Analysis of broadband affordability deemed "extraneous" by FCC chair.

The Federal Communications Commission is ditching Biden-era standards for measuring progress toward the goal of universal broadband deployment.

The changes will make it easier for the FCC to give the broadband industry a passing grade in an annual progress report. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's proposal would give the industry a thumbs-up even if it falls short of 100 percent deployment, eliminate a long-term goal of gigabit broadband speeds, and abandon a new effort to track the affordability of broadband.

Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act requires the FCC to determine whether broadband is being deployed "on a reasonable and timely basis" to all Americans. If the answer is no, the US law says the FCC must "take immediate action to accelerate deployment of such capability by removing barriers to infrastructure investment and by promoting competition in the telecommunications market."

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Comcast and all the rest of those shithead parasites lobbied the heck out of this, I bet. And money talks big, especially in our current whorehouse, I mean, white house.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Every other country in the world is trying to make their population smarter and more connected, and we're trying our hardest to make our people stupider with less access to information.

    Why have we allowed the most corrupt, despicable people to make decisions for us?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 323 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    I fucking hate that every couple of years we just backpedal on everything. So god damn exhausting.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 124 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It takes so long to fix everything, too!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This is the part that bothers me so much about everything that is being dismantled right now. It took forever to get it to where it is, and it still needed a lot of improvement. And it was just smashed seemingly overnight.

    It's like a sandcastle. Takes forever to build a good one, and it takes some asshole one second to step on it and destroy the whole thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    takes some asshole one second to step on it and destroy the whole thing.

    Absolutely. The last one to just go "lol nah" and demolish the working class this hard was Reagan, and we were still reaping the fallout from those asinine policies when 2016 hit!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We had never actually fixed any of the shit that Reagan broke. They kept doing more of the same stuff he had started

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It took forever to get it to where it is, and it still needed a lot of improvement

    It not just took forever to get to where we were but it seems like most of the good things Biden was able to get passed were long term investments. Money spent for something that would help in ten years.

    Now it’s money spent and thrown away.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If only we could chart that and see which political party is in charge at which points, and then never vote for the one that puts us here ever again... Oh well

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    We can though, first time was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 with funding being released in 2010. D president, D Senate, D house.

    By 2012 it became obvious that the commitment lined out in the 2009 bill weren't going to happen and a meek attempt to claw back the funds was made. D president, D Senate, R house.

    2021 sees the access broadband act. D president, D Senate, D house.

    By 2025 it became obvious that the commitment lined out in the 2021 bill weren't going to happen. R president, D R Senate, R house.

    The only constant is a Democratic Senat so clearly that's the problem! Right?

    Edit: wrong session for 2025 caucus. It's all Rs there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    We need a new 4th branch of government that's in charge of infrastructure and public welfare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, we really just need to stop selecting between two bad presidents over and over again. If you always pick the second-worst option, you’re going to have a bad time. Pick the best option. Ranked choice voting is the only way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    How would this branch be structured? How would it interface with the other branches? How would its members be appointed? What does "Infrastructure and Public Welfare" entail? Why are "Infrastructure" and "Public Welfare" grouped together? What powers would it have to carry out its job, and what specifically is that job? Based on those previous answers, how would it solve any existing or foreseeable issues? Why would it be better positioned to solve those issues than a change made within the existing three-branch framework?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And money. Infrastructure is all cost, no profit, no income source, and damn expensive.

    A separate branch only solves the political will half of the infrastructure problem, but we also need a consistent, large budget to actually keep up

    And personally I’d vote to give it all to Amtrak and transit. Every time we add a highway or more lanes to a highway, we’re increasing infrastructure costs that we already can’t afford to keep up with. Why are we still digging this hole deeper?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    It’s because USA has nukes my friend. The only way your enemies can attack you is through asymmetric warfare, mostly by corrupting your political system so that you attack yourself.

    If you’ve wondered why everything looks like a coup since he got in, perhaps it is because it is one.

    https://lemmy.world/post/31401705

    https://youtu.be/AaKFx5rxdmA

    https://smartelections.us/

    https://electiontruthalliance.org/

    And if you’re wondering why Democrats like Tim Walz are not even interested in investigating it themselves, well, the existence of certain files and whether or not they are disclosed could have something to do with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Such a predictable outcome by the shittiest people on the planet.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Didn't ISPs just get tens of billions of dollars to expand high-speed connections to rural areas? For the second time?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes! And I'm honestly very thankful for it. The federal grants are the main reason I have affordable gigabit-speed fiber internet way out in here in my rural county. Without it, I'd be stuck with 10mb DSL, crumby and expensive satellite based options, or very limited 4G/5G based hotspot internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Actually I remember reading a few weeks ago that BEAD money was cut. At the time I was thinking the Appalachians are gonna thank that one person who's totally one of them and their friend, J.D. Vance, for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    I live in the Appalachians. I'm confused about whom you're referring to. I'd assume you mean Trump, but he's not one of us. He's not Appalachian at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm a bit confused, I explicitly wrote J.D. Vance, why would you assume Trump? :-D

    He had the whole book taking up his Appalachian heritage didn't he? The end of my comment was of course sarcastic, because all he's doing is betraying rural America including the Appalachians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ah ok. I thought you were referring to two people, one vaguely and then that person's friend, Vance. My confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ah I can see how it can be read that way! Sorry. Maybe I messed up the commas again. I'm perpetually confused because the rules are different in English and German.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    English can be silly like that. If we were talking in person, I would be able to understand from the inflection in your voice by what you meant, but in text, it's easier to misinterpret what was meant. It was my mistake.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 55 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    10 years from now USA is gonna be a 3rd world country with all these cuts.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Trump was always obsessed with "shit hole countries". Now he's turning the US into one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    He wants us to be exactly like Russia. Complete shithole company run by the oligarchy, who live lavish luxury lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Certainly seems that way.

    No regulations to support a reasonable standard of living for the peasants.

    Oligarchs mooching off everyone else.

    Americans have lost so much in the last few months, not only with the bullshit spending bill but just the erosion of the rule of law and the democratic process.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I wish someone would look up what "3rd World" means and stop conflating the unaligned movement with poverty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You should look up how many people in the US are under the poverty line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Next up EPA switches to visual inspection of water sources for purity.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They'll just have AI do it. Can't afford real eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Honestly expecting them to defluoridate water any second now, citing quack sources, and will then be aghast at skyrocketing dental issues.

    ... Dental will still be a luxury insurance, of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It's funny that you think they'll inspect it at all.

    It will be left up to the states, and only blue states who actually care enough to fund their DEP will do anything.

    Which would 100% lead to illness and death.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    Keep poor people in the dark or they won’t vote for you.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    other country: lets bring in gig speeds Japan: futile we have and are testing terrabytes.. America: i like cheese.. govt cheese

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Terabit per second speed is not impressive for backbone links. I could go to the office tomorrow and grab all the stuff needed to install one on our line through the alps, just by bundling 3 links of 400 Gbit/s with stuff we already have, and I'm working for a small to medium ISP.

    What you are likely referring to, is the 1 Pbit/s over 1800 km demonstration that NICT presented at the OFC this year. That's impressive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    From a Swede with gigabit internet: didn't you Americans already give a lot of money to your ISPs to build fiber? Maybe time to demand a ROI?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Please don't remind me.
    I wish these companies would all just go bankrupt and die already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Kinda hard when they’ve gone full mafioso and split up the country into territories so that we only have like one choice and have to be a customer. Because capitalism runs on no competition and monopolies, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    $100+ a month is normal, and gigabit internet is not available everywhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

    Faster broadband is good. Who fucking cares what political party?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    For rural communities to get higher speeds ISPs have to actually use the money the government gives them for increasing rural community internet speeds on increasing rural community internet speeds. If broadband is defined as "one house in the county has access to internet as fast as your grandparents had growing up" then they've already met their goal and they don't need to spend any money and collect pure profit from government subsidies.

    Biden thought that was bullshit and established policy to direct them to do the right thing. The current administration, however, is more than happy taking their checks to the back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We should not be giving private entities cash without rigid metrics and timelines. In fact, we should claw back what we've given them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

    When will people who say shit like this wake the fuck up and realize that life is political?

    Grow up and deal with it like everyone else, fucking cowards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It's especially funny how Republicans are against regulations because according to them, it stifles progress and innovation. So why are they against regulations that try to force progress and innovation?

    Of course we know why, because it's all a lie. They just want more money for the 1%. How there is even a single (non-1%'er) idiot left that votes for them is waaaay beyond me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    FCC: Doing our job deemed extraneous.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Broadband quality:

    Great

    Good

    Decent

    Whatever ✅

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Analysis of broadband affordability deemed "extraneous" by FCC chair.

    The royal court is displeased with matters of the common peasantry

    We will kill the effort with but a word

    We will accept no further pleas for explanation

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Sounds like bullshit coming down the pipes to try and distract us from the news that the commander in chief is a kiddy diddler

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Such great. So many again

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    3 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post