[–] -1 points 6 months ago (10 children)

I'm not an american, but from my perspective you only had two decent candidates in the last election on the Democrat side: Gavin and AOC. Not sure how Gavin stands now, but AOC seems great. Kamala was a disaster then, will be a disaster again.

If you didn't, watch her (AOC) speak at Munich security conference. She is a great speaker: smart, eloquent and logical. I don't see her as direct as Carney, she is more careful with words. But I wouldn't want to be in her position if she wins: she will have sooo much crap to clean up after current disaster...

Carney is also an amazing speaker. I don't know his internal politics and what it means for Canada, but foreign policy, communication and speeches give an impression of a decent leader. Very direct statements, no ambiguities or guessing. I was really surprised to hear a politician speak this way. European leaders are usually softer in their statements, leaving the doors open, especially when it comes to relations with the USA. Carney flat out said that the USA is unreliable.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    there is a company behind, so they can be identified... but, the foundation is in Canada, so probably California law doesn't apply to them. unless they start to sell their products in California. not a lawyer so I don't know for sure how those things work...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    paid for a year a while back when they had some discount. will not renew.

    like others have said:

    • no standard protocols support to use other clients and their clients are shit
    • no client improvement in the last year
    • their pricing buckets are weird and the price per gigabyte is too high

    it's a niche product. if e2ee is the primary goal, that's fine. it's not what most people want/need. as far as I see it, we lack a good service with no tracking/mining and tuta is just too much limiting.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    What arrogance?

    As I have been told, for years, av on Linux is used to protect windows machines on the network. Companies use clamav to scan files on network shares used by windows machines. Also, what about virus database/definitions, are they having Linux signatures?

    Since I have no windows machines on the network, why? Has this changed and I should run clamav to scan for Linux viruses? Do signature files actually have signatures for Linux viruses?

    Android most often is compromised by malicious apps, not viruses, which is not really (yet) a problem on Linux. Once it becomes a problem, I will install av. So far it has not been an issue.

    Anyway, effectiveness here is interesting

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClamAV

    What do you run?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›