Also upgrade uranium to weapons grade.
post
Wait'll you hear about levers, wedges, incline planes, and screws!
(Websearch simple machines)
Screws are just wandering inclined planes
I think this is the first time I've seen someone make a contraction out of "till."
ITT: OP reinvents the wheel.
For my next trick, I shall reinvent fire
Not to be overly pedantic, but fire is naturally occurring. Humans only invented ways of utilizing it.
I love pedantry. Just to kick it up a notch, I'd like to point out that people are a part of the natural world, therefore our technology is a part of nature. For example farms don't seem natural, but I think most people would agree that ants are natural. Some ant colonies engage in farming, and we accept that as a part of nature.
Simplifying what the others said, humans discovered Fire. But they did invent the campfire, the torch, the cooking fire, the pyre, and a bunch of other "fires" (as tools).
So, the "invention of fire" makes sense just fine, I think
If you are male than you can make some sweet circular motion in the shower as well.

In the shower?
Nah, man. I do that to my wife as a power move when I step out of the shower.
Loituma is a Finnish quartet whose members combine the Finnish vocal tradition with the sounds of the kantele. Loituma were selected Ensemble of the Year at the 1997 Kaustinen Folk Music Festival. Loituma members compose or arrange the tunes by themselves, often using improvisation. Lyrics come from many sources, two main traditional sources are the Kalevala, the national epic of Finland, and the Kanteletar.
Wait till OP discovers the lever.
I will say conservation of angular momentum really feels like a cheat code sometimes. “This thing can’t be tipped because it’s spinning too fast”
An engine lathe is one of the only standalone machine tools that is capable of recreating itself in its entirety.
And not only can it recreate itself, with the correct tooling setup it can recreate itself in a more precise, accurate manner than it itself is built.
Not OP, and I'm not sure how the lathe itself does it. But it shouldn't be surprising that it's possible to create more precise tools from less precise tools. Otherwise it would be impossible for us to ever create tools more precise than our own hands and fingers.
Basically, any moving mechanical system has slop/clearance in it. When operating machine tools this is called "backlash", aka how far you have to turn an adjustment handle before it creates a real change in machine position. Any and all moving mechanical systems will have some non-zero amount of slop.
Skilled operators can compensate and "take out" this backlash so that each cut runs perfectly true. Basically as long as you take a "sloppy" machine and always adjust it to run against the very edge of its "sloppiness" zone, you get high precision... I have used lathes at my old college with probably 0.100" or more of backlash and was still able to turn parts that had less than 0.001" of runout.
And obviously once you get to computer controlled machining centers the backlash compensation can be baked into the program to get perfectly true cuts each time.
can it do that indefinitely?
In terms of precision? Not entirely, there are limits to true mechanical precision that is necessitated by lubrication for moving parts, running fits, and natural vibrations.
When combined with other systems (aka computers) you are able to build shit like ASML microchip lithography machines...
If you use Circular Motion with both fists perpendicular to your chest in a vertical orientation, with both fists maintaining a 180° offset from the other’s circle, you can look like an old-timey boxer
Smoke some herb and get ready for this, all motion is curved, there's no such thing as straight motion. The summation of movement can be said to be linear.
As an old-school Zangief main, I concur.
OP?
Original Poster?
Old People?
...
Overpowered.
This sounds like something a character from Dr. Stone would be amazed about. XD
But yes, I agree.
Theoretically, it's possible to use circular motion to build a train to orbit. Literally, you could have a floating platform suspended above the Earth's surface and a train line running right up to the thing. One could have a stationary ring circling the entire planet that you could ride a train right up to. Hell, with sufficient mastery of circular motion, you could build a structure that allowed you to sail a boat to the Moon.
If you're going to quote orbital mechanics as to why this is impossible, you don't know as much about orbital mechanics as you think you do.
Yeah, but a space elevator is still in the realms of material science, unlike the space rail.
What I'm describing is actually possible with ordinary materials, unlike the space elevator. This is less science fiction than a space elevator. Steel is good enough. Oh, and the throughputs possible for systems like this make a space elevator look like a toy.
I'm referring to concepts like the orbital ring.
You could absolutely build a train to space using such active support methods. And a more fanciful and impractical version is vast water-filled structures that allow one to literally a sail a boat to the Moon. I doubt someone would actually go to the trouble of building such a massive and impractical construct for such a silly purpose. But in principle it is possible.
Any games that allows us to explore that concept? Sounds like the perfect stuff for shenanigans
I do think you need active components to keep it stable. Might also be in the range already, where gravitation itself rips it appart.
I don't think you understand the concept. "Gravitation itself rips it apart?" The whole idea is based on the idea of harnessing gravity and orbital mechanics.
I think i do? But earths gravitational field is a potato, which is why constellation satellites like GPS and Starlink need to adjust now and then. And even if it were a perfect sphere, there's still the moon and the other planets pulling on it. Look at Jupiters Lagrange points for a example how wobbly space around the sun actually is:
L3, L4 and L5 are fields of pebbles (asteroids) Jupiter pushes/pulls around it's orbit by deforming space.
About ripping apart: no matter how high the tensile strength of the material; scale it up enough and it's a sandcastle. Wikipedia has a small table here for the lightest materials and i think Steel is around 100 km. That combined with the potato grav field of earth and it breaks apart.
Ok I'm sorry. Yes, it likely would require some minimal active control to maintain stability. You have a point about perturbations from other bodies. But the Trojan asteroids and Lagrange points have minimal effect. And it's not like the gravitational field around the Sun actually changes that much, percentage wise, unless you're right up close to the planets. The Trojans and Lagrange points are just examples of locations where objects gently placed in certain locations can maintain stability.
Jupiter's Hill Sphere has a radius of 50 million kilometers (actually much smaller than the outer gas giants.) Its orbital radius is more like 780 million km.
Now, this does mean it would be quite difficult to build a Solar System-sized orbital ring right near the orbital path of gas giant, or any other planet. You could build a ring around Jupiter, but building a Solar-centric ring right near Jupiter's orbit would be a problem.
are you saying the large extent of the two Trojan fields shows "wobbliness" of space? because you'd expect all the debris to be right at the exact L4 and L5 points?
if so - no, because a LaGrange point is (despite being massless itself) something a light body can have a stable orbit around. it's not just the only stable point, it allows a large zone for stable orbits.



all 66 comments