as bad.
Sitcoms are bad in general. Turn off the laugh tracks and you'll find they aren't funny at all. The characters have to be designed to be shitty and unreasonable people, because it's incredibly difficult to write a story with characters that make reasonable and empathetic decisions without it being boring. Dumbing people down into tropes makes it cheap and easy to crank out episode after episode after episode.
If you pay attention you'll also notice that these shows tend to only have maybe 100 unique plots, and after that they just repeat. And these shows steal from each other. It's similar to how so many anime's have a "beach episode" or "bathhouse episode".
it's incredibly difficult to write a story with characters that make reasonable and empathetic decisions without it being boring
Nah, not exactly. Yeah ever story needs some conflict or adversity to overcome, but if the characters are healthy and empathetic then the conflict has to be external. But that doesn't work so well for shows that revolve around a small set of insular characters and their at-home relationships. External conflict fits better with adventure stories and crime solving and whatnot.
Dunbing people down into tropes makes it cheap and easy to crank out episode after episode after episode.
Yeah for sure. TVTropes.com has ruined so much of this for me lol (warning if you're not familiar, it's a worse timesink than Wikipedia)
It's also a little scary in retrospect that a lot of the men can be used very clearly to demonstrate what undiagnosed, untreated neurodivergence looks like. Looking at this fucking retard with executive function problems! Isn't he a shithead? He's so lucky that this woman with undiagnosed, untreated neurodivergence manages to mask her way through life and only unload her frustrations on the one person in the world who loves her unconditionally. Let's have an episode where she is unable to contribute to their normally working relationship and watch as his complete lack of support and zero close friends illustrates his utter dependence on structure and routine.
I mean, yes, Hollywood writing for ongoing series is often repetitive. You literally have a "procedural" genre where they go through the same basic structure with almost every episode. Some sitcoms are quite bad. Some are pretty funny (and don't involve laugh tracks). There's a pretty big difference between your average multi-camera sitcom and single camera sitcom. But at the end of the day there's just good shows and bad shows and those don't always correlate with popularity.
The concept of "mental load" blew the cabin doors of my brain wide open. This isn't the comic that did it for me, but it's as decent one about how men are often socialized to be basically useless outside of a few specialized roles: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/26/gender-wars-household-chores-comic
That is a good perspective on a majority of hetero marriages. Key take aways is communication is so important in relationship. My spouse thanks me a lot that I'm not "one of those husbands" and actually when I was putting my son to bed last night he said he's glad I'm his dad and I'll quote "because if I was a lazy dad he'd tell me to get out so he could have a hardworking dad like me." He doesn't see me at work, he meant at home.
I know there are other dads out there that do strike a balance in the home. So we (men) are not all hopeless. But I'm not ignorant to not recognize the vast majority are big children looking for a mommy instead of a wife. In the example of what my son said above, parents need to be examples of what is right. He sees me cooking, cleaning, and doing everything around the house. Also participating in his life and being present for him. That's what matters most.
Anyhow everyone with children should be aware of these issues and do better than their "traditional" parents. Break the cycle. I don't want my kids relying on another person to do basic life functions, that's a very pathetic way to be.
I don’t want my kids relying on another person to do basic life functions, that’s a very pathetic way to be.
Totally, I have a friend who really struggling because her two boys are now becoming teenagers and all they've ever seen is her doing virtually all the work around the house, so naturally they're now resistant to being expected to step it up in the chore department. And it's not like their father can really admonish them, because they're just copying his lead.
I get that it can be a struggle to overcome your upbringing, but you've got to try.
Okay, I’m probably not the target audience here because I don’t watch sitcoms. Here’s the thing I don’t like about the husband’s share of the housework thing. I don’t feel like it’s fair if I share the housework but my spouse doesn’t share the yard work. It’s a partnership, and we need to divide responsibilities. If we don’t, it’s extra on me as the husband. Sometimes, I have the capacity to take that on. Other times, I don’t and I need my spouse to fill in for me.
Now here’s the thing. If we don’t have a yard, I should absolutely divide the housework because it’s otherwise not fair to the spouse.
But, like I was reminded when I got married, marriage isn’t 50/50. Sometimes it’s 40/60. Sometimes it’s 0/100. You put in what you got because it’s a partnership.
"If love does not know how to give and take without restrictions, it is not love, but a transaction that never fails to lay stress on a plus and a minus." -Emma Goldman
It is also very hard to have a realistic estimation of how much work your partner is actually doing, because obviously they are doing it and not you. So it is somewhat obscure to you and their share appears smaller to you. If you want to share work equally you should be prepared to do what you perceive as ~70% of the work load.
On another note: I feel like yard work is a strange example because in most cases work in the garden is a rather voluntary thing. Nothing bad usually happens if a garden is neglected a bit, unless you are relying on it for produce. Granted, things can overgrow, maybe a bush is removed rather sooner than later, but the household is just a huge never ending chain of responsibilities and important garden work is rather sporadic. Household work just needs to be done to ensure there is food on the table and clean clothes in the wardrobe.
Don't put Phil Dumphy in this category. Man does this share of the housework and is generally a good man.
Recently rewatched Dinosaurs (the 90s puppet sitcom). They do an excellent job of pointing this out, especially in the episode "dirty dancing"

Earl immediately points out how TV sucks because they make one hit TV show with a premise and then a 50 more of the same after. Then the whole episode is about Fran (his wife) nagging him to be a good father to their son, and him being useless and lazy dad stereotype.
Great show. So much still relevant.
all 42 comments