top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 123 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    Look I will freely admit there are plenty of better ways to cook salmon... but for a 3 minute meal he's not wrong about this being a far better option than most.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago* (19 children)

    Among the better ways, toast it in the toaster oven. Not a pop-up slice toaster!

    1. Turn on the kitchen vent, open a window, tun on the air purifier, whatever.

    2. Put your salmon fillet skin-side-down on a piece of parchment or aluminum foil on the pan that fits in your toaster oven. No skin? Don't worry, it's fine.

    Here's where you separate a tiny bit for the cat that gets cooked but not seasoned

    1. Sprinkle the top with seasoned salt and dill. Oil is not necessary, salmon has plenty of its own fat. Lemon can wait until you're about to bite into it.

    2. Hit TOAST. If you have to choose a number choose the middle one. Go make your salad.

    3. When it beeps, see if it's perfect or needs another round, maybe on a smaller number. A spatula will lift the cooked fish off its skin onto your plate.

    4. If you like salmon skin, put it in for another toast on its own, but this time watch it, because it's frying itself in there and could burn. If you don't like the skin, toss it out.

    I'm not as concise as Mr. King, that's why he makes the big bucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Not a pop-up slice toaster!

    Now I'm picturing someone jamming salmon filet into a toaster, thanks for that image 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Probably shouldn't use a panini maker either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I did this once as an undergrad when I lived in the dorms. It worked fine for cooking the fish, but that toaster was never the same again. It's really hard to clean the crevices around the crumb tray.

    2/10, would not recommend.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    i'ma turn my toaster sideways and let my oppositional defiant disorder win today

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This is my lazy quesadilla trick. Nuke with cheese in the microwave until cheese melted, fold in half, put in toaster laying on side. Pops out crispy right onto my plate!

    Not as good as when properly made, but quick, no skillet dirty and better than microwaved alone.

    Toaster on side also a quick way to reheat slice of cold pizza!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Film it and put it on YouTube... so we can ALL win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago*

    Totally. For a healthy, quick, easy, tasty meal, this really gets high marks.

    Is it one of the best ways to maximize salmon's flavor? No

    Is it one of the best healthy, quick, easy, tasty meals? Yes

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] [S] 22 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I was waiting for someone to post this. Why anyone thought this was a good idea is beyond me.

    You now have two things with this method:

    1. Trace amounts of dishwasher chemicals in your fish

    2. A dishwasher that smells like fish. A fishwasher if you will

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    If it's a tight package (heh) then neither should happen. And you'd wash your plates and utensils you used to eat the salmon with anyway.

    I'd guess the idea is some sort of multitasking thing, maybe to save energy? Pretty wacky idea nonetheless

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And as usual, the ending sucked.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Yet another out of touch rich guy that thinks we can afford salmon

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Salmon near me is $8 per pound on a good sale (9-10 is more frequent), so a 6 ounce portion is $3ish. A lemon for 80 cents, a bag of frozen mixed vegetables, 2 portions of salmon, and an ounce of butter, and dinner is $10.

    I would add rice, and then probably get a pound and a quarter of salmon to have some to make leftovers into onigiri, then it's lunch the next day too, but the cost goes up.

    It's possible $10 is out of reach, or you live in a much more expensive area. Apologies if either of those applies to you, but this seems to be an approachable option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I usually spend like £25 a week between the 2 of us. I was thinking of trying to catch seafood myself and while I have managed to get a crab before my partner isn't keen on the idea of eating something I caught.

    I thought he went nicely on toast when mixed with some mayo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    American Catholics in 1960: "We eat fish every Friday during Lent to represent the poverty of our forefathers long ago. The ancient peoples who could subsist on nothing else pulled great bounties from the Mediterranean. It sustained civilization in that humble way for centuries and today we remember our simple origins."

    American Catholics in 2020: "Fish for dinner? What are we, made out of money? Have a hamburger instead. No, I will not think for one single second about the sociological or ecological ramifications of this decision."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    At this point its not much more expensive than beef etc. Fish is a more competitive market than the beef processor monopolies, at least in the US

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What the hell is with the culinary advice in this thread, do you people not own stoves?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    The lazy way to cook salmon I know is to wrap it in foil and bake it in the oven for a bit. Wrapping it means that there is no surface browning and I imagine it cooks very similarly to microwaving. It's not like meat or bread where you want to sear the outside, or sauce or soup where a longer cooking time imparts a deeper flavour - raw salmon is tasty after all.

    I haven't tried it, but I also suspect everyone horrified by this also hasn't tried it, and it seems like it would work just fine. Microwaving fish is such a meme at this point that I think there's a short circuit in people's brains where they think it magically ruins food and creates a smell that would not be created by heating it equivalently using some other method.

    So does anyone know for a fact whether this is terrible?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The salmon will be fine, pretty much the same as steam-cooking it. Just put some spices and a lot of lemon so it would not be bland.

    The microwave, on the other hand, will gain a subtle and mysterious fish aroma, that will only become stronger with the passage of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That sounds like a lot of work. And I'm not fan of steamed fish. Salmon is like the easiest fish to pan fry.

    • Heat a tablespoon (this can be a literal spoon from your table, no need for precision here) or two of olive oil to its smoke point on a pan. If it's smoking a lot turn the heat down.
    • Lightly (using course) salt salmon.
    • Add to hot pan. Don't worry if it sticks a little.
    • When the salmon has changed color to right around halfway from the pan to the top of the salmon, flip it over. At this point if the pan is hot enough, even a steel pan should have released the fish. After the flip, watch the color continue to change.
    • When it looks like a fish you want to eat (and the fish stops sticking) remove from the pan and plate. The edges should be a delicious crispy golden color. This is where all the best flavors get together. You don't even need to worry about it being cooked through. I like it a little closer to raw on the inside.

    The whole process takes about 5 minutes plus the time it takes to preheat the pan. I have an induction range, so the pan preheats in the time it takes me to salt the salmon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why do you think one doesn’t need to worry about it being cooked through?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because there isn't much of a risk of food borne illness from bacteria inside the flesh of the fish. The big concern there, especially salmon, is the parasites. That's why salmon is flash frozen on the boat as soon after it's caught as possible, to kill those parasites. That flash freezing is also the only reason salmon is used in modern sushi. Properly handled, salmon is about as (if not less) dangerous than a steak with regards to bacteria. Pretty much any bacteria present will be on the surface, not inside the flesh, so those get killed w once you've cooked the outside. As with anything, the risk of bacteria isn't zero, but it's small enough that most people need not worry about cooked it until it is a dry chewy abomination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Just buy some warm smoked salmon and eat it as it is. Add some of that lemon you mentioned.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Cold smoked salmon > warm smoked salmon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Cold smoked salmon is a completely different thing. Both are good (usually) but the warm smoked is much closer to this microwave thing he is describing (which is still better than dishwasher salmon!).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm gonna have to get scientific here. What are the temperature ranges for each and how long should I smoke a roughly 1 KG fillet using either method?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    For cold smoking the temperature is around room temperature (25 celsius is ideal), and it takes around 6-8 hours.

    There are various hot smoking methods. The first (and best in my opinion) is around 70-80 degrees celsius, and takes about 4-6 hours. Secondly alternatively around 100 degrees celsius for 1-3 hours. Thirdly around 120-130 degrees celsius and 30 minutes. The goal is for the salmon to reach 62 degrees celsius internal temperature. But I find the lower heat is best for salmon, because higher heat creates more albumin when cooking salmon.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    further evidence in support of my policy of not taking cooking advice from people who advocate for putting food on paper towels

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I'm a bad cook. Why should I not do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    my understanding is that most kinds of paper towels are not food safe, and can contain bleaching agents, formaldehyde, and other such things. i’ve yet to find a great drop in replacement for them though. so i’ve just been avoiding/altering recipes that ask for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    altering recipes that ask for them.

    What's your preferred alternative? I'm looking for something that gives me the same great taste and texture but is also 100% organic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    i still haven’t found a great alternative to be honest, but at the moment i just try to see if i can somehow use a strainer/colander to accomplish the same task. but its a bit of a half-measure and doesn’t work in all contexts

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wait what?

    This is like when I learned you're not supposed to microwave food in Tupperware because of micro plastics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Fuck, for a supposedly rich country, the US is full of as many weird traps as a some war rawaged place. You guys have to be on a lookout all the time, eh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    yeah it is extremely frustrating how many traps there are. i think it’s because the US has a culture of thinking things are “safe until proven unsafe” instead of “unsafe until proven safe”.

    learning about the paper towels, microwave popcorn, and silicone cookware made me go nuclear on my kitchen. at this point i only let food touch glass, stainless steel, wood, or ceramic. it’s annoyingly difficult to find non-plastic versions of certain things (e.g. blenders) but after doing it once i don’t have to worry about it again for 5-10 years so it’s not too bad in that context. and i haven’t had to deal with any of the traps since then.

  • source
  • parent
  • Yeah well, that's why we can't get healthcare. Then they could detect our diseases and toxins and we could class action sue. The class action lawsuits alone make corporations shake in their boots enough that they say we "can't afford healthcare for all." We can, but the rich corporations cant

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Wrapping corn in a damp paper towel and throwing it in the microwave for five minutes is so much easier than boiling it in a big pot for 20 minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Corn needs 1m in boiling water. Not 20.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • TBH the best corn on the cob I've had the pleasure to encounter was fire grilled {in husk, resheathed after silk removed}, but the standard I've known for home grown sweetcorn is ~90s in low boiling water. Any longer makes it dull and unnecessarily mushy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    i think it’s even easier to use a microwave and a colander. the colander will also last a whole lot longer than a roll of paper towels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Give it at least 9 minutes on broil in your oven.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›