What the fuck
post
As an AMD GPU person I've been chuckling at the Nvidia drama from my high horse, but I guess I'm not safe either lmao
You think she has a Chinese boy toy on the go?
Wouldn't you?
Hello yes, is where we sign up for our chinese boy toy?
Your government-sponsored Chinese boy toy will be assigned by the agency shortly and will arrive by mail in 6-7 business days
Jensen's ladytoy was also a Huang.
So it might even be a third cousin
There are 35 million Huangs in Taiwan and China- it’s the third and seventh most common last name in those countries, respectively (it’s also the fifth most common last name in Vietnam, but it’s often romanized differently from Vietnamese).
Taiwan doesn't have 35 million population, you're thinking of 35 million Huangs in China. Taiwan has over a million of them too, though.
Team Red is not the Nvidia protest option we thought it was, especially since AMD is now a data center-first company too. I bought a 7900 XTX a few months ago because it was the only 24GB card still under $1k, but now the price has doubled.
Data centre first company is what burned any goodwill I had for AMD. What a complete misstep.
Edit - we kept them alive for the last 15 years, and this is the thanks we get.
Are you guys just now learning that corporations have a legal obligation to their shareholders and nobody else? It's literally built into their DNA like an animal's drive to reproduce.
Anyone running AMD who made a different choice would be violating their fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders.
That's how C corps are designed.
They don't have a legal obligation to their shareholders. This is a a huge lie that is told to scapegoat the CEOs that enable consulting firms to carve up competitors for even bigger money. They have an obligation only to the board members.
This is an IMPORTANT distinction that is what fuedalized corporate America to such an extreme.
That isn't what fiduciary duty means. It means they can't purposefully run the company into the ground. But any choice that can be justified, for example as "I don't believe this AI thing is going to be all that and we should remain focused on our consumer markets for long term growth" immediately nixes any complaint about fiduciary duty. I mean unless the board can produce evidence that that's a lie.
If the board disagrees with the CEO about the direction of the company they can replace the CEO, but again, the board and CEO can do anything reasonable.
I mean it’s the same thing as the RAM industry colluding fo make prices exorbitantly high. Of course they’re all going to maximize profits at all costs, they get sued into losing their roles at the company if they don’t loot everyone for all their money at all times
For most was it ever about protest? If on Windows where most people are NVIDIA has been the better option for a long time, but if using Linux NVIDIA turns into a headache to get working properly compared to AMD.
So this is more like a Pixel phone situation where if someone wants custom roms like lineageOS or GrapheneOS to get away from corporate spyware its one of the top choices. Ironic because Google sucks, but other OEM phones and rom communities for it have died out. And same applies to AMD due to NVIDIA linux support being subpar and becomes a nightmare once support drops completely.
I think mine was maybe a little over $1k, back pre-RAMageddon.
https://www.amazon.com/ASRock-RX7900XTX-PG-24GO-Graphics/dp/B0BTPK5J68
It looks like one can get them at about that price still.
Anyone who has any loyalty to any company is not safe. The only safe option is to treat companies as your rival. They will charge you as much as you let them, your job is to reciprocate that rivalry by voting against them (and for yourself) and abandoning them for their rivals as soon as they turn on you.
People liked AMD for the same reason people like Pixel phones. Not because the company is wonderful, but the hardware allowing more modification and support for open source activities. And very little options when it comes to the hardware criteria they are looking for compared to those that stick to corporate operating systems.
Wish more companies were consumer coöps. Shareholders will always be unaligned with stakeholders.
As a 3DFX person I have been asking, what is a pixel shader?
I understood that reference.
Trust me Lisa Su us also having a big LOL and champagne on this news.
You didn't ever wonder why they never tried to pick up the market share that Nvidia abandoned?
he's clearly just Mrs Doubtfire-ing
imagine the thanksgiving banter
She's the one that called the FBI after he brought his new girlfriend to dinner last year.
"Yeah my GPU's might not be "the best" but I don't need a fling on the side just to feel anything. BTW, how are your CPU's going, still cuddling up to Mediatek? Pathetic. Processors for babies."
“Family Business” except never forget that AMD bought their way in by purchasing ATI, the once beloved Canadian video chip and card manufacturer. I miss the All-in-Wonder ❤️
Oooooooh wow that's the relation.
I won't lie this story is straight out of like 17th century Europe lol
Not really ! My family is full of musicians, just because it's an habit of the family. Maybe the technology is the same for them ?
And my family is all engineers too. That's not the comparison. The French and English were always fueding, but French and English royalty intermarried.
AMD and nVidia are direct competitors. Corporations today are essentially microfeudalist societies without strict borders. The CEOs are the "top executive brass" of the company owners. The company owners, usually the people make up the board, are the top stakeholders.
In our modern age of corporate feudalism, Royalty is the billionaire class. Executives and board members of publicly traded companies are the nobility. Just like in Feudal Europe, Royalty can have as much power and oversight as they desire, and nobility is often granted quite a bit of power dependant on wealth and benefit to royalty.
One greater family controlled both France and England. One greater family controlled both AMD and nVidia.
So they... aren't?... having an affair?
What are you doing step-CEO?
Are you sure? Wig, lipstick, mascara, same person. Have they ever been seen in the same room together?
Now I wonder why AMD has better Linux drivers then Nvidia.
Maybe because AMD has a lower marketshare than nvidia and having open source drivers is one way to differentiate themselves from nvidia and to have a USP.
Cause they have been open source for longer.
Ya like if they all are the same, then why aren't they? Like is it to maintain the veneer of non monopoly?
"It's a big club and you aint in it." - George Carlin
First cousin once removed. Supposedly they first met as adults in an industry meeting when their careers had already launched. It does seem like a crazy coincidence though.
It's insane how many people are brainwashed into believing that historic wealth distribution doesn't have an overwhelming impact on present wealth and success.
My parents achieved middle class from poverty but never learned how to manage money because their parents were uneducated farmers, orphans, etc. I grew up around both rich and poor kids. Most of the kids who went into "high skilled" "professional" roles had parents in those disciplines, and the wealthiest have the wealthiest grandparents. Even the "pros" that didn't have that were far from poor. The poorer kids I knew are blue collar at best, but many fell to addiction, suicide, or fell off the face of the earth.
For every decamillionaire who came from the middle class, there are dozens whose families were already millionaires in the 20th Century.
Yes, but it’s still a massive coincidence that cousins who never met, a decade a part in age, raised by different families in different parts of the US are both CEOs of the two largest GPU manufacturers in the world.
I agree it's a hell of a coincidence, but also a hell of a long game and they were both EEs.
Rough timeline:
- 1984 Huang graduates and starts working at AMD
- 1985 ATI founded
- 1986-1993 Huang bounces between grad school and other tech companies
- 1993 Huang founds NVidia
- 1994-2012 Su graduates and starts at Texas Instruments, goes on to other companies
- 2006 AMD buys ATI
- 2012 Su joins AMD
- 2014 Su becomes CEO of AMD
Back in 2012, both companies were not that significant. Very different from today. Like Intel was worth roughly 8x NVidia and AMD combined.
So did AMD, 6 years after buying NVidia's biggest rival, intend to hire Huang's relative to form a GPU cartel? Maybe. There's plenty of other scenarios where it seems more obvious that things were done because of family connections. I wouldn't be surprised if it came out that was the case, but I'm on the coincidence side (for now).
okay but both Su and Huang come from middle class immigrant families not families with generational wealth.
I'm surprised people didn't know this already.
She's also been screwing us over so i guess it's time to check who she's been fucking.


top 100 comments