Any Idea what type of charging port this is, I thought it was ye old Mini B, but its too thick. We're having a clearout and found our old Camcorder, the model is a Luminox LXDV750 12.0 MEGA MAX, can anyone help me find this port?

all 80 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I did some research on this and it looks like a U-8 cable to me. Seems like it was popular with digital camera back in the day and I think I even have one kicking around somewhere. If you look there are 8 pins in that connector which would rule out FireWire and standard USB 2.0 connectors. I think this device is likely too old to have HDMI and from what I’ve seen it can actually output composite video from the 3.5 mm jack. Check out U-8 and you might even be able to find a 3.5 mm jack to composite cable that works for video out.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago*

    I’ve got the same results: 8 pin mini-usb. Found a listing in Germany that has a shot of the cable. That one has a standard USB-A (not what yours is) but the thing to note is that it’s USB on one side and component plugs on the other: https://www.ebay.de/itm/407220939580

    Edit: actually, what I found doesn’t look like U-8, but it does look like your port. Here’s a link on the Evil Empire with pictures: https://www.amazon.com/SNLLMZI-Ferrite-anti-interference-Olympus-Panasonic/dp/B0H8R53VC2

  • source
  • parent
  • Oddly enough the way I found out about this connector is that for some reason they decided to use them on some Steel Series gaming headsets. Of course the connector is recessed, so you can only use their specially shaped cable. Guess they did ok with the design because I've probably been using the headset for close to a decade

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 25 points 3 days ago*

    Update: we've found the barrel connector plug for it, so we can charge it, though i'll get a new battery, thats been sitting in a cupboard for around 14 years or so

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    ITT: So many confidently incorrect comments

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago

    That looks proprietary.

    A lot of companies back in the mid-2000s would take a USB cable and make a custom head.

    This meant that you always had to go through the manufacturer to get a replacement. It would ensure that the cable would always meet spec, but it also meant that no one could make cheaper replacements.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago

    This ebay listing has a picture of the box and that says USB 2.0.

    It's not USB mini-B as you found, nor normal USB B, for that it's too small. Nor is it Firewire like many here claim for some reason when the shape is clearly off. Mini HDMI and Micro HDMI are too new, so that's also a bad suggestion.

    I think it's probably the proprietary 8-pin mini USB originally by Nikon, also known as UC E6

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago* (8 children)

    Man the only good trend in modern tech is the homogenization of cables. Huntington down proprietary single use cables that are usually just for charging is such a fucking nightmare. Woe to anyone with a device that relies on FireWire.

    (And it’s not even a new trend—looking at you: 1/4inch plug 😒)

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (6 children)

    "USBC will replace everything!" but then they made a dozen different unnamed USBC specs that not every cable supports

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (5 children)

    Yeah but the port supports the specs. I’d rather 5 usbc ports that can do all the things than 5 random plugs with their own cables that (also) don’t support the specs of each individual plug.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (4 children)

    Not necessarily! There's multiple types of USBC ports unfortunately. It's a damn mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Okay. Provide a new port then. In the interim can I suggest a plug of some sort to put into your butt?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago (2 children)

    Why are you weirdly defensive of the USB spec?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child)

    why are you weirdly aggressive toward it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago

    I wouldn't call it weird, I work in an industry that has to deal with it almost daily lol

    Its nice that it's one plug size but it's frustrating that they had the opportunity to truly standardize with it and we wound up with this. Same thing happened with HDMI but this has even jankier results.

    I'll also give it credit that laptop docks are 1 cable but my new work laptop requires the power cord for maximum power so it's less exciting now

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 days ago

    Better Flash-shot down the port

  • source
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] [S] 7 points 3 days ago

    Side by side

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    i think i found it: https://pinoutguide.com/DigitalCameras/micro_usb_8pin_camera_pinout.shtml

    non standard micro usb 8pin, check the site if your camcorder is on that list

    it also kinda looks like a 8 pin variant of the usb mini a-b connector,

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    Prolly custom but it does look similar to this cable I got from a Panasonic DMC-FZ18 101911 101910

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    maybe Firewire. That was the high speed wire back in the day, popular with video production and MacOS.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    This is the only cable I have that I THINK is a Mini B, but as I say its too big for the port

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Yeah, that’s a mini-USB cable. Which is what the other person with a device that actually has a USB logo next to the port was looking for.

    The port on your device is Mini DisplayPort, also known as Thunderbolt on Apple devices.

    Japanese-made mini-USB variant called UC-E6. The UC-E6 port is almost exactly the same proportions as mini-DisplayPort but ever so slightly smaller. Wild that it found its way onto a Swiss-made camera. Maximum confusion, especially with the device not identifying the port as USB.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
    [–] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Looks like micro HDMI to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Looks like it, matches the socket shape exactly.

    (Lot of people having trouble knowing which part of this mini-DisplayPort to HDMI adapter to focus on. Either way, not mini-DisplayPort, just something that looks frustratingly identical to it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Its probably FireWire. Old camcorders used that. Listen to the other comment mentioning FireWire 400.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    There having a clear out

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (22 children)

    FireWire 400

    Edit: for all of you kids out there, fire wire 400 came out around the same time USB 2.0, but it was faster superior. FireWire 400 (400 Mb/s)became FireWire 800 (800Mb/s), which eventually became thunderbolt (10Gb/s). Then thunderbolt 2 (20 Gb/s), thunderbolt 3 (40 Gb/s), thunderbolt 4 (40Gb/s + PCIe 32Gb/s), thunderbolt 5 (80Gb/s with 120Gb/s boost), all over a standard USB-C connection.

    That’s 4x faster than a USB 3.2 connection, and 8x faster than a USB 3.0 connection. that’s 250x faster than a USB 2.0 connection.

    Thanks to Apple, Sony, and Intel

    (For reference, DDR5 RAM can only read/write at just over 51 GB/s)

    Thunderbolt 6 is in the works

    YwCGTf4HdeSANsf.jpg

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    That's a different shape than the port OP showed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    I remember it well. Worked in a lab setting doing computer work. The microscopes they used at the time were all firewire connections for the cameras to comminicate. It became semi annoying because it was always the 1 part not used anywhere else so they always needed to be purchased specifically for this dept at the time. It was also on tests back then for being certified since they wanted you to point out the differences and was normally thrown in as a wildcard answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    FireWire/Thunderbolt is the best interconnect protocol. Unlike usb, it is constant bitrate. USB is variable bitrate, so its throughput speed is not guaranteed. but with FireWire/Thunderbolt, you always knew how fast it was going. That’s why it was always extremely good for, in your case, scientific equipment, cameras, video editing, large, external data storage devices, etc.. and the data transfer is symmetrical rather than unidirectional like USB.

    Thunderbolt is fucking awesome. My buddy just built out a new Plex server, and his 50 TB external storage box is running at thunderbolt 4. He can stream out multiple remote 4K streams, and his gigabit Internet connection AND his local network will both be bottlenecks far before his storage device throughput will be.

    Edit: my buddies box could host 6 remote 4K streams, 12 local 4K streams, and he could edit 4 remote (local 10Gb/80Gb cached network) 8K edits in Adobe Premiere before he’d hit a single frame jitter.

    system76 makes some nice boxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

    Sorry, but what OP posted is not a FireWire 400 or 800 port. I still have a FireWire audio interface that I use and the ports look nothing like that.

    Edit: to clarify, I am saying the picture OP posted is not FireWire, not what you posted in response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

    That is a firewire 400 port, and that is the only firewire 400 port there ever was.

    You’re thinking of something else, not related to fire wire. You are mistaken.

    Edit: it seems they may have misidentified the port

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago* (8 children)

    What OP posted is NOT FireWire in any of its variants.

    Here's what FireWire 400 looks like.

    Does that look like what OP posted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Firewire also has a "small" version of the plug, I used it to copy my old DV tapes to the computer last year. (Finally, probably just in time before my old 2010 desktop PC kicks the bucket). Cameras hat the small version, it looks a bit similar to the old Mini USB.

    On the other hand, it has 8GB of RAM in it, that is something in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 days ago* (4 children)

    Also, you’re blocked. So I won’t hear your diarrhea of complaints.

    Wah wah wah! Boo hoo hoo!

    Scream into the void. I’ll never hear you, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Block me too you whiny little bitch. How's that going? Carving out your little echo chamber because you can't stand the slightest disagreement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Throwing another tantrum with another alt account?

    And you’re accusing me of being a “little bitch”?

    Lol

    How sad that “tell the truth” and “be a decent person“ send you into such a tailspin. Perhaps when you master those two things, you’ll understand the rest.

    And, of course, you’re blocked

    How many more alt accounts must you manufacture before you understand that you’re a piece of shit and I don’t wanna hear from you again?

    Because I’ll just keep telling all of your alt accounts the same thing, forever:

    You suck, and so do your opinions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    This dude is straight pathetic. He thinks someone else came at him from another account to call him a bitch. I can't fathom that level of pettiness, and then to project that on someone else, because that's what they would do.

    Nope, I'm the same shalafi I've always been, and I'll never make a second account for any reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

    Let's also acknowledge its role in making the iPod possible. While the iPod skyrocketed to popularity once it was supported on Windows and the USB2.0 dock connector was added, Firewire 400 made the original iPod possible in the first place. The then common USB 1.1 was too slow to realistically transfer music, so they chose to build the original iPod with Firewire as it'd already been used in the iMac, which had been positioned as a "digital hub" compatible with (brining it full circle to OPs question) digital camcorders of the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    No doubt! The Original iPod was the consumer breakthrough for FireWire 400 -- unless you count the MiniDisc players, but few people outside Japan cared about those (except me, wee!). I never gave up my NetMD player/recorder-- it was stolen!

    But Apple (like Sony and Intel) were heavily invested in FireWire, and the iPod seemed like the perfect kickoff, especially since USB 2.0 wasn't ready when the 1st-Gen iPod premiered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    You're like a spokesman for, or historian of, connection protocols; I love it.

    You brought up MiniDisc players. I know I could always get something from ebay, but I'm going to Japan in a couple of months and that seems like the perfect excuse to look for a used MiniDisc player, possibly Japan exclusive. Do you have any recommendations of what I should look for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (4 children)

    While we're at it - what kind of USB is this one on my old digicam from ~2003? Anyone?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (1 child)

    Mhh I could have sworn I tried that, but now it seems I can't find a Mini-USB cable in the housr, so I might not have... Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago*

    The worst part is, there are two three physical variants of mini-USB. Yours looks like mini-A.

    So you might have tried a mini-USB cable and it didn’t work because it was the wrong variant. 🤦‍♂️ Hope you find one that fits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    I believe that's a USB Mini-B port, but the perspective is messing with me. Can you share a further out photo or use a banana for scale? This photo makes it seem huge.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments