doubtful since a case would be in texas with the judge who owns tesla shares

The fascist dictator at the helm remotely bricking customers $100k private vehicles will surely improve the brands image and sales performance!

He should make another song where he tells the story, bashes the company and Elon, and showcase the truck being destroyed to bits!

Your wish would destroy the printers market

"Alright Sparky, if you burn the toast again, it's off to metal recycling for you!"

The clankers won’t spare you when the AI extermination starts.

Rude? No, no no, that's a misunderstand. It's call percussion maintenance SLAP

And everyone is just like "that's totally something they would do! Lol".... What?

Keep in mind pretty much everyone on this platform already hates Tesla and does not nor would they own a Tesla vehicle. There's also a certain 'you got what you deserve by buying that' kind of attitude towards Tesla owners.

This is behaviour we expect from this shit company and it doesn't directly effect any of us commenting on it. We just get to point and laugh (for now).

The discussion might be a little different if it was a less expected brand like IKD, Audi. But who's to say for sure; there's been a lot of 'cattle' behaviour lately.

Google it and you'll see tons of websites telling this was faked.

E.g. that it's highly illegal to stop a car on the road, contradictory information on tesla display (failed update and cease and desist, don't go together. Also return to dealer while being disabled?), addressed name in letter is not the real name, hyphen in wrong place, etc. And tesla (obviously) claimed it's false.

I'm not saying this is proof but saying there are a lot of red flags. Any update from him? Not that I could find. A stunt perhaps to gain publicity?

The song is basically hyping how he's so rich he's got a Cybertruck.

I’m not going to listen to it but apparently it isn’t a dis track, it is a load of wank about how rich he is that he can afford a Cybertruck.

Apparently the author also declined to listen to it, but they are a Journalist; it is their job to listen to it.

It was praising the cyberfuck

If it was just plain old trademark/copyright law, you'd be right.

It sounds like Tesla are basically saying that you signed an NDA/non-disparagement clause when you bought the vehicle, and therefore it's a contract dispute.

Doh.

huh?

its most likely a lawyer on retainer