Bavarian-based enterprise Linux distribution vendor SUSE is laying off 10% of its global workforce as a result of AI and automation.

SUSE CEO Dirk-Peter van Leeuwen sent out an internal memo to its staff that AI and automation are leading to changes in the industry... and resulting in a 10% global workforce reduction at SUSE. Those affected are set to be notified beginning tomorrow, 4 November.

These layoffs follow voluntary separation offers sent out in September albeit not with enough uptake to satisfy management.

The unfortunate state of the industry.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 3 days ago

they could have expanded. we could have had a better life because of automation.

money god says fuck you though

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    No, it's laying them off because it's November and it will juice their financials. AI is a convenient scapegoat

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Evidence for this besides hopes and dreams?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    sad, never a big fan of yast but appreciate a european owned distro

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I've never used SUSE, but it's one of the oldest Linux distributions still going. Sad to see this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    The Yast2 GUI system admin tools made my transition from Windows super easy. It was like the Windows old school control center. You can change your kernel boot parameters via GUI, adjust services and the enabled/disabled and other stuff via GUI, add or remove packages with check marks. You could probably do everything without touching the command line.

    A lot of that has now moved to a cockpit-client launcher, which is just OK, doesn't have the same buttons and knobs as YAST.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago

    Cannot wait for the news that SUSE becomes the latest target of exploits and such due to vibed cuck code... all because they fired people who knew how to do their job correctly for "AI and automation".

    We need no nonsense leaders who will do everything in their power to kill generative AI like centuries ago. Another project is slowly killing itself by a thousands cuts by a radioactive knife.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago*

    No, SUSE lays off workers because it has been purchased by private equity ghouls and they have been looking to flip it quickly this past year.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    Never was my distro of choice and guess that won’t be changing.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago

    I have a paid for SUSE subscription and have been to susecon a couple times, I won't use it anymore after this.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago
    [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    As an OpenSuse user, should I look for alternatives? I do like OpenSuse as it is now...

  • source
  • 17 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 9 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Bit offtopic: I don't know where you got the thumbnail, but that beer was probably really good. https://klosterbrauerei-weissenohe.de/ produce a lot of really good stuff for Lidl here in Europe at least, and especially their Hampstead gin.

    And on topic, this isn't the best look for SUSE. I looked up how many work at SUSE and it's around 1900, so 10% people fired means ~190 people, almost 200. Rough.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    SUSE has been on my todo list to try for Linux distributions but now, SUSE can go suck a dick🖕💩

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Good news, everyone is doing it!

    Time to return to monkey and do things properly.

    With gentoo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    The Linux kernel is doing the same thing. What’s your aggressive point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    His point is this is the frediverse and blind hatred of ai with zero nuance and no room for context or discussion is easy updoots. So gotta farm em while they are fresh.

    To be fair this does suck, but from what im seeing here theres nothing to indicate that it isn't anything more then a bog standard lay off. Ai is teh reason this time but its no different then any other lay off. They suck, but its not like they are axing 50% of their work force on purpose to replace them with ai.

    They also seem to be giving out proper compenstation and even offered people the choice first before doing forced lay offs. Which is about as professional as you can expect from a company doing any form of lay offs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    Never was intrigued by this os. Always wondered if I was being somehow biased. Now I know it was just good instinct.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Disappointed in Suse. Guess all they do is try to stuff their pockets.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Considering this is a very small lay off, was handled extremely well and provided proper offers for staff to choose to leave instead of just surprising people. I wouldn't call this a cash grab by literally any real means. Companies do lay offs, its normal. The only stated claim here is that AI is fucking the market and they are downsizing.

    Which it is. Thats litterally just facts.

    Theres nothing to indicate here least i can see, that says they are force rolling out AI to cash in on a quick buck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago

    10% is small? Wat? If someone reduced your salary by 10%, would you just go "oh, that's minimal! I won't even notice it!"?

    And they aren't saying the market is getting smaller. Nowhere does phoronix report that. You're just making stuff up. With a more efficient workforce they should be able to pay more, get more work done, and handle more customers with the sane amount of people.

    No. What they are doing is spreading the same work over fewer people who aren't getting a pay raise, meaning 10% decrease in personnel costs, which the upper management can pocket.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    Now that I had found some stability and peace of mind using Tumbleweed. Oh well, I guess it's time to start distro hopping again, not in the mood thoough.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago*

    10% is fairly conservative & you are not using SEL, but rather the community version. I think it's not worth it. (plus it's not like you can use a non-Linux kernel that does not have Ai contrib)

  • source
  • parent