Basically just the CPU fan, case, and PSU (if you're lucky). If someone can figure out how to get Doom running on just those 3 things, young people will be able to ascend.

all 82 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Noctua was expensive from the start already 😁

Fantastic fans though.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I mean many modern cases have circuitry in them, such as RGB controllers or PWM fan hubs.

    Let me remind you the requirements for DOOM modders to get DOOM running:

    • Circuitry (optional)
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    I vaguely remember reading that they have literal ARM cortex chips in some of the most modern case RGB controllers

    If we can get to an SPI and connect some kind of display, it's conceivable that we could run DOOM, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I feel like the military intelligence industry community conspired to introduce RGB components so that windowed PC cases would become industry standard, thus making it easier for them to power up any PC that is connected to a power source via BIOS bypassing line of sight technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Cases are a bargain these days because no one has a use for them

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Noctua was never cheap. They are gloriously overbuilt in a world of rifle bearing, built-to-fail bullshit at end of warranty schlock. Pay now or pay later.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago

    I've had my Noctua CPU fan for more than 15 years, never made a squeak or a noise. And I still get free upgrade kits from them to accommodate for new CPU platforms. Just have to send them a request. So I'd pay the price anytime.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yeah because I could never afford a Noctua fan in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    They're also close to buyitforlife territory. Mine is >15 years old (1st gen i5!). The AM4 mount would've been free if I had the original receipt. But alas, I had to fork out $10 cause I was too dumb to have taken a photo of it back then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    All but the cheapest fans these days are buyitforlife material. The only thing really gonna fuck up a modern fan is epic amounts of dust binding up the ball bearings. And many fans these days use a newer magnetic type system where there isn't even any physical contact being made to wear anything down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I've been using Arctic fans. Are Noctua fans super amazing in comparison?

    I built a CR Box fan too using 5 Arc Fans, but seen builds with Noctua fans to make it super silent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I also use Arctic fans, and they're by far the quietest, best-performing fans I've ever used. Equivalent Noctua fans are like 4-8 times more expensive, so unless they can also give handies or something, I can't imagine them actually being worth the price.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    Maybe thats because anything from Noctua has always had stupidly high prices.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Yeah this, there's cpu coolers for half the price that cool better now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

    You may know this already. The reason Noctua fans are so much quieter is because they spin more slowly and blow less air, so even low priced, entry level fans are more effective. They literally sell a lower performing, if well engineered, fan for a premium price mostly because of hype and brand recognition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    They spin what they are ordered to do by the PWM?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago* (12 children)

    Tell me you don't understand how PWM works without telling me you don't understand how PWM works.

    I'm an electrical engineer so I'm really looking forward to the responses to this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

    That's why there is a "?" and not a "." or "!". Because I wasnt sure and that's what I thought to understand it as.
    No need to be a dick though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Don't be sorry because you're not wrong and dude was just being a dick for no reason. Also a PWM signal is not a complex concept and it certainly doesn't require any degree at all to understand.

    Simply put: you have an additional pin carrying the PWM signal, which is a simple squarewave. How much of that wave is high during a period is called the duty cycle and regulates the fan speed. Eg. if for 75% of the period the signal is high, then the duty cycle is 75%.

    So, while the phrase "they spin what they are ordered to do by the PWM" is not particularly well worded, it's also technically not wrong.

    I really wish people would share their knowledge, instead of gatekeeping it to feel superior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Ty :)

    So the fan decides the max RPM possible and the fan controller (probably the Motherboard) decides the percentage of the available RPM with the duty cycle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Pretty much. In a typical motherboard, the fan controller is linked to temperature monitoring and the duty cycle is changed in correlation with another variable, generally CPU temperature. The PWM control method actually doesn't require the monitoring of fan speed at all, but it's included for informational and safety purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The username was a bit of a giveaway.

    Their claim about Noctua is also not correct, or at least not generalisable to all coolers. I upgraded my CPU recently to a Ryzen 9 5950X, so needed to upgrade my cooler. The NH-D15 came out as one of the best options (that were also available second hand) when looking at cooling performance per dB. That ratio is what matters.

    I ended up spending about $45. It ended up not having all fan clips with it, but Noctua sent those to me for free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If you're going to infer someone is stupid because you disagree with them, at least have the decency to explain how they're wrong.

    BTW, the username is 100% bait: a certain fraction of social media users tend to make that "hurr hurr, username sure checks out" comment, letting me know the person making said comment likely isn't worth taking seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It was a joke I assumed you'd be okay with given your username, which signalled an appreciation of self deprecating humor :)

    To be frank, I didn't think you were friendly enough in previous comment that I wanted to engage with you, but I had something useful to say. So I referred to your username as hook for the other discussion. I think the person I responded to did a good job explaining why the PWM comment was technically correct, so I had nothing to add to that.

    But other than the comment you made I thought could have been friendlier, I have nothing against you. I'm not making any inferences about you as a person based on one comment. I dont actually you're stupid, you're still the stranger on the internet you were before.

  • source
  • parent
  • I wasn't being a dick for no reason - I was being a dick because I thought THEY were being a passive aggressive dick, much like how you assumed I was "gatekeeping knowledge to feel superior". Bad assumptions all around here.

    I assumed they were suggesting PWM will cause an inherently slower spinning fan to spin at any RPM regardless of model, which is actually a response some Noctua diehards have used in the past when I point out what Noctua is omitting when they advertise their fans as being so much quieter.

    Regardless, I apologized for my bad assumption and subsequent response. It was out of line, especially given the actual meaning and intent of the comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So sorry! I mistakenly assumed you were amongst the "downvoting for sharing information they don't like" crowd that hit my original comment, so I read your comment as being passive aggressive. My response wasn't any better than what I assumed BUT mine was entirely intentionally, so I was absolutely the one in the wrong. I apologize.

    I assumed your response meant "PWM will spin up the fan to equal RPMs regardless of model", which is actually pretty similar to what some Nortua diehards have claimed on Reddit when I've criticized Noctua fans in the past.

    The other commenter has the right of how PWM works. Since it only modulates the frequency and therefore duration of on/off cycles, if one fan spins at a max of 6000 RPM while a Noctua equivalent tops out at 4500, PWM will only be able to modulate to speeds below that maximum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    You were downvoted because you're wrong, or at best technically accurate but inaccurate about the results.

    Your fan speed is set by your fan controller.

    And while it's true that different fans can be set up to spin at different speeds with the same input voltage or PWM signal, if the fan is less effective at cooling at that rate, the controller will end up higher on the fan curve and speed it up to compensate.

    The only things that determine your fan's ultimate speed are a) how high the controller allows it to go, b) how much heat the hardware is generating, and c) how efficiently the combination of coolers and fans dissipate that heat into the air (which also depends on the room's conditions).

    Now we're just talking about fans, so we can ignore item b entirely as well as the cooler and room conditions. And it then comes down to, can the fan keep up with the heat being generated at the current point in the fan's curve? If not, heat increases and the controller speeds up the fan. Then, when it hits whatever the cap is, if it still can't keep up, the hardware either overheats or throttles.

    If it can keep up, then it stays where it is on the curve. If it can dissipate more heat than is being produced, it goes down on the curve and the fan slows down as the temperature lowers.

    All this to say, if you have fan A that needs to be at 2000 rpm to keep up with the heat being generated by the hardware at say 65°C and someone says they have a better fan, B, that is just set to spin slower at the same signal from the controller, all that will happen is it will fail to keep up with the heat generated at 65, then the heat will rise until it's spinning at 2000 rpm anyways or the curve hits the cap and the system throttles to reduce the heat generated.

    So we couldn't really eliminate that item b above and it could actually be relevant, though if that were the case, I'd assume people would just curse noctura because their fans suck and their systems run hotter or slower. But they have a good reputation where the main complaint I see is about their price, not their performance.

    Personally, I use be quiet! fans rather than noctura, but it's a similar principle. They make quieter fans by tweaking or redesigning blades shape and angle, bearings, and the motor. Blades make them more effective at slower speeds, and all three can make them quieter at the same speeds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I disagree about why I got downvoted, but I don't care enough to argue the point.

    You're correct about the temperature/duty cycle curve, but not "the only things that determine maximum fan speed" and what that means in relation to that curve. I'm loath to toot my own horn, but the concepts you're describing and are claiming I don't understand are what I work in professionally. I mentioned earlier I'm an EE - an electrical engineer.

    Maximum fan speed is inherent to the fan itself and, put very simplistically, in a brushless DC motor is determined by the torque generated. As the motor spins faster, the total resistance (again simplistically, back EMF and net friction) increases, and once it equals the motor's torque output, the motor has reached its maximum speed. Fans operating at a given voltage will have different maximum speeds based on blade size and geometry and motor design.

    PWM fan controllers simply correlate a temperature with a duty cycle percentage, but cannot cause a fan to spin faster than its maximum speed. If one fan is rated for 3500 RPM and another 6000 RPM, they will spin at their respective rating at 100% duty cycle. No more.

    Noctua's fans in general tend to have engineering superior to many lower priced alternatives, somewhat reducing the sound generated at a given speed, but the low-noise line of fans for which they are often noted achieves that low noise primarily through reduced speed, and thus reduced output. Similarly, the low noise adapter included with some fans is simply an in-line resistor, also reducing speed for reduced sound.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    My main point though is that it isn't the electronics or the fan's max speed that are the critical parts, it's whether the fan is able to dissipate the heat being generated with the total sum of how everything is set up. If it can't, then temperature creeps up until that max speed is hit (thus it can't dissipate anymore and throttles, hits equilibrium at a higher temperature (because bigger temperature differential means more heat transfer even at the same fan speed, so it's possible it won't just run away when the max speed is hit), or melts/overheats to failure) or until the fan speeds up and is able to find an equilibrium or reduce the temperature.

    Thus whatever tricks they use need to result in fans that are still good enough to replace whatever fan they are replacing or they will cause performance issues.

    Though if someone is just adding case fans, then as long as it doesn't disrupt the airflow, it will help even if it isn't very good, and you can use multiple quiet fans to replace a single loud one and see an overall improvement even if the individual fans aren't nearly as good as the single one they replace. So based on that, I'll back down from my previous "their reputation speaks for itself" because the reality is that they can be overpriced underperforming garbage but still get a good reputation because they aren't just being evaluated via a/b testing and I was naive to oversimplify it like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Well....sure but there's people who reviee coolers with a decibel reader so they can equalize noise level when testing.

    Imo though air cooling is still louder than water cooling. I have both and while i appreciate thaf air colling is great too today and probably peace of mind, but a nice rgb liquid aio is also not expensive these days....specially compared to what the other PC parts cost now...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    hell yeah. got myself a new case, psu and a shitload of fans to prepare for my future graphics card upgrade. when the prices drop. a few years after the bubble pops.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago
    [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    It's the only thing keeping me cool.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    This, but seriously. Many PC components companies are overstocking and already have decrease their production to match demand.

    This is the moment to buy those tiny/cool/silent upgrades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I just had to buy a replacement 9800X3D yesterday because the previous one from early 2025 fried Saturday night. I paid $10 less for the new one, was very surprising. This post caught my attention because I had to remove and reinstall my Noctua cooler.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Noctua coolers are already pretty expensive and not the pinnacle of cooling tech any more. If they went up in price, I think people would just go with a different brand. Like Thermalright, which "borrows" from Noctua's designs but are a fraction of the cost. You can even get them in that ugly brown and off white color scheme.

    Getting Doom to run on just 3 coolers would be pretty awesome, tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    i mean, lets face it.

    Unless you are overclocking, a Hyper212 will do almost the same same job, for 20-30 dollars, that a 120-190 dollar Noctua HSF will do. and the couple of degrees of difference you might have sure as fuck aint worth the 6x price increase.

    and lets be real, if you are overclocking..why keep it always on? the CPU probably already boosts to those overclocked speeds under load anyway, so why add the extra stress and shortened life?

    20 years ago I would understand why. 20 years ago I overclocked as well, because you got actual, legitimately, daily use improvement out of it.. But with modern CPUs auto-overclocking themselves with boost (And it being under warranty to boot), I just don't see the point anymore for everyday use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    these are the components that people cheap out on but give the most bang for the buck when you increase quality.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Also peripherals like DACs, monitors and such.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Isnt that a Noctua cooler pictured?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    At this point I'm expecting doom to run on ball on string attached to cup

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Bought a new pc today. It’s just a case packed with fans but it looks TIGHT.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Don't jinx it! /s

    Also, I'll jump on the Noctua fan train, love their stuff. I also recommend Be Quiet fans.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    i bought it when the falcon guide told me to in 2012, thought it didn't work, bought another, got BOTH to work, and my setups have been cool ever since.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I can still buy AT era motherboard studs for the same price?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Shut the fuck up you little fuck. They’re gonna be upping the price to $90/ fan blade and also firing all the people who make the damn blades if this gets out.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Is there a reason asides from branding that Noctua makes all of there gear in prune binge shit peuce? I'm not an RGB gamer boy, but I would love it if they had some options in black or charcoal.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Meanwhile, people have bought up the remaining optical disk drives, making them more expensive.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Have CPUs or motherboards gone up much? At that point you just lack RAM. Can you boot an OS with just CPU cache?

    Also if you want Doom, just about any second hand machine will be fine.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Peripherals are dirt cheap now. I remember when I built my first pc and watercooling would cost as much as the CPU and the case as much as the psu (and that was just a basic metal box, before windows became standard)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Been using my same hyper 212 from my old i5-750, now it's on my i5-8600k. Love it, makes a significant difference.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Too bad Doom:TDA is locked behind having specific graphics hardware :(

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Okay this will probably sound dumb, but has anyone ever tried to use this in tandem with a liquid cooling system?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Putting one of these on top of the liquid cooling block on a CPU, I live in a fairly hot area and thought it was a fun idea. Kind of like that guy that made his AC system cool his computer lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    No idea what he’s on about, but now I’m imagining a loop running to like four NHD-15’s bolted to the top of a case. Like using those with waterblocks mounted to them instead of normal radiators.

    Why? Fuck if I know, but it’d be funny

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    All the hassle and risk of running a complicated custom loop plus all the noise of a fan based cooler?! Sign me up!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I don’t think it would really be any louder than a normal water cooling setup, since you need fans on your radiators anyway. It would just be hideously inefficient compared to radiators, so higher temps. It would be adding like at least 4 thermal transfer boundaries, and heat pipes don’t really work until they get to their operating temperature. So best case scenario, it would probably run a couple degrees warmer than just regular air cooling.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Noctua sent me new mounts for my 11 year old CPU cooler for free so I could put it in my upgraded desktop.

    Real MVPs there.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The top of the market sucks but I've been building am4 systems for people for about 400$. 3700x or 5500 is good enough for most people and as long as they don't break their motherboard they can drop in an upgrade.

    My fastest pc right now is probably my 5700x3d and 4070 super. So I feel like I have 2 years to find an upgrade.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    PC hardware got more expensive (as well as everything else) only in terms of fiat notes. If you measure it in hard assets like monero, ₿ or gold it keeps getting cheaper.

  • source