113
UK Government 'looking seriously' at banning under-16s from Vinted and eBay (www.bbc.com)
submitted 6 hours ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
๐Ÿคฃ 2
 

The move was due to fears that messaging functions on the platforms allowed strangers to groom children, according to the newspaper. It suggested similar reselling platforms, Depop and Facebook Marketplace, would also be included in the list of banned sites.

I don't even know what to say to this LOL.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] -1 points 3 hours ago (8 children)

This isn't a place for 15 year olds.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 4 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

    Ageist

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

    Shouldn't you be in class somewhere?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 hour ago (3 children)

    I didn't say I was 15, just to not be ageist to 15 year olds

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 0 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    So, if we're done with the snarky comments and insults, answer me this. What benefit does it do either party for under 16s to have direct interactions with random adults in their 30s/40s+? Because that's most of the user base here. Not everyone is out to engage in good faith and many younger folks may not see dangerous situations ahead of time.

    I don't see a situation where a random 15 year old and a random 40 year old need to interact here. The maturity levels, intersts, and life experiences are completely different between them, and I'm having a hard time seeing why a middle aged adult would want to have serious interactions with a literal child. Sure, they're a teen, but they aren't legally adults.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 29 minutes ago (1 child)

    What benefit does it do either party for under 16s to have direct interactions with random adults in their 30s/40s+?

    For one example, if they're trans and find info about diy HRT younger than they would have otherwise and are spared years of irreversible changes and dysphoria.

    Or, you know, just that they're people who should have a voice and ears and not be barred from the wider societal conversation from everything about TV shows to national politics to educational policies, that they should have a voice in, and are indeed pubescent and more mature than actual children at thinking.

    To engage with other people, practicising their online interaction skills, as they're not going to suddenly be magically more able to resist disinformation and stuff at 16 because of a few months of brain development, the more important thing is practice and being exposed to online content.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 13 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

    There are plenty of online resources regarding this information that don't require young people to interact directly with random older people who may or may not be acting in good faith. All of what you described, with the exception of online interaction, is available without placing children and teens in a place where they can be groomed or exploited by bad faith actors.

    As for the other side, middle aged adults have no need to be directly interacting with teens and younger that they met online. There's no benefit for those individuals and too much room for exploitation to occur without moderation.

    I don't see a situation where the benefits outweigh the risks for teens and children interacting with random adults online. I think we're going to have to agree to disagree here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent