Having Regular English would be nice given some of the silly stuff English has.
Like, really, what's the root of "worse, worst" and "better, best"? "Wo" and "Be"????
Having Regular English would be nice given some of the silly stuff English has.
Like, really, what's the root of "worse, worst" and "better, best"? "Wo" and "Be"????
Mouse -> Mice
Louse -> Lice
House -> Hice
ox - oxen
box - boxen
equinox - equinoxen
xerox - xeroxen
Die - Dice
Pie - Pice
Tie - Tice
Lie - Lice
Moose -> Moose
Cher -> Cher
Check out this sweet moof!
Language is descriptive, so there’s nothing stopping you from using “rooves”, other than what typically results from using words others may not understand. Get enough people over long enough a timeline, and “rooves” becomes the norm, and “roofs” becomes archaic. Just gotta put in the effort.
I can groof to that!
Ew! Perv.
Not really, unless they're booving that groofy moof. Then, they're lost to us, in the land of boxen and meeses.
Dialectic morphology is a mofo.
eg. "w00t" is a word. 🤮
Linguistics is a descriptive science.
Language though is not science, it's a cultural practice. Adhering to a specific set of rules to signal belonging to a specific cultural subgroup is perfectly normal; and deviation from those rules is not a socially neutral act. When and how you deviate signals a lot of things about you and what you're saying.
That's why slang is fascinating. It always tells a story. Whether it's English Prep School jargon that breached containment, whitewashed AAVL, group in-jokes, unconventional emojis, etc., a slang word says a lot about the person who uses it.
That is to say, if you unironically start saying "rooves", I can't say whether you'll start a trend that will ultimately change English forever (weirder things have happened). But I can assure you that the immediate effect will be that people will label you "tumblr weirdo". Which would be a correct assessment, so that's effective subtextual communication. Yay linguistics!
I think I've been saying rooves my whole life. I don't think I'd generally write it that way, but it feels more natural to say.
If I have, I'm not sure anyone's noticed. My speech patterns are odd though, so it might not be terribly noticable. It's also possible I've never had to say the word. It's not common that you need to pluralize roof.
My personal one of these is just saying "I'll" as a response to questions like "Will you ...?" or "Who will ...?".
If it's a contraction of "I will", it should work, but somehow it sounds weird, like it disrupts the expected pattern of emphasis.
rooves and roofs are both accepted as correct though? Roofs being the standard is a pretty new thing, and not the more common one everywhere
I haven't once seen 'rooves' used, let alone be considered as correct.
Wiktionary says it changed in the 17th century, so depending on your definition of "new", sure. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/roofs
It doesn't sound weird to me personally, although it does look weird when written out.
Because the English language is known for its rigid consistency of pluralization.
They're on the roof, they've found the groof
Okay, but think about this: Groofy.
As soon as I typed that, I changed my mind. No longer defending groof.
the plural of roof should be roof. fite me
I propose we use roofies! It sounds cute and probably isn't taken already.
all 48 comments