all 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 75 points 1 month ago (17 children)

The best European invention was the Suez canal, preventing people from realising that Africa is also the same landmass.

I propose we dig a similar canal from the north of Russia to the Black sea to unambiguously become a continent. Some would argue Caspian sea is more appropriate, but come on: Connecting the Black sea to the White sea? That's poetic.

This plan would cost trillions, benefit no one and have devastating consequences for millions of people. I will not be answering questions.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Europe and Asia are the same continental mass but Africa is not. Africa is moving independent to the Eurasian continent and is even slowly producing a new continent at the horn of Africa. So yes, it's true that Europe and Asia are the same continent but Africa is not. It is also slowly moving into Europe. That's why the Alps exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Behold, the 16 continents:

    From Wikipedia.
    You are of course free to define continent how you want, but I am free to prefer Afroeurasia over a North America that includes parts of Siberia and half of Japan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm happy to include Japan in North America. Sad to lose parts of California, but it feels fair, especially since we get to keep cuba.

    Also this is leaving me wondering about arctic earthquakes…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Asia was named such by the Europeans, meaning something like 'the land of the sunrise' and thus referencing its Eastern position relative to Europe.

    Etymonline cites a possible Akkadian origin for 'europe' meaning 'to go down, set', which would mirror the origin for the word 'asia'.

    In other words, Europe and Asia might literally mean 'the western and eastern bit,' making perfect sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Thus reaulting in Eurasia being the setting and rising land, which is fitting because the sun certainly does do both things there from what I hear (I've only been to North America according to the tectonicists in this thread)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    c. 1300, from Latin Asia, from Greek Asia, speculated to be from Akkadian asu "to go out, to rise," in reference to the sun, thus "the land of the sunrise." Used by the early Greeks of what later was known as Asia Minor; by Pliny of the whole continent.

    https://www.etymonline.com/word/Asia

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    whereas europe means .. wide face xd

    Often explained as "broad face," from eurys "wide" (see eury-) + ops "face," literally "eye" (from PIE root *okw- "to see"). But also traditionally linked with Europa, Phoenician princess in Greek mythology. Klein (citing Heinrich Lewy) suggests a possible Semitic origin in Akkad. erebu "to go down, set" (in reference to the sun) which would parallel occident. Another suggestion along those lines is Phoenician 'ereb "evening," hence "west."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yeah its called Eurasia. Some Russians are quite fans of this kind of thinking.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    As a Russian, I'm always bewildered why everyone else seems to refer to Europe and Asia as separate continents. Like, y'all blind or something? Look at the map!

    And if you think it's about geology or something, nuh-uh. It's just a random convention coming from ancient perceptions, and it is heavily wrong. Eurasia is a single continent, and always has been.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Basically the idea was that the mountains caused Europe to develop mostly separately from Asia.

    Tbh I always thought it was silly too. Continents have always been more vibes based than anything and unless we're reverse engineering Victorian race science I don't think there's a compelling argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    As a European, yeah, this does make more sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    hehe suddenly Italy and Spain are "the nordics"

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    Europe is actually more a collection of large islands that have temporarily decided to exist as a unified land mass because Africa and Asia are squeezing it from both sides (geologically speaking)

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (11 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Europe is just a part of the Eurasian continent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Continent is an arbitrary division not consistently backed by any actual geological features.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Only because europe insists on this tomfoolery

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    So you think that Hokkaido is in North America and Somalia isn't in Africa?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I'd appreciate if you could answer the question. Do you perhaps have another geologic feature to propose? If you want to use large landmasses, then islands don't belong to any continents at all. If you don't set a minimum size, then there are far too many continents to remember. So what is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Do you perhaps have another geologic feature to propose? If you want to use large landmasses, then islands don't belong to any continents at all.

    Isn't proximity a good argument? This is exact kind of tomfoolery he's talking about.

    He called out your arbitrary bs and now you go on a dense stupid defense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    So islands belong to the nearest large landmass? I guess you could do that, but then where's the threshold? Obviously, Africeurasia has to be a continent if you want there to be any continents, and America probably is too, but then is Australia a continent that includes NZ and some other islands, or is it part of Africeurasia? How about Greenland? Are the Diomede Islands really on two different continents? Indonesia would be too, if you count Australia as a continent.

    I'll give you that that's geologically consistent while being culturally independent, but it's pretty inconvenient.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Australia is the minimum size. Isthmuses, oceans and seas are separators. Islands don't belong to any continent. What do you think?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    That's a solid start, but what's your threshold for an isthmus? Does Panama count, or is there only one American continent? Same question for the Sinai.

    And if they don't count, Australia's inclusion seems a bit arbitrary, given the massive size difference between it and the next-largest landmass (the Americas are nearly 6x the size).

    Furthermore, if isthmuses count, why not mountain ranges? The Urals and Himalayas have historically been at least as important as barriers as any body of water small enough to have a land bridge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    Why? Coz it looks pretty. You can totally come up with your own axioms.

    Panama and Sinai count as isthmuses for borders. Australia I like to count coz its 3x larger than greenland.

    Edit: also next largest is Antarctica, about 2x.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    plus

    far west Asia: Africa

    south south east Asia: Austrailia

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    "Europe? More like Europartofmenow!"

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    I fail to see why it should be asia centric.

    Surely it makes more sense to call it Eastern Europe, Far Eastern Europe, Far Eastern Europe And A Bit North... :-)

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    There would be a lot of wars over who was northwest and who was west

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    This makes me think of that old Doctor Who episode where they're in Pompeii, and anytime the Doctor or companion uses a Latin phrase, the locals get agitated and say things like "Hey! ME. NO. SPEAKIE. THE. CELTIC!"

    Cute little quirk with the handwavey translation thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Can be fixed w "northwest" and "southwest"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    my thought is that tere are places in the middle that noone want's to lay claim to. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The continent of Africa is connected, count it in.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    India does call the Middle East as West Asia.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The name "Eurasia" exists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Iirc we have the ancient greeks to thank for the current distinction. They named Europe the region north of greece, and Asia the region east of Anatolia, and then eventually decided that their actual boundary should be the middle of the black sea

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I thought the boundary was generally agreed upon as the Ural and Caucasus Mountains?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    That would be eventually. Back then, Europe and Asia weren't continents, they were names of undetermined regions that were north or east of them respectively.

    I don't know when or who decided "you know what? This whole region? It's a continent, and let's call it Europe" (maybe the Romans? Or even the Greeks?).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Eurasia, with the European, Indian, Arabian, and Scandinavian Great Peninsulas

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    There are seven continents.

    Eurasia, Africa, America, Antarctica, Australia, Greenland and Zealandia.

    Change my mind.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This is unironically true. You can call it Eurasia if you're feeling charitable to the pale demons.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Why can’t Middle East be middle Asia And Central Asia as is?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    s/

    Disgusting Kazhaqstan-centric world view. smh

    How dare you?! Obviously [other point on sphere] is the superior point of reference.

    /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Sure, but aren't continents defined by tectonic plates and not landmass?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    Not really, and even if it did it wouldn't separate europe from asia, but it would put Japan and part of Siberia in North America, cut Africa in two, cut India and Arabia out of Asia, and trim off bits of both Americas in California, Central America, and Venezuela.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Europe is politically a continent bounded by Urals? What is southern boundary? Is a mountain range a legitimate geological continental boundary?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The Southern boundary is the Mediterranean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    We're all in Greater Gobekli Tepe, technically. The Gobekli Tepe Metropolitan Area/suburbs.

  • source