[–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

I'm sorry to say this to you. It wasn't difficult to make a voting machine in 2011. What we have are fraud machines. It's just politically impossible to make a secure voting machine, even though it's technically trivial.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    They singlehandedly exploded the anti-feminist movement in 2010, mostly because YouTube monetisation was more lucrative back then. I do not really blame them, it's a very "they know not what they do" situation, but it led to gamergate and eventually trump but a lot of things led to those. learning that you can't trust God went hand-in-hand with 'idiot women love astrology and crystals' and i don't think they predicted how much better their anti women stuff would do compared to the 2009 debating creationists content. Nonetheless I do crave accountability from new atheists, they need to stop rebelling from their Christian upbringing and instead either contextualise or uproot it.

    Atheists now, they seem all right. Most of them my age seem pretty mature.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    God this is such a clarifying take. The meme is just 'voting is the most important thing you can do' when it was always narratively a free lottery ticket and now kind of actually resembles a free lottery ticket in other ways. would you buy a free lottery ticket? i would.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    there is no comparison between software and services, though. self-hosting deepseek might be, subjectively, the wrong choice for your lab, but chatgpt is wrong for everyone, every human and every animal and plant too

    this is coming from a k2 7b user btw. it's good enough for me!

    edit: i replied to the wrong fucking comment and I'm too angry to fix it

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    no. I'm in netsec, they aren't shutting down your local model with secret code. deepseek is a lot safer then Claude, grok, and chatgpt because you don't need Internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    i have been following Chinese models for about two years now because they are open-weight and qwen is fun to run on my kubernetes cluster, the news about this Apache licensed model complete with a recipe to make it again with potentially different ingredients is making we want to abandon them for something more ideologically sound and way more interesting

    this new model, couldn't universities rebuild it with different contexts and study it in ways you can't reproduce in other models? like, is k2 horizons a good scientific foundation on which to study machine learning?

    or am i just lacking way too much context and falling for hype?

     

    0: Ronald Reagan 1986

    1: Drugs are literally addictive and they don't have any money

    2: There's not much else to do when you don't have your own space

    3: It is less demoralizing than trying to offer hungry homeless people food and seeing them immediately lose interest

    That person asking you for money probably wants drugs. They probably are too distracted to have an actual conversation with you because it has been too long since their last hit. If you have an acquaintance relationship with this person, a protracted conversation should be considered rude because you are preventing their acquisition of change and dollars for drugs. You don't have to take it as an indictment on their character and you can still give them money!

    Furthermore I do not think this take is racist when Black homeless people ask you for money. You're still homeless, there's still not shit to do on these streets, you are asking me for money, I know you are trying to get some drugs.

    edit: hell yeah i won. i have allocated $40 to central Lexington, Winchester road crack guys to celebrate

    view more: next ›