top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 242 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Really doubling down on that, "he actually is the antichrist" thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They have think-tanks dedicated to coming up with the worst decisions possible, for real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 160 points 1 year ago

    Onion?

    checks community name...

    Sigh...

  • source
  • [–] 101 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The Peace President ✝️

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    He just wants something, anything, as big as Obama's. Crowd sizes popularity deportations Nobel Peace Prize or of course, well you know....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago

    Makes that 'are we the baddies?' a whole lot easier to answer.

  • source
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It's like a 10 year old boy is leading America

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    A 10 year old boy who is also a felon, a rapist, and fucks 10 year old girls, while letting other 10 year old boys dictate policy while he golfs and rapes people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    He's more like a ten year old boy who fucks three-year-old girls who don't yet have the language to say what happened to them...and when they get snitchy, he threatens them with violence to shut them up, often demonstrating on a small animal.

    I think I'm trying to say he's not just a precocious kid with anger issues, but a precocious kid with a cruelty streak and symptoms of physical neurological effects and poses a danger to himself and others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    As in precocious puberty. Kids who are sexually activated (by premature hormone reactions which can be triggered -- not always -- by sexual abuse) so they get sexually interested before their peers, and ruin recess for everyone else.

    When I was growing up (mind you, I was a late, late bloomer) precocious puberty in girls was punished brutally (say being grounded for life). Precocious puberty in boys was rewarded with early sports careers, unless you sucked, in which case you were punished for being a sex pest. This was a source of bullies that preyed on the rest of us.

    This is to say, the US really doesn't know how to parent or teach or otherwise administrate children. This is also to say I am way, way bitter about it.

    ETA This is one of the purposes of puberty blockers, when it's not used to let questioning trans kids decide to deliberate on what they want to be for a while, so I hope things are generally better. But then, considering how puberty blockers are now politicized, precocious puberty is also politicized, which ruins everyone's Sunday brunch.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And this fucker wants a Nobel Peace Prize? smh.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    He wants a Nobel because Obama got one. Could it be any more obvious?!

    Trump hates Obama's guts, and Obama drove him to run for the Presidency. Don't believe me? That single roast changed world history. I mean that. That video will be studied 300 years from now as a lever that changed the Western world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago

    I'm so glad President Trump is focused on the important issues, like renaming bodies of water, mountains, schools, and federal institutions. I didn't need lower grocery prices anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    WAR IS PEACE

    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Time is money, money is power, power is pizza, and pizza is knowledge, let's go!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago
    [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I mean, that's what it used to be called...

    more fitting tbh.

    1000001918

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Kind of. The Department of War was the Army only. The Department of Navy was its own department and operated based on a different set of military demands, which was a major reason why the Marines exist.

    It wasn't until after World War II when the USA recognized the difficulty in having two separate departments for the military made combined operations hard to implement. You also had the Army maintaining a larger peacetime size and a third branch, the Air Force, being created to optimize for a new theater of war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 88 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    Lmfao finally something I'm glad he's doing!

    The name change was fucking psychological manipulation for the population. You can't argue against defense department spending as easily as you can argue against war department spending.

    Bring it on! Make our jobs easier you bumbling brainrotted doughnut dictator.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    To make a slight counter, the Defense Department does more than fight. We have humanitarian mission capabilities, and we use it. When shit goes down, you want the military to roll in.

    I've told the story many times, but after Hurricane Ivan I assumed I was on my own. When the Florida Guard rolled in the next morning I was weeping in the streets, on my knees, thank god, thank god. I had no idea there would be any aid. Most humbling. Tearing up now in fact.

    I also wept, most literally, when the Mississippi Guard rolled in after Katrina. My FIL was there. Two bronze stars from Iraq, the Mississippi coast broke him, PTSD. He was never the same man after cutting houses in half with chainsaws, pushing corpses aside, leading the tip of the spear.

    “People sleep peaceably in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”

    Whoever said it, or didn't, we need such men.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    alternatively, instead of having the military have these capabilities perhaps fund non-military departments to do it

    it’s a function of the US military being bloated that they can use some of that bloat to do other things, but it’s far from efficient

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    This isn't necessarily bloat, it's things the military needs to be able to do. Like 90% of the military is just good logistics and the ability to move resources anywhere in the world quickly. That's good for both an army on the move and helping hurricane victims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Logistics is effectively the hardest problem and the most expensive one.

    A lot of people don't realize that a lot of wasteful spending is effectively required in order to maintain any semblance or level of readiness.

    If you are not manufacturing equipment, ammunition, and similar items then you have no one and nowhere to actually manufacture them. A large part of spending is keeping the people, skill sets, facilities, and supply chains running and operating at a minimum required level to support an increase in need. If you don't do this then when you need it, you can't manufacture it anymore, your entire supply chain has to start from scratch.

    It's incredibly wasteful but also somewhat necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Like 90% of the military is just good logistics and the ability to move resources anywhere in the world quickly.

    There’s an old WW2 story, where a captured Nazi officer realized they were going to lose the war… Because he overheard American officers complaining that they were running low on ice cream. Nazis at the time were eating their own boot leather while they froze to death in Russia. Meanwhile, the Americans were complaining about a lack of ice cream.

    The logistics behind the American military is honestly a modern wonder. If they were willing to divert the time, manpower, and resources to do so, they could erect a fully staffed and stocked McDonalds anywhere on the globe in less than 48 hours. Imagine an entire restaurant being built in a single weekend. Now imagine it in the middle of the ocean on an oil rig, or at the North Pole. The sheer amount of resources and manpower required would be monumental by most standards, but it wouldn’t even be worth a footnote on the military’s expense report.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Such a scheme sounds better, but the discipline and infrastructure to make it happen?

    We're not talking social workers replacing cops, we're talking hard motherfuckers doing what it takes, under orders, no failure.

    Anyway, if you ever live the other side of a true disaster, you might see what I mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Came here to say this. It's exactly when it became the department of defense that we had never ending war.

    Though I'd still like it to be named the department of defense and then actually do defense. Unless there is a threat of an American being attacked on domestic ground by a foreign power, this isn't really the intended purpose of the military under our constitution.

    We should not "defend" our "interests abroad." We shouldn't have interests abroad. That's also one of the founding ideas of this country. "Defend our interest abroad" is an intentionally vague euphemism for "if we didn't use a euphemism and just told you in plain words what we're doing you wouldn't like it because what we are doing is killing people to protect the profits of a very tiny number of people whose company would lose profit if we didn't." If that's not what that euphemism means they wouldn't need a euphemism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Unless there is a threat of an American being attacked on domestic ground by a foreign power, this isn’t really the intended purpose of the military under our constitution.

    Back in the 1700s, a standing military wasn't as necessary, since response times were generally measurable in months, and you could stand up an army in that time. Even then, you needed a navy, since shipbuilding took lots of money and time. But now, to prevent an attack on the civilian population or the government, readiness needs to be much, much higher.

    I'm more in agreement with you about "interests abroad." There's far too much interference in the affairs of foreign countries in order to benefit US-based corporations and the ambitions of certain factions of the US elite. But that's a two-way street. For example, Trump is sabotaging renewable energy projects so that the US will continue to be dependent on fossil fuels, since that makes us more vulnerable to manipuation of that market by Russia and other suppliers. Eliminating that massive supply-chain risk should be one of the main pillars of our medium-term national security strategy, and would keep us from being drawn into wars.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Anything to avoid Epstein

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Missed the chance to have a Ministry of Peace.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago*

    They missed a great chance to pull directly out of 1984 and call it the Ministry of Peace.

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    If we're honest, this new name more accurately describes the American military than the word defense does

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It actually used to be called "Department of War". It changed in 1947, which was actually right around the time when the United States went full worldwide imperialism (though there were signs well before then).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    Might as well have been named the "Department of Fighting Communist Insurgencies". Truman and Eisenhower unleashed wave after wave of US troops on any pre-ww colonial territory that was trying to throw off the yoke of European occupation.

    With Global Communism finally crushed, and ethno-nationalist tin pot plutocrats once again in control of Europe and the Middle East, the US can return to its more McKinley-esque tradition of occupation, enslavement, and extraction. No need to pretend we're shielding anyone from the villainous Soviet Marxists or the vile and malignant IWW.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Department of Distraction from Child Rape Allegations.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Release the Epstein files you pedo fucks

  • source
  • [–] 120 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Might as well. It was originally called that, and the DoD name was always kind of a lame coat of off-white landlord paint.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Yeah but it's the death of a euphemism. It was good that they had to use a euphemism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I'll bite. How is that?

    Edit: I watched the death of a euphemism video and understand your point now. My original comment was less of a serious assertion and more voicing my general disdain for the idea of crossing out "War," writing "Defense," and continuing to invade countries for decades anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Euphemisms at least indicate shame.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean, being ashamed of your evil deeds while still doing them doesn’t make it better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well, Dept. of War and Dept. of The Navy became DoD. I used to work for them, some people think I'm a Veteran because I use the block print and the 24h time and today is 25Aug25. I'm not, never been shot at but that shit just gets ingrained in you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hey hey look over here! Stop focusing on how Trump paid for trafficking children for sex. Hey hey look over here!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I mean seriously, things are so bad that's the least worrying part. It's not like his base won't be easily convinced not to care, between his prostitutes, the Russian peepee scandal, "touch them by the pussy", what he did with his beauty pageants, what he has done with Ghislaine Maxwell, what he has said about his own daughter. His base just does not care, all the grandstanding was all fake.

    He is still going strong with his plans regarding Greenland and Canada, and what he has done with Venezuela is foreboding because it normalizes doing it more and with further steps. The steps he is taking to make the US fascist are far worrying, there's no shortage of dictators who are completely and utterly detestable yet nothing can be done because they rule in a fascist country. You need to be able to prosecute him to make him having trafficked children for sex matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    I mean, that's definitely a more honest name, how much of what they do is actually "defense" vs just imperialism

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago

    To be fair, that is a more accurate name for it.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Sounds expensive. How much does it normally cost to rebrand an organisation of this size?

    (and that's without needing to rewrite references to it in any legislation!)

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    • Rebrands of Department of War: Navy, War → Navy, Army, Air Force → Defense → War
    • Rebrands of HBO Max: HBO on Broadband → HBO Go, HBO Now → HBO Max → Max → HBO Max
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    And here I thought that MAGA voted for peace... /s

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This is so sad

    Also, I think the entire world may need to prepare themselves for invasion.

    I seriously hope that Europe and Canada are preparing because this shit stain will start playing the land grab game soon

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The United State military, though the strongest on Earth, cannot compete with the combined forces of Canada and Europe. OTOH, the rest of the "free" world doesn't seem to be taking us seriously enough.

    OTOOH, us American's aren't willing to go full war against our friends, and it takes hella more to drive our war machine than Trump has charisma. Civilians drive that machine, can't do without them, think on that. We're not 1930s Germany, starving under hyperinflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    us American’s aren’t willing to go full war against our friends,

    You'd need a jarhead rebellion for that not to happen.
    Very unlikely, considering they join, willingly, the most belligerent military on the planet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Jesus I need to get the fuck out of this country

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    please sabotage some shit before you leave

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well at least it isnt dogwhistled any longer :/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    29 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post