The move was due to fears that messaging functions on the platforms allowed strangers to groom children, according to the newspaper. It suggested similar reselling platforms, Depop and Facebook Marketplace, would also be included in the list of banned sites.

I don't even know what to say to this LOL.

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

Next: UK Government to ban children interacting with other people in real life

Most child abuse comes from family members, therefore under-16s will be banned from interacting with their parents and relatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    The impact is already creeping up from the constant infantilisation of teenagers and destroying their autonomy based on falsified premises. Expect more and more articles indicating the discriminatory situation teenagers are put in.

    The fact people are being reduced to children makes it so much easier to force people to support fascism - discrimination is what is happening.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    This is actually insane. There are so many other platforms that should take priority in "child protection" before Vinted and eBay.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 15 points 3 hours ago

    The government announced it would ban under-16s accessing social media in June this year, with children prevented from accessing 10 of the biggest platforms. YouTube will also be banned for under-16s, but YouTube Kids - a version of the video-sharing app designed to be safe for children - will not be included in the measures. A complete list of affected platforms has not yet been released, but the government said it would cover those "whose purpose is to enable social interaction and which allow users to post material". That means platforms that have livestreaming or features that enable the potential for strangers to contact children will also be restricted, which includes gaming sites.

    Don't worry they're on it. They will ban everything, just in case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 29 minutes ago

    How about banning the government from Xitter instead?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago

    Oh no what if they buy and sell!!?? Poor kids???

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    A 15 year old isn't a child.

    Trans kids are hurt by measures that block them from finding community and help online that are blocked irl for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 hour ago

    Fully agree. Their excuses are straight up propaganda based on the government themself manipulating the masses.

    The fact is, if both points where respected we wouldnt be in the situation we are now. Its quite sad to be seeing autonomous people being forcefully stripped off their rights, identity and everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 hours ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago* (5 children)

    There's already plans to ban social media for under 16s AFAIK

    Not sure if that'll apply to Lemmy or not, but I guess Lemmy servers could just geoblock visitors from regions that enforce this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    Honestly, good. This isn't a place for children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 child)

    I was actually going to say something about teenagers not needing to be active on sites like eBay. But then I remember my older brother starting his toy collection years ago when he was 13-14 buying toys on eBay,

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    contact your local MPs.

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 16 points 1 day ago

    Meanwhile the public are looking seriously at whether the government has completely lost the plot.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    What next, ID verification required to open an Argos catalogue? Go into Tesco? Although, Tesco already charge you more if you are under 18 as children can't join their card system

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Can under-18s hold many loyalty discount cards? I expect co-op stores allow it from 16, as they've been supporting votes at 16 for years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Its due to laws on data harvesting on children. If coop doesn't harvest that data then they could give them to children too. Tbh more people should probably be mad at Tesco for harvesting that data, but they don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, co-op are likely being all ethical again. Or trying to.

    Look at the checkout conveyor dividers in Morrisons some time: they literally say "Morrisons More Card: more conveyor snooping" or something similar. People just don't realise the cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    Naughty children! How dare they shop!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Just ban the internet at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Seriously, this is getting out of hand. Pure authoritarianism is what this is, constantly nagging and nagging and people are naive enought to trust such motives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 17 hours ago*

    This was the intention all along.

    That, and MasterCard and VISA wanted more businesses to use card authentications for age checks. Businesses have been skipping authentication to save on fees, and they knew that even if other technology came along they'd still get a few more. Literally, the OSA only vaguely describes ID or face scanning (because the technology didn't really exist at the time), but spells out card transactions as the default method of age verification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Can we seriously look at banning this government? Greens seem sensible enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    I'll take the greens. Only candidate in the last election who has done anything beneficial to society. Last I saw her she was taking part in a clean up at the local beach.

    Labour candidate was a gymbro. Libdem hadn't bothered to update his profile since running in a previous election over 100 miles away, Tory is current MP and voted to allow water companies to endlessly dump sewage on the beach. She is also a fucking moron (or happy to pander to far right hate mobs) based on the few posts I have heard of from her.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    God, you can't sell anyone these days.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 18 hours ago

    Luckily, UK govt will adopt Sam Altman's Orb and everyone can probe who they are by eye scan. O Brave New World...

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago*

    .... but why?

    And who the fuck is Lisa Nandy?? Bit of a shit article, BBC.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/DeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 5 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Strange. I'd think they'd want everyone shopping.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago

    So you're going to ban amazon.co.uk too right... right?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago

    Keeping vulnerable kids under the thumbs of bad parents and tyrants.

  • source