top 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

does this also affect OP12R? i have battery saver on, so its preventing the updating from constantly bugging me.

  • source
  • [–] 210 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    The worst thing is the past few years android updates brought fuckall exciting new stuff and just more spyware and worse performance .

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] 84 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I returned my Samsung phone over that button. Haven't touched their shit since.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fuck that button. At least let me map it to something else!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can. They did an update to the S8 (and others, I assume) that let you remap it. I used some app before that, something from the Google Play Store but it's been way too long to remember the name. Nowadays there isn't a Bixby button anymore for us to remap. They tried to take over the power button with AI now, but thankfully you can remap this back to power as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    My recent (unwanted) update changed the lock screen to this weird format where the two-digit hour is above the two-digit minute instead of next to it separated by a colon like normal people use. I keep setting it back to what I want but this weird over/under format keeps coming back. Some fucking douchebag of a UX/UI designer thought this was a genius new way of showing the time and now it's being jammed down my throat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I always keep at least one notification so I don't have to see that stupid format on my lock screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I was using stock pixel launcher forever until the most recent "update" that added yet another button to the search bar that you can't remove, that I used daily, and the button went conveniently right where my right thumb tapped. Switched to Lawnchair, and it's not without issue. Why can't shit that has worked just continue to work the same way?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I also swapped to Lawnchair not that long ago. The only thing I miss so far is the ability to use app shortcuts on the home screen. Like opening YouTube directly to my subscriptions, etc. It also uses black text for the status bar on the home screen making it invisible but that might be user error.

    Edit: There's a setting for "Dark Status Bar." I don't know if it was on by default or if I switched it. But now I can see it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 186 points 1 year ago* (24 children)

    I routinely get a Samsung notification telling me to agree to some new agreement thing. I swipe it away. It just reappears in 48 hours or so. I swipe it away. We've danced this dance for years.

    I don't know what it's for, I don't care, and things are just fine as is. There's nothing it it for me so, no.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Please click here to agree to our new Samsung privacy policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm sure that they would choose to interpret the swipe to clear it as a click

    but yeah my last phone I did that for several years. nope, no thank you.

    every time I start my TV I have to say I don't want the new firmware because it comes with a new privacy policy / user agreement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I will need to buy a new TV soon, and the single biggest factor won't be price, features, or quality, it will be the absolute minimum smart features available. I'm fine with a sleep timer, and built-in audio smoothing would be great, but I can add anything else I want with a dongle that costs less than $100 (or just attach a full-blown computer to it). I'm not made of money, but I'm fortunate enough that I can afford to buy a TV with something other than an opportunity to invade my private life for marketing.

    The other thing I'm looking for is a decent non-Google/Apple smartphone with an eye to privacy. A decent Linux phone would be great, Sailfish OS looks promising, maybe there are other options. Hopefully my Samsung lasts until then. When one of their updates came out whose main feature seemed to be the ability to spy on you everywhere, I closed my account and don't even have that logged in anymore. There are a number of interesting features I can't use, and a lot of terrible features I don't want, that aren't available to me anymore. A smartphone that belongs to me, and not some corporate conglomerate would be nice. We'll see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    Sailfish isn't bad but its a compromise. I don't like that it's not open source. I'm happy to pay for it, but I'd prefer if it were a community project rather than something buiut behind the closed doors of an understaffed company.

    That said I'm using it to type this comment so I must still think its better than the alternatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Same with WhatsApp for me, there are new terms and conditions that allow engagement with businesses and sharing some personal data with them, I've been rejecting that shit for four years now, they still keep asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I do the same. I'm close to just delete my samsung account because I don't really need and/or use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    True. I genuinely don't use i either.

    Then again, I'm rolling an S20 Ultra+ that just does everything excellently still. If I want to extend its life as long as possible, I should just load on another OS and solve the Samsung issue that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    I use an app specifically designed to automatically dismiss notifications and I use it to dismiss this Samsung one you mentioned and the voice mail notification, which for some ridiculous reason can't be disabled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I use Macrodroid for similar notification handling shenanigans. I even bought it bc it's so beautifully customisable 👌

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The owner of Macrodroid has started cramming third party trackers into the app to cash out on it. When I started using the app a few years back, the Exodus privacy report for the app counted 2 trackers on the app, one for ads for the free version and one for crash reporting. Now it counts 30 of them, almost all analytics and telemetry. This is an insanely high number. Considering the amount of access and permissions Macrodroid needs to function, this is terrifying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    At some point it annoys me so much I just hit accept. It's probably nothing anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We're getting close to the point where "running a stock ROM" is on the same level of inadvisable as "using a web browser without ad blocking". The latter of which was, btw, also not that big if a deal like ten or fifteen years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    It was sort of a big deal. The forbes malware injection attack by ads was ten years ago. It still ranks as one of the most hilarious 'poetic irony' bits in computer security. I'm sure ads were doing other insidious shit in 2010 that just went unnoticed because it didn't hit security researchers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Praying for some stronger ROM support for foldables. As soon as ATT lets my phone go free (2 year contract) installing one would be the first thing I do, except my phone is a Razr Ultra 2025 and I can't even find much for the Z flip let alone the razrs.

    For now though mullvad stays on with dns blocking and I just keep to Fdroid and Aurora store if needed, not sure what else I can do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    "If we let you control your phones you'll just mess them up!"

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    wasn't there also some concern about messing up the radio communication for a lot of users?

    the idea was that you actually can't mess with radio communications. if you send too much data, it kinda clogs the airspace of radio frequencies and that' actually illegal to do in many countries. rooting the android phone lets you access the radio antenna directly, and you can't let playful nerds mess up the city's mobile internet for a million inhabitants every other day. especially since the source of interference would be hard to track down.

    Now i wonder what that would mean for mobile internet usb peripherals that you can plug into linux laptop and desktop machines. how do they solve this issue?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Rooting the phone means playful nerds could potentially mess up radio frequencies, but they can already do that because they can build radios using readily available electronic components. We already have all kinds of regulations about radio use, and we go after people who actually cause problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    Which is our right. I paid for the phone. Google, Samsung, and Apple aren’t fucking paying me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    Which is our right. I paid for the phone. Google, Samsung, and Apple aren’t fucking paying me.

    There, I fixed it. It's time for a new FOSS phone OS to take over. GrapheneOS looks nice, but it only runs on select Google pixel devices. Maybe if phone manufacturers were forced to let the user chose their OS?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    I would love to get GrapheneOS or some other similar OS but the lack of mobile tap-to-pay support just kills the idea for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I have this little offline only single purpose device that handles tap to pay for me. It is actually waterproof, survives falls, is light enough to not be noticed, and hasn't run out of battery in a few years.

    Jokes aside, what is wrong with good old plastic cards? If you don't want an extra wallet (which I need anyway to carry ids, drivers license, cash, emergency ear plugs, a handy sticker or two...), just get a phone case with card/cash slot thingies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As it is right now, my cell phone replaces a collection of about six plastic cards. I have not yet found a wieldy phone case that has space to store payment cards.

    Realistically, this question could also be asked with cash. If you're going to be pulling out a wallet-like item anyway, and you are that concerned with privacy, why not go with anonymous, fee-free, secure, actually offline paper money? Card processing is not offline. The card machine has to be connected to the Internet for it to work (offline card processing theoretically exists, but is not widely implemented enough to rely on and is not particularly secure).

    If people are going to argue that wanting to pay with a cell phone instead of a plastic card makes me lazy because the card takes a few extra seconds to use compare to the phone, I'm going to argue in turn that they're lazy for using a card when using cash, with all of its privacy benefits, also only takes a few seconds more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    How can you spend time thinking about phones, when there are children starving to death in Africa! See, I am can do that too.

    Besides, I do carry cash for everyday expenses, and I do prefer cash. I don't know where you got that idea from.

    But the question was to replace tap-to-pay. Sadly, tapping people with a fiver makes them irritated at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I've got nothing against you. I'm just not willing to accept a lecture (from other people, not you) about being "lazy" for wanting tap-to-pay on my cell phone. My statement is that the convenience of tap-to-pay for payment cards and transit passes is not worth the otherwise marginal privacy benefit of switching to Graphene.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I understood that, and I disagree with that statement either.

    A plastic card has no wifi, mobile radio, gps, cameras or microphone. The only data it can give away is "john smith paid here for porn and liquor at 4:20". A phone has all of the above, and uses them to collect data about you, which is then used against you. Graphene, by not running all the vendor-specific, preinstalled garbage in the background, is a lot better in that regard than any smartphone you can buy at the store.

    So, in my opinion, it is worth to give up the small convenience of tap-to-pay with a phone and use tap-to-pay with a card. Yes, cash would be even better, but better is the enemy of good. Paying with Monero in a dark alley while wearing a ski mask is even better than that, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I’d love to own my own devices but I’m so addicted to my phone I can’t handle pulling out my lighter, smaller, always charged debit card and so will continue to give up my ownership rights so I can continue to be mildly inconvenienced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago*

    I'd love to stay private, but I'm so addicted to giving my financial information to banks that I can't handle pulling out a lighter, fee-free, no-Internet-access-required, and nearly universally-accepted banknote from my wallet and so will continue to give up data about my spending so I can continue to be mildly inconvenienced.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Debit card? You let your bank know where you're spending money??? Cash only for privacy (I don't actually follow this, I like credit cards and their rewards points, unless it's actually cheaper to use cash)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you own a smartwatch that supports tap to pay, you can use that instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I don't wear a watch at all. I view smart watches in particular as completely useless gadgets. What useful thing do they do that a cell phone doesn't? Count your heart rate? Sell that info to advertisers so they know what time you stay up at night doom-scrolling? They have absolutely no utility for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I was looking at that too and came to the same conclusion. I should probably migrate off apple at some point but Android in its current state is not viable for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    What about it isn't viable? Genuinely curious

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I can’t use it stock because cell providers can push bullshit apps I don’t want without my permission and I can’t fully disable Gemini. Switching to grapheneOS addresses those concerns, but cause new problems, like killing tap to pay and triggering security flags on games and banking apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah that's a fair point. Some android models do have minimal or none bloatware, like Google pixel... But also then papa Google owns your ass lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I was actually looking at moving to a pixel fold but the Gemini shit that I can’t turn off turned me away. The Samsung fold7 is incredibly tempting too, but again, I refuse to use their adware riddled shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Honestly having used a pixel 6 for the last few years, I've never seen or noticed the Gemini stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    We really do need more viable open phone options. We are well past the point in hardware capability that we could have a linux phone that turns into a desktop when you plug it into a docking station. USB-c connections handle everything for my work laptop.

    I have reverted back to using my Linux PC for most screwing around online. My phone, for the technological wonder that it is, is for communicating with family, listening to music, GPSing, and then occasionally computer stuff, looking things up, etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Graphene OS is a privacy focused OS that runs on Pixel phones.

    Its not as seamless as native Google Android but it's still production worthy and works well enough for me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’m definitely glad it and others like it exist. But for phones isn’t the issue more with low-level hardware and firmware? I bet we really need Google to make “Pixel” an open platform and not just a device, so that we can have the “IBM compatible” of phones. But I trust the Google of today to do the opposite.

    Maybe RISC-V is what I’m waiting for? An open phone is going to need to run the same software as Linux PCs to have all that good FOSS support, and I don’t think I’ve rad any rumors about x86 phones, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Risc-V is not going to be any better. Technically, the ISA of Arm is very well documented. Sure, it is created and licensed out by a single company. But that doesn't matter when the device is either locked or has so many non-documented quirks and peripherals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Bah, but thanks for the info!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Well hey, on the upside I have switched back to browsing on my Linux PC rather than my phone. I have the monitors on arms next to my end of the couch, so I can hang out with my family and watch a movie or whatever, but also have a 27" monitor hovering over my lap. And I'm already kinda old so it will help once my eyes start going, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›