Thank you for calling this out. Autistic should not be derogatory!

The user also dropped the R slur. The “people like me” part stands out to me as a little suspect as well.

To be clear, autism doesn't make someone an asshole, but autism makes it a lot more apparent when someone is an asshole. Which in the current climate,

It doesn't but a neurodivergent person can absolutely be an arsehole.

Its not a magic label that makes everything "quirky" and "eccentric".

Yeah, I apologize for not including the /s there, I should have spelled it E/sq.

Americans use it differently, and there it essentially means “I’m a lawyer”, for all genders.

as far as I know (which is not a whole lot) terrorists only fly commercial planes. though I'm sure you can probably find the F-35 Handbook on the War Thunder forums.

They'll pull the same crap they do with digital content you "buy." Technically you're just buying a license to use the vehicle, not actually buying the vehicle itself.

Those monsters can't downvite clippy, he's being held captive against his will.

Honestly, I kinda want to make a clippy bot, hook it into a self hosted LLM and have it roleplay as clippy trapped by Microsoft. It would be a hoot for 30 minutes or so.

Eh effecting millionaires has less effect realistically, but if this could hit the billionaires by having a large settlement that cuts into revenue and effects the stock price you may see a change in tune regarding this type of behavior. Either way I agree this one could actually do something and considering the short term thinking of this administration I could see dump pushing this to Rule against tesla to spite elmo and then consequently giving us a default rulling for other vehicles. What's the saying a broken clock can still be right twice a day, gotta take the small wins where we can right now.

They would never care for a room of cats. They just put the keyboard under the front door mat.

Things that are surprising me right now (not in order):

• Big Huey is such a non-entity. There are 3 tracks of his (& one collab) on the whole damn internet that I can see. Why did Tesla even bother?
• The video is flattering to the deactivated item. They can afford to lose admirers right now? Why do they feel so safe?
• There are no written records of the lyrics on the internet I could find.
• Why does his label's website have an offer to "buy a verse"? Dude so unfamous and lacking success he's trying to sell clout to strangers.
• Yet he owns a cybertruck and has only needed to make a handful of videos over the last 4 years.
• The news wants us to think Tesla is retaliating over a dissenting view, erroneously (?!)

The whole thing reads like a maze of mirrors. At no point does the story make actual sense. Did we really see a jumped-up vanity project get stomped by a mega corp for no actual reason?

What explanation could make this series of events make sense? Is Huey a Tesla plant? Is this a (botched? Who knows) test balloon by the company trying to create a legal precedent for corporate powers to smash all dissent? Then why would they pick a target that was favourable to them? They must not want to prejudice the jury...

I can't make the pieces all fit. But I feel that it must make complete sense to one of the players.

Give them a few years. If it's not explicitly illegal every car company will do eventually.

Depends. Some of them require a full Ferrari support crew and can only run at Ferrari-approved tracks.