top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Considering the website claims it "respects your privacy" but doesn't give you a choice to opt out of cookies for 1,746 partners, the website hardly seems like a good source

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    Regardless if this is true or not I will never buy a “smart” device again. Why does my refrigerator need internet connection to cool my food?!?!

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    It doesn't, they want an internet connection so they can track your food usage and then sell your more food, they want your money forever

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Ughh okay sure I guess my example was “extreme” But the point stands, there are smart appliances out there that literally lock you out of using them without internet connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    The fridge app can use the phone's microphone to find out which compressor frequencies resonate loudly in the room, and avoid them.

    When everyone's phones are away, the fridge can pre-cool and make noise, and then go silent when someone is nearby, according to the motion detector.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Or you could just get an inverter compressor and have a quiet fridge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    My previous LG fridge with an inverter controlled linear compressor was loud. It liked to run the compressor at 60Hz a lot, which fit my concrete apartment badly, so I had loud spots and quieter spots. Sounded like a car was idling outside. The compressor was mounted too rigidly, so the vibration conducted to the frame, making the fridge body work as a loudspeaker diaphragm. The cold air fan was loud too, whooshing. The best feature was soft start from a short stroke, so it sneaked up to full noise over a minute.

    My current similar LG likes to run the compressor at a much lower frequency, producing infrasound, below hearing range. The cold air fan is quieter but still bothersome sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

    The smart part isn't the problem.

    The internet connection is.

    Use smart devices on protocols like Z-Wave or Zigbee, which set up their own separate network. And then prevent the controller from ever reaching the internet so none of the devices can access it. Through things like Mac Blacklisting.

    You will still be able to access everything while on your local network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    Not defending. But it can be used to send notifications when the door is left open or the temp is too high. Same with *washers when they send you notifications when they're done or when there is an issue.

    The problem is that cooperations are gready bastards, instead of using the tech to do just that, they mine it to get more out of their customers.

    Look at cars, a screen is great to show reversing camera and navigation, but the greedy automakers use it to display ads, spy on your habbits, replace physical buttons, ... etc

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (8 children)

    Sounds like a generic botnet along with TVs, app based home cameras, routers and such.


    Anyways, I remember some old story I've read, not idea if true or not, but someone was going over .sh files of a past employer and one of them telneted into a coffee machine (that reportedly nobody else knew had telnet) and made it brew coffee in just the right timing for the person to walk there and put a cup in the machine for coffee to start pouring right away. I guess that's one actually good use for a "smart coffee machine"... Or they could wait. Unless they are paid hourly and the coffee break isn't included, somehow.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

    A more legit use case is checking status. Is the coffee ready?

    While I really don’t want to compliment Samsung, my “smart” range has a config to disable/enable remote operation. I can see when it’s on, what temp it is, when the oven is up to cooking temperature and when the timer goes off, I get notifications but assuming no holes or bugs it cannot be controlled remotely.

    You might ask why they would ever allow “enable” but that’s a different question. They probably feel they have to because the “smart” feature costs way too much money for notifications and statuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    A more legit use case is checking status. Is the coffee ready?

    Isn't that the story of the first webcam?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    assuming no holes or bugs

    Well, that's the problem with IoT devices, isn't it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    The problem is there are easy and well understood ways to prevent that are easier and cheaper, yet manufacturers decide not to use that.

    We have several local-only network protocols for exactly this. For residential use, notably Zigbee, z-wave, or Thread, and all of them have much cheaper radios than WiFi. The key benefit here is local only, no direct internet connection.

    The only problem is you need a hub and historically not everyone is ready to set one up. However now that Apple, Amazon,and Google are building them into their devices, tens (hundreds?) of millions of people are already set on that

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 83 points 1 month ago (23 children)

    The title is a bit dishonest, most of the data didn't leave the local network. According to the article, sending this much data seem to have been a bug instead of intended design.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It’s also based entirely on a tweet with zero follow-up or explanation as to what happened. People have lied on Twitter in the past, shockingly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    Okay, but here me out. Maybe coffee makers shouldn't have a way to generate data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Don't get me wrong, I absolutely think having a coffee maker connected to the internet is completely stupid and useless. I made that comment because I hate dishonesty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    Hard disagree. Built a Gaggimate, can download custom shot profiles and upload shot logs for tasting notes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I admit, I don't drink coffee at all, but this Gaggimate thing look interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (9 children)

    My coffee maker is a pot and heating element in a plastic shell, as it should be. As it was for 60 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    "As it should be" is a strong statement. There are many more ways of making coffee.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    I feel like you’re purposefully taking that statement out of context to imply that I’m against things like the French press. We’re talking about electric coffee makers, and I’m clearly saying that they should have no internet connection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    How can I take it "out of context"? I replied to a single sentence comment and said comment is right there.

    If you're only against the coffee maker having an internet connection (and I agree on that), maybe you should've phrase your comment differently, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 child)

    The context is everything before the comment. “Coffee maker”, in this context, pretty clearly means an automatic drip-brew coffee machine.

    It would be like if we were talking about basketball, and I said, “my net is made of chain, as it should be”, and you were to reply, “how dare you, nylon is a perfectly fine material for fishing nets.”

    The other sentence in my (apparently single sentence) comment, “As it was for 60 years”, should also have maybe been an indicator of what I meant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago

    My bad, it was a single line comment. Quite a pedantic thing to remark, but ok.

    “Coffee maker”, in this context, pretty clearly means an automatic drip-brew coffee machine.

    I don't think anyone is disputing that or confused about it. It's precisely what my response was about.

    It would be like if we were talking about basketball, and I said, “my net is made of chain, as it should be”, and you were to reply, “how dare you, nylon is a perfectly fine material for fishing nets.”

    Awful analogy. The brewing method changes the taste of the cup, a lot. A more adequate comparison would be saying that there's only one way to make pizza. It's not a minor detail. Even the net thing would be a weird thing to say, though.

    Seems like you where the one confused after all. Oh well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    None of the good ones involve a computer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Define computer. Good espresso machines use a PID controller and some have ways to tweak the pressure curve + other features. There are even DIY projects to make your own. I think the part that bothers you is the data collection and internet connection. That is 100% not necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    Haha. As a consultant, I worked on a crapton of IoT projects. Not a single one could explain WHY they needed all that data. If you're just storing user actions, it's not really useful, or actionable.

    I made coffee at 8:03 am on Tuesday, did laundry at 2:39.873 pm on a Saturday, or opened the fridge door at 6pm and closed it at 6:02pm.

    So what.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    So what?

    Well you drink coffee in the morning so it's probable that you go to the bathroom soon after.

    Oh your did laundry on Saturday the weekend? I bet your don't do laundry during the week because work. Maybe you won't be home around then...

    Opened the fridge door at 6:00 pm and it was open for 2 minutes? I bet the person is hungry. Quick flash their marketing ID with ads for fast food!

    Stuff like that is what they use the info for.

    If you wear a smart watch that monitors your heartrate. You bet your ass they know when you have sex and when you need more condoms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 weeks ago

    The more info they have about you, the worse it gets.

    And even if the company just uses your right to privacy just to make money through ads. You can be sure they will get hacked by people with even less morals.

    They can use all that data to open a bank account on your name and commit tons of tax fraud.

    Who do you think they will arrest? That is right, you.

    And getting out of that will always cost you tons of time, effort and money. So good luck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    So.... How do we pronounce IoT? Is it I O T or eye-aught?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    What about people who are doing other things?

    • I’m getting dressed and would like notification when the coffee is ready
    • I’m out doing yard work, but want to be notified when the laundry is done so I can feed the next load

    While I could do one thing at a time, or use a clock or at a timer, getting the notification makes it stress free

    Think of it as equivalent to the dryer buzzer. It used to notify us when the laundry was done so we can start the next load, but apparently we need a more complicated way to do that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Was it using the cloud to analyze the genome of the beans?

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Home grade router counting is notriously inaccurate.

    Keurig machines are best left at the shop. They create mountains of waste.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    10gb downloaded from a coffee machine is absolutely bonkers, surely that would be a story by itself if it werent for the two orders of magnitude greater uploads.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    But what is it uploading?

    I understand the logic behind why a coffee maker can take on orders, although it feels pointless to me - Some might want freshly grounded beans and being able to start that process from bed could safe them a whopping thirty seconds while scrolling the fediverse.

    I guess it could upload a notification, out of beans, screw is loose, shit is malfunctioning. But downloads should be magnitudes larger than downloads, yet in incredibly small payloads in all directions

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    I wonder how much most means? How much is acceptable.

    He found that while the coffee maker had generated 1TB of traffic, most of it stayed within his parents’ home network rather than being sent over the internet.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Someone took the idiom from the 00’s that “you can run linux on your coffee machine” too far.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It was 10GB as far as I remember

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    why is a coffee machine connected to wifi ffs. user error there.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    It's not user error to use a product as designed. Pointlessly designing products to connect to the Internet is corporate error

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I respectfully disagree.

    They didn't have to connect it to wifi.

    Like I don't connect my TV to wifi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, but you are aware of what kind of malice is possible when a device is connected to the internet, most people are not. When a normal person sees "connect your coffee machine to our app so you can start making a coffee when you're still in bed, and it's ready for you by the time you are in the kitchen" it looks like a pretty nice feature, so they look into the reviews of the product.

    Most mainstream review sources will also tout these features as positives, and not even mention being careful about what you connect to the internet, so even the people that normal folks trust to inform them are saying it's safe, so they buy the machine and download the app.

    The app asks for internet permissions to install a firmware update. Every app-connected product ever does this, so they assume it's a safe thing to do, and they update the machine.

    The app, and by extension the coffee machine, now have access to do literally whatever it wants with that internet connection.

    Sure, people in this day and age should be aware of what comes with living in a digital world, but if no one is warning them, why would they know?

    It should be the responsibility of the company selling the device to disclose what the device will do. Every single piece of data it collects should be mentioned in a manual. Every reason for using the internet should be mentioned. If a company sells a device that collects anything not mentioned in the manual, there should be serious consequences, like the inability to sell products in that country moving forward.

    The fact that companies have the ability to have a product do something behind the backs of the consumer is the issue, the issue is not that your average person isn't tech savvy enough to understand that every company and every reviewer is technically lying by omission, and doing so to take advantage of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    Oh, I can tell this community is gonna be funny as hell to look through if this is the first thing I see.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Antivirus updates - it was Microsoft coffeemaker 🤕

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    88 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    33 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    19 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    5 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    4 comments in c/technology@midwest.social view that post