Voters across the U.S. overwhelmingly rejected the Trump administration’s war on Iran on Tuesday, putting their faith in Democrats who now wield enormous power to end the war — and to prevent future wars from being started unilaterally by a figure like Donald Trump ever again. The historically unpopular war and its economic consequences were among the top reasons for Republicans’ collapse.

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
59 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 56 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Man. Any one else here old enough to remember when Democrats were handed their anti-war mandate in 2008, and then Obama went on to get the high score in US led wedding drone strikes?

Anyways. If Democrats do nothing with the mandates they are given, voters inevitably gravitate towards whomever will promise them change, because ultimately, thats what voters have been asking for 30 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    Member when the Snowden leaks happened and Obama/Dems worked hand in hand with R's to continue the implementation of turnkey totalitarianism?

    Member when we argued that they were building the machinery necessary to easily commit genocide and enslave everyone in a panopticon police state FOR FASCISM; that the very existence of this machinery itself was fundamentally authoritarian and anti-democratic... and the shitlib majority believed the government could never turn against the people; that entertaining this threat was an insane conspiracy theory?

    This extreme level of gross negligence, criminal incompetence, and overall systemic failure — unilaterally across all of western "democracy" — is an indicator that we do not live in democracies, but in dictatorships of capital; that classical liberalism itself is failing humanity and the planet; incompatible with democracy, sustainability, and the long term survival of the species.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    That's what a lot of these copiod posters tend to forget, or simply weren't alive for. It's great the dems are using populist messaging again, but we've been here before. In fact we've been here so often it's kinda annoying.

    But hey, here's either another example of the dems acting as no more than a ratchet, or, maybe, improbably, they'll do the right thing and start enacting the overwhelmingly popular bipartisan policies like isolationist defensive military strategy, local manufacturing and labor incentives, and medicare for all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Watching these reruns while the ecological clock runs out is a bit worse than annoying.

    I think they actually can't implement medicare for all, because healthcare in the US is so far gone that M4A would undermine the entire system.

    How long now have people been told it's impossible? How much the relief when profit-seeking is removed from the equation? How many people will then wonder what other lies they've taken for granted?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    I remember. Then when I was upset about it, people were shocked I didn't like "the best modern president, maybe even of all time".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    This fucking purity testing, we went from some of the evilest fucking jackals tearing the nation apart starting illegal wars for profit that crashed the global economy and people are like "wHaT aBoUT ObaMaS dRoNes?!"

    You do understand that wars with a 5 trillion dollar budget aren't just ended because you say so as a president? Obama's line was to divest from those wars while minimizing US casualties, which was a massive point of contention back then, too many fucking US soldiers died and Obama opted for drones over having servicemen killed on the ground.

    Nobody wanted those fucking wars except Bush and cronies. Sometimes there isn't a perfect solution when you get the handover, you got to do damage control and at that time drones were the lesser of the evils.

    "Obama's drones" is just "Hillary's emails" in disguise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    Obama inherited two illegal wars and a financial implosion, his goal was to divest from those wars with the minimum amount of USAF casualties, and opted for drones.

    What was he supposed to do, just a full scale military retreat? That would have been a hundred times worse.

    I hate this single one criticism against Obama that the right always pushes, because he did what best he could being handed a complete clusterfuck of a geopolitical situation.

    All of that blame rests firmly on the side of the Republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    Yes, you can withdraw from an occupation of another country at any time. Nobody is forcing you to be there. It just might liss of the people making the money for you to leave. But hey, it's only brown kids dying, am I right!? Who cares about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    You're right - Obama had no choice but to drone strike Pakistanis based on if they sit down or stand up when they pee. Makes total sense, peace prize earned, fist bump that great guy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    He got the peace prize for being the first black president, breaking an over two hundred year old taboo in a nation priding itself on its liberty, if not its history of slavery and violence. It was a coming to terms, a reckoning, and it was, and it is.

    If we are talking about geopolitics, yeah no, you don't start with a fresh board when you become president. You're knee deep in shit that's been accumulating for a century, you have alliances, you have covert ops, you have wars, you have puppet dictators, you have vested economic interests as a matter of being responsible for the nation's continued existence- most of which was built on slavery, military power, subterfuge, assassinations, uncomfortable alliances, and a vast network of tentacles controlling global industrial infrastructures.

    Yeah, you don't just get to say "we're not gonna do this anymore", because the USA is way in too deep at this point. There were literally military engagements going on at that point that you couldn't just withdraw from without creating way more chaos and destruction.

    You have to see it from that perspective. It's disingenuous pointing at what is in the greater scope genuine details in how the USA has been waging foreign politics for the past century.

    It was much better than what the Republicans had done if they had stayed in power. Obama did what he could with what he had and he did a shitload of good, but it's ridiculous suggesting there is any semblance of equivalence between him and the people who created the wars for profit that enriched the Bush dynasty and their cronies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

    Lots of excuses here. For skin color? For having a hard job?

    He signed off on drone strikes targeting people based on how they were peeing. That was all the intel they had on these people and they reined down hell. On multiple people every week, for years, for his entire presidency.

    That's not a military engagement. He's a murderer. Don't make excuses for a murderer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Ann Archy

    Not very.

    I hate this single one criticism against Obama that the right always pushes, because he did what best he could being handed a complete clusterfuck of a geopolitical situation.

    Apologize for their capitulation to the military industrial complex more. It was a situation the US created and which Obama extended. Needlessly. Did they 8 additional years they extended the war help Iraq or hurt Iraq? Did it help Afghanistan or hurt Afghanistan. Did it help the US or hurt the US?

    This is baby brain level liberalism. You should change your handle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    löl you are not a tropical ding dong!

    It was a situation that BUSH and cronies created, for profit, that shook the global economy to its core. That's what Obama inherited.

    But you're literally just "both sidesing" this shit, are you a .ml user or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Reads like something someone with a not immeasurable blood lead level would think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Here's how you get stuff done with a Democratic majority in Congress and Trump as president. Draft a bill to shut down ICE operations, enact Medicare for All, etc.. and name it the Trump is the Greatest President Ever bill.

    Add in a Triumphal Arch and maybe even authorization to convert Stone Mountain into a bust of Trump. Hell I'd trade a stupid arch for MFA.

    The mental anguish it would cause Trump to even contemplate vetoing a bill named Trump is the Great President Ever bill would be too much for him to bear.

    It's worth trying.

    As far as the Iran war is concerned, draft a bill that stops the war, pays reparations and begins a normalization process and call it the Trump won the Iran war bill, or something like that.

    He's so demented and diminished now that, this could actually work.

    The "Trump Brilliantly Fixes the SCOTUS" bill, expanding the court, should be the last one in December 2028. Just in time for the new Democrat president to nominate justices.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 25 points 2 days ago

    Dems gonna take 100% full advantage of this opportunity. \s

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago*

    Personally, I am expecting Chuck and Jeffries to give a reacharound to the other aisle, instead of actually serving Americans.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (13 children)

    And the Democrats will once again ignore any mandate from voters that conflicts with the orders they get from their donors.

    There's a warehouse full of shiny new Fell For It Again awards waiting to be handed out to all the optimistic ShitLibs who saw the returns Tuesday night and are already checked out and back at brunch.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Pessimism of the mind. Optimism of the spirit. You are correct that there are a lot of ways things can go wrong, but that just means we need to put in the work to overcome those obstacles. Put that pessimism to work by using it to predict and surmout roadblocks. If you feel phone calls arent enough, go door knock. If you feels door knocking isn't enough, start organizing. If you feel organizing isn't enough, run for office. Get more and more involved in politics until you understand in your soul that a better future is possible, if only we all work together to make it happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    I spent a decade as a campaign staffer for progressive Dem candidates. I know whereof I speak when I say that's all a waste of time if your phone calls, door knocks, and organizing are running through the Democratic Party, because the people who control the levers of power inside the party will never allow anyone to the left of Kissinger to touch them. They've created all the rules to guarantee no body can stop them or take away their ability to gatekeep.all the meaningful power in the party.

    But don't take my word for it, take your own advice, bust your ass for progressive campaigns and see how far it gets you. Once you see it for yourself, you'll basically be me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (2 children)

    Thank you for the work you've done so far. The work you did may not have had a noticable effect while you were more active, but that work you put in helped get us in a more progressive space today.

    Centrist Dems are losing a lot of power and hopefully the party continues moving in a more progressive direction. The people I talk to who would not consider themselves radically progressive are expressing some very progressive ideas, like getting rid of Chuck Schumer or expanding the Senate/Supreme Court. These are ideas that a decade ago would be considered fringe and radical, but are now considered popular and average for the Dem voter base.

    I am going to continue being politically active and, not to be too confrontational, I hope that in a decade, I do not end up as pessimistic and sapped of hope as you are currently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    that work you put in helped get us in a more progressive space today.

    But it didn't, because we haven't. All that's happened is the same old party machine has revamped its branding a bit. Half that crop of DSA freshmen are Third Way plants or other dissembling opportunists using the current zeitgeist to further their careers, and the other half will never be allowed to be anything but the bait that keeps dragging left-leaning Liberals back to the center right party.

    I hope that in a decade, I do not end up as pessimistic and sapped of hope as you are currently.

    As long as you never look under the hood of the party to see how its power structures work and never question any party narratives about why policy keeps moving right no matter how much the voters want it to move left, then you probably won't. But you'll also never see the world you think you're voting for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

    You're being a bitter crumudgen because there are now more Democrats that fought and won against AIPAC money and big money politics with good policy platforms. They ran on a platform of Medicare for all, ending wars, and more progressive policies. We need to see how it shakes out, and calling them ShitLibs is just naked cynicism. When it inevitably comes down to corporate Democrats blocking these efforts, you can go ahead and call them out, but the only way forward is to primary them with better people. Pretending like the new batch is the old batch is disingenuous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Pretending that DSA Blue is in any way meaningfully different than Third Way Blue is an exercise in idealism and a refusal to learn anything at all from history. Your Fell For It Again Award will be along in 6-12 months when the fig leaf falls off and the naked neoliberalism is back on display.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    There is at best 10 anti Israel democrats politicians

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago* (4 children)

    You're being obtuse then because there's already been a house and senate votes with over 100 Democrats that voted no to Israeli money. Here are 40 Democrat senators that voted to stop the money faucet: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00080.htm. So literally take your cynicism and disappear until you can converse like an adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (2 children)

    If you know you are going to lose the vote, you are free to vote anyway it looks good to your constituents without ever really tipping your hand to who is actually pulling your strings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Do you explain everything in your life that way? Some things are just exactly as they seem, and there doesn't need to be some PR conspiracy. Hopefully we find out what they really think when we have the votes; no excuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Only those things that qualify. I have not seen the Democrats do much more to help Americans. They usually just do less damage. The Republicans are the do evil party and the Democrats are the do nothing party. I hope I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Were we? Trump said he's gonna veto everything. I mean I don't think that means we shouldn't try, but still

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago
    [–] -1 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    -> Democrats make promises to fix the Republicans' mess

    -> Democrats get elected

    -> Democrats only make things worse

    -> Republicans make promises to fix the Democrats' mess

    -> Republicans get elected

    -> Republicans only make things worse

    -> ...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago (12 children)

    There is a major budget/shutdown deadline on Dec 11th. Dems must press huge, but ending sanctions on Iran is too far. Allowing these to be used in peaceful negotiations. Instead ending funding for blockade and bases in the region must be a big ask. US establishment/WH want a budget to replensish everything they lost and continue future warmongering power. Letting the region organize itself, and offer carrots for influence, is a path to reducing US budget explosion, avoiding US and world collapse, and bring down fuel prices. There is no logic to continuing or amplifying the war. US can't afford to.

    Congress needs to ask for a lot, and WH has a better chance of negotiating with this congress than the next one.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    The recently elected Democrats don't take office until Jan. 3,2027.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (5 children)

    They have power over government shutdown on Dec 11th deadline. Very critical to (both) party direction even if they don't have all of the votes to fix america over next month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    What are you thinking it will take votes wise to make for a government shutdown by December 11th?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago

    It takes 60 senators to pass (allow a vote on) a controversial budget (written and passed by 50% of house). There's probably 40 who can insist on defunding Iran war, and cancelling coming medicaid cuts. There are hopefully 90 who think Pete Hegseth's lies to congress about costs and defeat of Iran war deserve the most extreme punishment.

    Mr Veto is not going to help GOP in new election cycle. It's end of era in simping for him. First time in history, a VP has said "must change our relationship to Israel" and even President has said to end aid to Israel. Schumer can't be leader fighting that from the right.

    A shutdown until Jan 3 (new congress day) has a high potential, but then passing something more moderate but still above 2 main goals, before to avoid even more dem budget items is possible too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    Ok but I don't think that's going to help their cause. It'll just add to American's troubles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (4 children)

    Wnding sanctions on Iran is too far

    Americans talking like they own the entire world and you have the right to make others suffer to get what you want. Trump really represents you better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (2 children)

    I wish Iran sanctions get lifted and peaceful attitude towards Iran. I literally am more dedicated to this than anyone in US congress.

    In terms of what issue to threaten government shutdown over prior to new congress and soon enough that is practical, full sanctions relief with no negotiated gain, do not make the list.

    Achieving a US popular and politically realist outcome FORCED on Trump ASAP (Dec 11th) can get Republican politicians to accept:

    1. Cutting short a losing war is better than losing for 2 more years.
    2. Oil price relief good for all Americans.
    3. Dysfunctional white house access and domination of Israel first views corrupted decision/strategy for war.
    4. Harming Iranians does not prosper Americans. Only dark evil Israel supremacist fucks, to the last American, thirsts for this.

    This is a long debate for establishment to work through, but to get to a budget that removes sanctions enforcement, and a budget is the only tool with any influence over WH, is going outside of the above winning 4 pressure points.

    Blaming Israel for the war and defeat is something JD Vance and Don Jr. are open to. Letting GOP take this view alone so as not to insult Trump too much is good politics and good for Americans. But a radical liberation shift.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

    But this is not about what is realistic. In the first place, politics is about making your own demands, and then a politician will have to satisfy those and probably meet everyone in the middle. But there is no reason to water down these demands yourself.

    If enough people ask for the unrealistic thing, then it becomes realistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    "opportunity to enact it" is topic of thread. First opportunity is entirely about Dec 11th budget deadline. Goal shouldn't be a shutdown, but a strong position to force avoiding shutdown that gets just a few congressional republican votes to get over majority, with perhaps JD Vance casting tie breaking vote (with dem majority) to pass the budget that ends Iran war.

    OP was about inside baseball, and I posted about the inside baseball. Dec 11th budget is near term power play. It is huge near term political event.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago

    10 more please

  • source