all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 83 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

Pants degrade much more than a flute made of bone, I'm not sure we can say humans didn't have pants simply because we didn't find them.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

    You make a good point .

    But counterpoint, if I could be prancing around in the woods with a flute instead of plunging computer bits, you couldn't keep my pants on if you tried.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

    Very likely, it would have been a leather or hide used as a textile. So they might have survived in burials to some degree.

    Though, what's sort of funny is that humans got close, and just never connected leggins to whatever covered the hips.

    Otzi from 3200 BC wore a loincloth, a belt, and leggings. Sort of like if you were wearing a kilt and socks that went to your crotch, and had a garter so they connected to your belt. So "pants" is all about when did people start attaching leggings to their loincloths. Or loincloths to your leggings. Apparently not super popular for most of human history.

    Oh! Anthropologically NSFW images showing the clothing. It's like assless chaps!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    To be honest I am surprised by the 3000 year old pant as very early. Pants require a lot of sewing to make, and are totally optional- ask a scot, tarzan, a legionnaire, or a tunic-wearing ancient oligarch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 23 points 23 hours ago

    I mean, pants are a specific kind of clothes.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 21 hours ago

    According to ESR dating, the age of the flute is now estimated at 50,000 to 60,000 years BP.

    wiki/Divje_Babe_flute

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

    What a fantastic example of drawing incorrect conclusions from two correct facts. Context and circumstances matter. Respect them, or this could be you!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 22 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    I reckon our ancestors were much cleverer than we credit them for and probably had pants embedded in their trousers. Some sort of clip-on solution.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 23 hours ago

    No it doesn't it suggests that the oldest known musical instrument is 34k years old and the earliest evidence of pants is from about 3000 years ago.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago

    Somebody should let Flea know that they've invented pants.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago*