Dilettante is the word you want here, I think.
post
I actually like that the right word is as basic as poser.
They'd like to have a special name, but they're literally just a bog-standard poser.
Bombastic? Pretentious? Braggart?
I think pretentious is the closest match but it's still lacking something else. Another commenter suggested two words instead of one, I guess that might be the way to go
OP's hypothetical person is explicitly assertive. Pretentious doesn't convey assertion. You can be pretentious internally and keep it to yourself.
I think it is what in Spain we call an "enterao", but I could be wrong.
I'm not sure how to translate it, maybe as "a heard about", a guy that always has heard about whatever and thinks his info is much better or knows a better way to do anything.
Or a "fantasma/casper"
The type that usually likes to talk all the time about any subject, because everything has to be about them? That spews the biggest nonsense with great confidence? I usually call them "manager material" or "walking Dunning-Krüger".
The word is arrogant:-
'having or revealing an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities.'
An arrogant hypocrite who's not nearly as clever as they think they are? A silly man pretending to be otherwise? Me?!
a know-it-all maybe, which I guess is three words, but the lil stripes inbetween are masking it
I guess poser is the closest but it's like an intellectual type of poser. I was hoping for something a bit harsher than just poser though.
It's alright, they may be neurodivergent as I am as well, and everyone has a story and a reason to be and do etc. I'm aware this isn't all there is to this person, I'm not trying to find two words to sum up their existence, just the part of their existence that rubs me off the wrong way.
Braggart
If you've got a black cat, they've got a blacker cat?
If you've been to Tenerife they've been to Elevenerife?
I call that "one-up-manship"
I'd probably call them lost or insecure.
Most people with behaviors like that do it as a defense mechanism.
Intellectual snob.
Pseudo intellectual. Pseudo polymath. Pseudo erudite...
A confident, average, but nonetheless well-rounded individual with broad interests?
Seems like the word you're looking for is 'normal'.
Unless there's some other quality you're not describing like if they're unable to admit when they're wrong or they lie or exaggerate their skills, they seem like a pretty nice person to me who just for whatever reason doesn't specialize in any one thing, which tbf is far more normal for people than otherwise and frankly far more sociable.
You seem a bit jealous of and upset at this person judging by your other comments ITT. What do you have against them, other than them 'liking to pose as an intellectual' - which I assume just stands for "they like facts"?
I think the point you might be missing from the OP, is that the person in question doesn't actually possess this knowledge or skill, but instead of being humble and admitting the gaps in their knowledge, perhaps asking a question or two when they don't understand, they just plow ahead.
I know people like this. It's not malicious I don't think, maybe it's more of a defense mechanism? They don't want to look uninformed, so they try to fill the gaps in their knowledge with assumptions. Maybe they're right a decent amount of the time, or close enough to fool people who aren't knowledgeable on the subject. But people who are knowledgeable, will recognize what they're doing, and the lack of humility comes across as arrogance, even though that may not strictly be the case.
It's normal to know a lot of stuff and like a wide variety of things. But you need to be humble when you don't know something.
When I don't know something for sure, I like to say "I think it's this way, but I could be wrong." Or something like that. Or heck, if someone else has the knowledge and skills I don't, I'm right up there asking questions, I want to learn. Maybe I'll try to impress them with what little I do know on the subject by commenting or asking questions in a way that shows I understand what they're talking about, because we all want to have self worth. But faking it isn't cool, and can be harmful, or just annoying.
Superlicious maybe. Dunning-Kruger in an empty suit.
all 58 comments