Today has been especially bad, and was inspired sadly by about 6 straight posts of only negativity here.

I want to say that being negative towards something is not a bad thing, it's very valid to critique things. However, a community becomes toxic when the majority of it's content is negative.

Gaming is an obvious one. It's very obvious all around the internet that gaming communities are negative generally, and Lemmy certainly takes the cake. In the case of GTA 6 coming out this month we can (and have) had multiple stories about Rockstar's unethical practices, the pricing, ownership, and to be clear I agree with all of it. However, there is also valid positive things that people want to discuss but are immediately downvoted to hell, or have comments brigaded on with responses like "Don't you know about X, Y, or Z??"

I've been in comment threads where people have told me that they are afraid to post here because of the responses they might get. Now this is absolutely true everywhere, and we will often respond "You just have to tune them out" but the scales are shifting to the majority of responses are negative.

New users will not simply block/tune out the majority of commenters. New users will see that a community is toxic and turn around and go back to where they felt it was better.

This is the root of my frustration - that Lemmy is no longer a geeky place where people can talk about Star Trek and Linux - but that it's becoming a toxic place where if you aren't talking about why Star Trek and Linux are the only good things on the planet that it should be called out over and over.

Worse is that the scales a tipping to simply being "If it is popular, it is not good" which is a huge red flag for toxic community. To be clear it does not mean that if something is popular that it must be good, but instead we are falling for the same trap that is on corporate social media.

Anger and toxicity are fun, they are dopamine hits. So when there's a huge post about <> and everyone dogpiles, everyone has that dopamine hit and it spreads, and it makes people want to dogpile more. Unfortunately I think this has left individual posts, and this is now driving a large part of our comment sections, that people feel included when they are all dogpiling on a popular thing. It's addictive.

It's incessant and exhausting being here some days.

Some examples to think on:

  • Harry Potter fans (who have already said they will not buy anything from Rowling again and are aware) who still want to enjoy the books/movies they already own, but are shouted down and downvoted
  • Sports fans posting about football, to have jokes about "sportsball" made to them.
    • (Is that really any different from nerds being made fun of by jocks in highschool, only this is in reverse and worse yet, we're supposedly more mature now?)
  • Freaking pumpkin spice. The world is on fire and people get a tiny bit of joy out of cinnamon and allspice, can we let them just enjoy that?!

I think that sums it all up, I wish people could just enjoy things here without having the majority of comments be about why they shouldn't enjoy it. I think this attitude has already lost of a good chunk of users who could be adding to the fediverse, instead now back on corporate social media.

It's anecdotal but I've shown the fediverse to 3 other people who are trekkie nerds like me. They gave up in less than a week not because the fediverse was complicated, but because they felt like they weren't wanted here.

Be the positive change, be encouraging. Don't belittle for someone for liking a popular thing if you like something more obscure, instead post about obscure thing and why you like it and share it! Inform users of things like Rowlings insane shit-headery, but don't demean them for still enjoying the books. If you don't like sports that's cool, but let them cheer on their team.

Thanks for listening. I'm going to have a pumpkin spice latte now.

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 12 hours ago* (7 children)

I saw 3 posts in a row today saying hope is evil and stupid. Ya'll sound like fucken Morgoth shut up. Would Gandalf have said that!? OR DID HE SAY THE LITTLE THINGS KEEPS THE DARKNESS AT BAY

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 41 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    Hey I like gardening and having little plants!

    Don't you know that the soil is going rotten and the planet is dying how could you even do are you even tracking your water consumption?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Gardening? Did you make your own tools and harvest the seeds from a free community garden, or did you BUY them from a CORPORATION?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Purity testing seems to be a feature built into social media.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

    I post climate articles I find interesting rather indiscriminately probably 70/30 downer/upper, but the engagement I see in terms of upvotes/comments is probably 90/10 downer/upper.

    I'm saying this because I dont think there's a dirth of positive content, it's just not being encouraged to flourish.

    Be the change you want to see in the world and upvote/comment on positive content. Even silly affirmations help things float up the algowall.

    If you want to take things further, post positive and organic content! Adopt a community and make it your goal to add something to it every week - start growing the positive culture you want. It'll feel rough to start because you likely won't get any engagement, but keep at it so folks know its okay for them to share as well.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 9 hours ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    A+ silly affirmation! Spread those around like they come with measles!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Just so you know - you inspired me. While I was doing my nightly read-up on my RSS feeds, I made the deliberate choice to pull mostly positive climate stories, and put them in my posting queue.

    They won't pop up right away (I try to space things out), but now >50% of my queue for the week is highlighting positive news. That may shift as the week evolves and news breaks, but this is looking to be a more positive week from me :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    It's a good way to do it and also if you think there is a lack of a community with a proper focus on a topic (like the ones OP mentions), create it and moderate it properly.

    Nothing is stopping you from creating a Harry Potter community that focuses on the positive aspects of that world and blocks those who only put hate into the topic, nothing prevents you from doing it and working on developing it.

    You will surely find more support than you can imagine and you will help this corner of the internet become more like what you really would like it to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 8 hours ago

    I expect a lot of it is cope from people who live in the US. I know I've been a lot less cheerful for the last two years (gosh, wonder why). If I've contributed in a way that has rubbed anyone the wrong way, I apologize.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    I post football stuff all the time and don't have that problem. At least not in those threads. Posted two topics today. Now in unrelated communities Maybe, but that's not an issue other than it being a stupid thing to say.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    This take is valid, but your feed must look very different from mine.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    I see a thread like this every two weeks and I'm always scratching my head at it. I think we should have a rule about adding links the moment it's a "complain about Lemmy being mean" thread.

    https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/comment/7330552

    So I guess it's about this. There is a toxicity problem because someone made a bash thread on the Odyssey.

    Idk, I don't think it's that bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 hours ago

    Idk, I don't think it's that bad.

    Same here. I still browse my niche subs on Reddit, but I won't post there anymore because I do nothing but get downvoted and shit on no matter what I say. Here the upvotes flow freely and I rarely feel like people are being shit. Reddit is intolerable, people really think it's worse here?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 9 hours ago*

    Yes, that was me, I don't hide from my posts. However, I also realized that my frustration there was from the litany of negative posts today, and that single post didn't deserve it simply because it was the last in a long line of them. I stand by that I think it's a constant incessant amount of negativity and that's one post in a large pond of negativity, but that's why I expanded and made this post. That doesn't mean I'm going to remove that one like I regret it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 7 hours ago

    I hope you have an aggressively good day!

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    In my first year here I had a gag username and was doing the typical "snarky commenter" thing. I decided I want to make this place more delightful than Reddit, so I've moved away from that. I still joke (I will die making light of my own pain), but I try to be hopeful and encouraging as often as possible. This place is important to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    I'll say that I appreciate that. I think there are a ton of places to be snarky and sarcastic, and even in normal threads - but never to make just be a jerk. Of course if you want to that's what shitposting subs are for.

    And as an aside, I love your new username

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

    Some of it is that I believe that the internet in general has become a lot more toxic than it was when Reddit was young. Some of that is manufactured. And let's be real, a lot of people are here because they caught Reddit bans. Some entirely unjustified, yes, but your sampling is going to skew away from the more... sunshine and rainbows crowd.

    This thread makes me feel old though, because I remember these same types of posts on band forums back before 2010. The internet be snarky.

    To me, Lemmy's biggest failing is that it's just not that funny. Reddit still has a lot of great communities springing up making memes around niche topics and long dead tv shows. Too much of Lemmy is just reposting from Reddit still. It severely lacks people making their own funny content.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

    My unpopular (?) opinion is stop reading replies to your comments. I basically never do and toxicity isn’t an issue for me because of it

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    I do the same thing. It rules. I assume you won't read this, and if you respond to it I won't read that response. Be well, friend~

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    Im sitting at nearly 600 unread replies.

    The few I do are because I deliberately went back to the thread to check, and only when I had something I was interesting in reading more on. Usually that's Star Trek memes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    I think it's not just replies to your comments, it's every other comment in the thread.

    If a post says "New car game releases next week" and I want to post the comment "I like the blue cars" but every comment I see is about hating the new car game, I'm less inclined to post about my affinity for blue cars.

    My personal answer is fuck it and post about blue cars. I have generally found that when I do, I get upvotes and/or positive responses. Which is good, but the point OP is making is that not everyone feels like they can share.

    Plus this whole thing is a community. I want to have conversations with people, but I also want it to be a conversation. If you don't like blue cars, what cars do you like? Or do you prefer bikes? A response of "blue cars suck" isn't helpful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 8 hours ago

    Unfortunately lemmy has a larger than average terminally online user base, which is usually the less happy people and it is reflected in their actions :>

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

    To me four are three types of people here on Lemmy. The cool Linux user , the self hosting super private enthusiast, the toxic Linux user and everyone who got kicked off Reddit.

    A few groups are more vocal than others.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    I never got kicked off reddit. I’m looking for old Reddit.

    You know, back before it was cool, like your favorite bar, until a bunch of new people “discovered” it and started flooding the place, ruining everything. The culture changed but it still had the bar stools I liked, and some of the food was still good, so I showed up every Friday for the local fish fry. Then, the owner sold the bar to a corporate franchise and the place was gutted. Loud TVs went up, the people changed more, and I couldn’t recognize it any more. Locally sourced fish was replaced by frozen crap and even the Friday fish fry went to hell. I couldn’t take it any more.

    What were we talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 8 hours ago

    I'm not sure what your point was, but what I can say is that I really empathize with losing your local bar. Honestly, I'm sorry for your loss there. I too have had a local bar ruined because it was bought by... private equity.

    May you find your next bar soon, may their fish be fresh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 hours ago

    I think you missed a large category of users: people like me, who don't fit into any of those categories but were fed up with Reddit's continuing enshitification and finally decided they'd had enough and went looking for a new internet hangout.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

    This is actually a major reason why I don’t engage with too many communities. I know downvotes don’t really mean anything on Lemmy, but still, some people get really vicious and start throwing all kinds of shit at you and get personal just because you said an opinion they disagree with. Reddit has ruined the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 hours ago

    I'm probably one of the few lemmings who's also still on reddit regularly. In both places, I view by "Subscribed" and I have a thoroughly curated list of subs/communities. My list on Reddit is down to sports, local interest, and niche hobbies only, as those have simply not been been replicated at scale, and I'm still pretty sure I'm mostly reading real humans' comments.

    For memes, media, news, random chitchat, and shitposting, the threadiverse is much better, but there are still places I am very happy to avoid, and I'll gladly accept that I'm probably missing out on some decent conversations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

    I wish more sites disabled downvoting. It's really more of a dark pattern than anything else, and a relic from a super-sized, for-profit website that wanted to crowd source moderation. In my 30 years online, stronger, direct moderation has beat out crowd-sourced tyranny of the majority basically every time.

    We need more active, hands-on moderators, I think. You don't get a beautiful garden by sitting back and letting the weeds grow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

    I disagree fundamentally but it kind of feels like a waste to write this all out just to say that.

    I wish there was a compact way I could express that I think your line of thinking is authoritarian and wrong.

    You don’t get a beautiful garden by sitting back and letting the weeds grow.

    What I don't like about people who are so negative about the fediverse like this is that you seem to WANT a perfect clean garden that photographs well rather than a messy meadow of wildflowers, long grass and lots of diversity along with predominant modes of difficult emotions that understandably manifest during difficult periods of world history...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    Authoritarian, and functional. Crowd sourcing moderation, on the other hand, is tyrannical and toxic.

    The Nazi-bar analogy applies to other toxic groups, too. They're welcome to spin up their own sites if they want to be gatekeeping spoilers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 9 hours ago

    Authoritarian, and functional. Crowd sourcing moderation, on the other hand, is tyrannical and toxic.

    You are asserting these things as axioms, that does not make them true.

    The burden is on you to prove this causation, and anecdotes don't count.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    This thread is saving me, oh my god. I was feeling so weighed down and y'all just lifted that weight from my shoulders.

    So I'm not the only one noticing the increased negatively lately? Sorry you're all trapped here with me 😅 maybe we can heat up some tea on this cauldron of lava over here

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    Idk most teas are only supposed to steep at boiling max...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 hours ago

    It's never a bad time for a reminder to be kind to others.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

    What is unpopular about this opinion?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    It's not unpopular in meta conversations like this one, but God help you if you mention it in a comment section where people are seething about something, which is what a lot of Lemmy is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago*

    I see your point, but honestly unless you highly curate your experience it is pretty obvious most of Lemmy is negative. I am just fine with it myself and I see it as a reflection without judgement.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 hour ago

    slrpnk.net is down and Lemmy has a problem.

    More seriously I agree with you. Even one slrpnk whose instance rule state positivity this negative, doomerism, defeatism mentality was creeping in There is so little community whose vibe isn't entierely based on negativity and among it comment section are not safe.

    We need to improve each on our own if we want our cause (weither it is developping the fediverse or something else) to grow.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    I dont think this is an unpopular opinion. Delete it and reconsider everything you've done wrong in your life /s.

    I think the main issue is that a portion of the userbase is people who were kicked off reddit for being too toxic, and instead of self-reflecting, they bring that toxicity here.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 11 hours ago* (3 children)

    You sonnova bitch, I'm in! I was gonna make an espresso anyway, but I have some pumpkin spice over, so why not.

    I personally don't get the need to shit on other people's hobbies. It's a fucking hobby, if it brings you joy, you do you. I don't even care if people are good at it. Hell, I don't even care if the author doesn't align with my political views, I read and loved Ender's Game before I even consciously realised that authors are people too, and if we would only consume art from people we agree with, what a poor fucking world that would be. Like the only radio you got on your castaway island being forever stuck on a Christian rock station. Fuck that noise.

    Anyway, this latte is fucking delicious, and you know what? You can't have diversity and inclusion just for the people you like. Nobody said you got to like them or agree with their Slitherin cosplay, but kicking them out of the room does not help with the conversation, unless you really love the echo of your damn voice.

    Caveat: Nazis need not apply, I'm with Karl Popper on this, there is a bare minimum standard when it comes to community participation, and these fuckers miss it by a country mile.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 11 hours ago

    Thanks for saying this, I hope your coffee is great! I think you hit the nail on the head, art can be enjoyed even if it was not created by/in the best way. Now giving money to them is a completely different thing I'll admit, but I'll never demonize someone for enjoying a thing when that thing has done nothing. ...there's probably a better way to say that. The people saying you shouldn't read harry potter because Rowling is evil is the same as those who said you shouldn't read it because it's anti-christian. Enjoy what you enjoy, and decide for yourself.

    Agree on your caveat. The only intolerance I have is to intolerance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 hours ago

    let people be angry

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

    Some examples to think on Harry Potter fans (who have already said they will not buy anything from Rowling again and are aware) who still want to enjoy the books/movies they already own, but are shouted down and downvoted. Sports fans posting about football, to have jokes about “sportsball” made to them. (Is that really any different from nerds being made fun of by jocks in highschool, only this is in reverse and worse yet, we’re supposedly more mature now?) Freaking pumpkin spice. The world is on fire and people get a tiny bit of joy out of cinnamon and allspice, can we let them just enjoy that?!

    Arguing over trivial nonsense is modern humanity.

    but I do agree on just letting people be happy. I will point out though that Lemmy is full of banned redditors. So the arguing shit-show nonsense bullshit fuck-all topics is just a conversion period for those coming here.

    Lemmy in all topics that I've been on, have been chill and everyone seems to stay, or tries to stay more or less on topic. It's actually a site that I prefer not to be on all day long, there's not much addicting content and it's mainly still just a forum and I love that. I love that there's not attempt at trapping us here all day and wanting us to be on it 24/7 and be a content creator to the forums. It's like Reddit wants creators but all it gets is massive regurgitation of other media platforms.

    I mean I know this place is a massive regurgitation site too, that's what all social media platforms are but it's curated by the users, not by some massive algorithm.

    Reddit is and was addicting and stole some time from me. I know I could've stopped using it but on all my downtime it seemed like when there was nothing to do, it was that. Idk, not much to really say but Lemmy is a place where I can come and go and not feel trapped by algorithms.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago

    welcome to lemmy. i love you.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 hours ago

    The only posting I’ve seen about football is the aleague community that no-one ever replies in, but it’s not exactly getting bullied out of existence either.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago

    Give up the good fight and just block the idiots. They can't be reasoned with. I'm not here to endlessly debate settled social dynamics with Russian bots.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

    Lemmy has changed significantly in the two and a half years I've been using it. I wouldn't say it's got a toxic negativity problem any more than any other social media platform out there past or present. Back in the ye olde days of digg or forums before that people have started sh!t about everything under the sun.

    That problem has become more obvious on Lemmy in the last year or so, but it's nothing new and certainly not something we should solve. The bulk of Lemmy's users are ex-redditors who left either on moral grounds or were kicked out by mods/admins and they come to the platform expecting a reddit-like community, which Lemmy is slowly growing into. It's the nature of the platform, like mastodon's community is a lot of ex-twitter/x users who bring over the customs and ideals of twitter/x. There is no changing it and it's only going to get worse as long as the only federated options for social media are clones of commercial social networks.

    But even if there was some holy grail, novel, federated, social media platform unlike anything before it, you'd still have to make room for sourpusses, grumps, and people who can't tolerate differing opinions. After all it's not utopia if some people aren't invited.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    I disagree with you. One lovely thing about jlai.lu, the Lemmy french speaking instance is that it is inspired from Reddit french speaking culture, minutes the racism and xenophobia.

    There is room for evolved from the previous social media culture into something better but like OP pointed out we need to try for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 child)

    Agreed. a couple months ago I started blocking people left and right, whereas before I would block only the very worst. Now I probably block 5-10 people a day. I do think the block spree has helped. Some people are just horrible.

    I saw your post title and assumed it was regarding users who use politics as a dagger to jab people with. So many users are just impossible to converse with. They either say horrible things or put words in your mouth with little to no provocation. It's honestly made me more quick to anger than I normally am, I think.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago

    A comment reply you left me the other day actually meant a lot, and kept me sane when the weird ass hits kept coming. I meant to tell you at the time but I kind of got swarmed right about then, lol. Anyway, thank you.

    I try to do my best and offer thoughtful commentary, but it's not enough. My own block list is a mile long at this point. What's amazing to me is the vast amount of plain spite that goes into some of the responses I get, like I just killed their dog, set fire to their trash, and flattened all four of their tires before throwing a Molotov through their front window, when in fact my opinion is just one of millions voiced by some internet rando.

    I was starting to have a real problem with the anger myself, and would probably have left Lemmy by now, but then I realized there was always more to it. If someone is reacting to me with rage, either feigned or real, there's always a reason. Anger is the emotion of injustice, so how am I supposed to have injured them? And if it's feigned, then to what end? That single anger question alone has done more than anything else to shield and insulate from the immediate effects of any given response, and it has absolutely opened my eyes lately.

    I highly recommend asking it, if you're into that sort of thing: social media has proven that we're all psyops for someone, and we might as well understand how because someone else is surely eyeing us with that same utilitarian eye.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    That's not really exclusive to lemmy, that's just the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    I agree 100%. I tried Lemmy a while ago but ended up deleting my account for this reason. I’m aware of one power user over in the shitposting and memes pages who I believe is no longer active for this reason

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

    You make a great point for the greater good of Lemmy and I’m in total agreement. Sorry you got dogpiled on the Odyssey thread. That was BS

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    It wasn't the best place to put it anyway, so it's on me for that. I should have made this post immediately instead of posting there. Thanks though. It's such a obvious shift from when it goes from genuine criticism and details to what I've seen so much, which is that "popular things are stupid", which then ironically here on lemmy becomes the popular things, and I feel like I'm going crazy because no one sees the irony in that. In a very weird way, a lot of people here are hipsters. "No way man, that's too mainstream man, I'm not like that man"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    I think it's just the nature of forums / the internet. If you say something I agree with or otherwise appreciate then I'll probably just upvote and move on. If you say something I disagree with I'm more likely to respond. That's not necessarily negative in intent, often the disagreement is where an interesting conversation springs from. There's more perceived room for the conversation to flow when my response isn't essentially "yeah, me too".

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›