all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 1 year ago (19 children)

They are trying, just give them a bit more time and money and money and money and money.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    A little more time and a lot more money. But the savings will be huge. The savings will make the current era of extravagant burning piles of money look like a sound investment. You'll be glad you got in on the ground floor...

    We do need a little more time, though. And money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Also, water. We’ll take all of that please, just pipe it right over to our spot in the desert. We’ll need some more money with that, of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -30 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you want me to list the myriad ways that I want humanity to use less water, I can. This just happens to be top of the list because it has no fucking value at all and is expected to use even more than the others.

    I’m not really sure what you’re trying to say here, other than you use chatgpt and want to stan for it. Ask it to compare the water use to human counterparts, whatever you mean by that. Or really, don’t because the water that would waste is certainly not worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ah, just kill half the humans. That will make water consumption go way down. Follow me for more resource-saving tips

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Turning off AI data centers will instantly save water and energy and reduce pollution.

    But the "human counterparts" will still eat and shower if you fire them.

    So unless you are planning to murder all the unemployed people, your argument makes no sense at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Here ya go: in US someone has the audacity to ask people to use less water so that AI can function. Yet the whole city has been growing in population just fine for quite some time. A mystery, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago

    I'm pleased to report that all those other promised utopia frameworks turned out perfect, and aren't in any way still a huge daily pain in the ass. I expect no less from this time around. Computers are finally smart. It's great.

    It's the AI that is prone to delusions, or was that just me?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    imagine AI replacing investors and CEOs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -32 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    God, I'm so sick of coding. Please. Bring it.

    As of right now though? 5-6 years fie the basics

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    Please exit the job market and let people who want to code make money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is another fine example of where assumptions get you no where on the internet. My job isn't coding but it requires knowing to do it well. If I exit the job market, as per your request, I cannot be replaced by a coder. Believe it or not, most jobs that require a coding skillset are not about coding. Crazy, right? 😲

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "assumptions"? Maybe consider how "I'm so sick of coding" implies you're doing coding? I'm so sick of driving, oh no somebody 'assumed' I'm a driver instead of a mechanic. Believe it or not, most people 'assume' something when you use sentences that imply it. CrAZy, riGhT? 😲

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    ...why would a professional whatever make a remark for technology doing their job for them and making their career redundant?

    Farmer, coder, driver, whatever. "I can't wait for the bots to do this" is not a common muttering. Except maybe if in the c-suite...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    They said they are doing some coding at their non-coding job. It would be good if AI could replace amateur programmers, it would make better code and take a load off the workers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Not in the first comment, and I replayed to the second one only because they were acting like a stereotypical obnoxious redditor. As for LMM use, sure it could replace them, just give it a little more time and more money and a bit more money and some more money and also enough data server centres to suck dry entire lakes

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I'm not a coder, but my job requires a bunch of menial, boring coding. I do numerical simulations. After mathematically understanding the numerical method, it's basically half a step above data entry. There's also a bunch of legacy fortran code I have to build on that has zero documentation and three letter variables. This would be one of the few actually good applications of text generating machine learning imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Or your employer would invest some money in a proper tool for your job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    Nobody has built a tool that executes a mathematical method that I have developed or at least adapted, at least not before I publish the method.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    So why haven’t you published the method?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Because I'm in academia and it's a slow process to get things published in a way that 'counts' to the university and scientific community. I often need to implement stuff first to check a few things, whether it's viable etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That’s not how it works. Put it on GitHub like the rest of us and stop making excuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'm sorry to tell you this but people do not, in fact, publish mathematical proofs on GitHub routinely. You publish them on arxive once the paper is done. And then in a journal. The solvers themselves aren't even what it's about at all, they're just to do numerical experiments with to have some examples. They aren't immediately useful for any applications outside niche research.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    You’re right that mathematical proofs are usually published on arXiv and then in journals. But since you mentioned code: sharing code on GitHub is actually very normal in research. Even if it’s just a solver or scripts for experiments, putting it on GitHub helps with reproducibility, gives others a chance to learn from or build on your work, and makes it easy to cite. There’s no obligation to polish it perfectly—lots of research repos are just “as is” snapshots to support a paper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    To be very honest, I'm also a tad embarrassed to share my code. I guess I'll ask my professor about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Now, that is completely understandable. This is also a reason I don’t publish most of my things. They work, they work well, but… Some of it is kind of nasty. However, other developers are going to understand. Just mention this in the read me file. Or better yet, use this as an opportunity to refactor code. An LLM could be very helpful For that process.

    If you are not familiar with the process of using git or GitHub, i’m sure many of us, including myself, would be more than happy to help you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If it has three letter variables, chances are it was also written by someone that doesn't want to code either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments