WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer is vowing that Democrats will not allow President Donald Trump to put “a right-winger” on the Supreme Court once they take power, raising the possibility that his party could block a presidential nominee if there is a vacancy in the next two years.

In an interview with The Associated Press on Thursday, Schumer would not say if he would hold a Supreme Court vacancy open until after the next presidential election, as former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell did in 2016. But he said that Democrats are “not going to allow any crappy nominees” to be confirmed to the Supreme Court — or to the lower courts or Trump’s Cabinet, either.

“The bottom line is we’re not going to allow a right-winger on the court,” Schumer said.

Schumer’s pledge came two days after Democrats won a decisive Senate majority in the midterm elections — a feat few predicted a year ago, when Schumer was facing intense criticism from progressives within his party and Senate Republicans were betting that a favorable map and backing from Trump would help them keep power.

While there is still frustration with Schumer in some corners of the party, the New Yorker is expected to easily be reelected as leader by his caucus after leading them to wins in Republican-leaning states across the country. Democrats could have as many as 56 seats in the Senate if they win Mississippi and Alaska, which still have not been called — “a durable majority,” Schumer predicts, that has been 20 years in the making as he has been directly or indirectly in charge of his party’s Senate campaign operation.

all 66 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 136 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Schumer making statements trying to stave off demands for him to hand the reins to someone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    He’ll be lucky if he’s in the senate after 2028. AOC gonna take that job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago

    Still absolutely determined to "do his job" - and effectively cut off any true accountability, meaningful change, and undermine momentum. These people don't understand that (a) the fundamental rules have changed, and (b) both the people and the planet are running out of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    mehhhh, he's like Vance, a weathervane, he'll change when it's to his benefit, I think he seeing the writing on the wall.. finally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Should have had this platform back in 2017.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Fuck you, Schumer! The only thing you represent is money! I don't trust him at all. He should not be in any position of authority or power

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago

    Schumer IS a right winger. He should've been taken out from the political scene years ago

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Yes you will you fucking Israel paid jerkoff. How did all the others make it through their confirmations? Dems just acquiesce and it’s fucking insane. Kick the magas in the nuts while their down.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 child)

    While there is still frustration with Schumer in some corners of the party,

    there is frustration EVERYWHERE that's not the office of an amoral career politician in DC

    “a durable majority,” Schumer predicts, that has been 20 years in the making as he has been directly or indirectly in charge of his party’s Senate campaign operation.

    Motherfucker you had less than nothing to do with this, you actively fought it

    altr

    and fuck you too Mary Clare Jalonick

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago

    Motherfucker you had less than nothing to do with this, you actively fought it

    Reminder that he refused to endorse Democratic candidates like Mamdani. Mamdani, El-Sayed, AOC, and Bernie (among others) are the only reasons I had any hope for the US going into this election

    Schumer and Jeffries are what really concern me about 2028. They don't want progress, they want to self-enrich while maintaining the status quo

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago* (14 children)

    Alito and Thomas retirements effective November 30th in 3, 2, 1...

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (13 children)

    Yeah, no. only 20 business days left in session for them. Not enough time to replace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I am confident that if any of those three retired tomorrow the Senate would rush any old turkey that Trump nominated to confirmation in time for Thanksgiving

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • We'll wake up tomorrow with Clarence Thomas riding off into the sunset in a new RV, John Oliver poorer by one RV and $1mil/year, and a supreme court justice that doesn't need to shave everyday.

    P.S.: Someone get word to John Oliver that sooner rather than later might be a good time to rescind his offer!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Unless the Republicans remove the filibuster for SCOTUS then they can't bring it to a vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I wish Mitch McConnell was alive to hear you say that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago

    McConnell rule; it’s too close to the next election for a President of the opposite party.

    Sorry! 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago

    Schumer going to have a beer with Kavanaugh after making this strongly worded shitpost.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    UNLESS we can Make a Deal with Trump!

    -ALSO Schumer!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 11 hours ago

    Unless AIPAC says so, right Chuck?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago

    Fuck off, Schumer. You fucking DINOsaur.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    While there is still frustration with Schumer in some corners of the party, the New Yorker is expected to easily be reelected as leader by his caucus

    No, he has to go, NOW. The MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries, has been onstage long enough. They allowed the rise and re-rise of MAGA, and they've done nothing to deserve a THIRD chance to fuck it up. If they blow it again, nothing less than a full blown Civil War will save us.

    They don't deserve ANY credit for this win at all. This was all the voters. If anything, Schmuck could have gotten even more Senate seats, if wasn't an idiot. He could have had Angi Nixon's seat in Florida, but he wouldn't give any money to a Progressive.

    Call and write your Senators and Reps, and tell them that we want NEW leadership that understands the mission. These two corrupt humps have their own agendas.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago

    If Schumer and Jeffries end up leading the senate and house, 2028 will look a lot like 2024

    The centrist, do-nothing Democrats cannot be allowed to lead the party again. We did that in 2020. It was a disaster

    Mamdani is showing us a microcosm of what the country could look like under progressive leadership

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 18 hours ago

    #nochuck #nohakeem

    Sign the change.org petitions if you haven't already:

    Hakeem Jeffries: https://www.change.org/p/house-democrats-choose-a-new-speaker (currently at 824K signatures)

    Chuck Schumer: https://www.change.org/p/replace-chuck-schumer-as-senate-majority-leader (currently at 93K signatures)

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago

    Says the guy considered Hard Right in any other political circle.

    He's genuinely further to the right than Tony Abbot and Scott Morrison... People we'd never ever consider anything other than hard-right in Australia.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago*

    Fuck off chuck, you Israeli agent.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 hours ago

    Resign chuck

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Just an IDF support!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Schumer needs to gtfo of the way. Same for Jeffries.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Didn't seem to bother them when Obama was putting Right Wingers on the court...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago

    I don’t know if it’s just that I’ve heard so much news about Merrick Garland and relatively little about gorsuch, but so far I’ve actually been pretty glad that garland didn’t get confirmed.

    Every other trump nominee has been a nightmare, but gorsuch is actually sort of okay.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 23 hours ago

    Don't let him put anyone on the supreme court. Do unto them what they did unto us.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 hours ago

    Just put it in the news so they can know your plan n ram one through in 30 days. Great job Chuck. Go play mah jong or something.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    Tbh I expect the fascists to do a retirement swap in the few months they have left in power.

    Honestly the whole “lame duck” pattern in the US political system, at all levels of government, is a huge problem. It wasn’t as big a deal when people mostly acted in good faith and weren’t maliciously sore losers, but good faith is simply not present in our political system anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child)

    Please be more clear that good faith is not in the maga side, Dems still try to work by the rules and do good for We The People. It's not perfect and room to improve, but the platform with policies that are good for the majority and reduce artificial scarcity, wherever they get passed, and the one that didn't start the concentration camps. That's a huge difference, very much not the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I mean, I’d call the general refusal/inability to comprehend basic game theory as applied to two-party legislative politics just makes them predominately useful idiots. I’ll have more faith in them when I see literally anything more than performative outrage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Schumer has never denied Trump anybody for anything.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    how about he go suck a lolly and let FUCKING ANYONE ELSE step up

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    Oh? Like they prevented Boof Boi? ACB?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

    I can't believe Alito and Roberts didn't retire in time to be replaced by other fascists. I mean, I can, those people are overall very unlikely to relinquish power but damn, what a terrible fail on their side.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    I mean it's something that both sides of the aisle have in common when it comes to the Supreme Court. Remember that Ruth Bader Ginsburg also refused to retire in 2013 when Obama could have named a Democratic judge to the SC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

    Not just supreme court. Pelosi is about to retire at 86. Biden insisted on running for second term for so long he gave no time for Kamala to campaign. Feinstein served until she died even though she had severe dementia. All of those people love power so much they would rather die than let it go.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago

    You could see a scenario where they pressure/rush Alito into retirement and force a replacement vote before the current Congress term ends. Not likely but possible. I think a more likely scenario unfortunately is that the parties take turns "reforming" the court every time they control the Senate and the Executive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    They figure maga would vote for him since he sucks and enough Dems will, but that's a shame. Too bad he doesn't lose the primary to get someone decent there.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Sounds like he's already planning on it

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    kind of sta ting the obvious

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    Of course. The GOP has set the precedent, they now need to choke on it.

  • source