top 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

It's scary and yet many people refuse to believe in climate change. I've had argument with a denier on social media. I can tell that the person is not being deliberately malicious, because he did let up on some points, but he's the type to kick the can down the road and hopelessly hoping to deal with the problem later on. I think a lot of people who handwaves the seriousness of climate change prefer to look the other way. I know far too many people who are like this even if it's not about climate change.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago

    I've been the weird environmentally conscious kid for more than 30 years. People's attitudes haven't changed. The arguments haven't changed. You'll still find people who immediately get excited about global warming, because they like warm weather.

    Some people are just astonishingly stupid, and yet, they walk around and talk and have jobs and can appear to be normal. That's because they are normal. It is normal to be stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago*

    I know scientifically minded people who view it both as 'hysteria,' and for what remains, something that geoengineering can solve in the future.

    In other words, look up the WSJ article advocating for fossil fuel production maximization as a net economic optimization in the long term, basically 'better to maximize efficiency and minimize suffering now, to better geoengineer solutions in the future.'

    ...I read geoengineering papers. They are horrific. As in "our state-of-the-art-solution would... pour acid rain over the ice caps. And it's still economically unfeasible, but less unfeasible. And maybe it will blunt things some?"

    I'm offended such arguments are being presented.

    But I can see right where those opinions come from, as with every twist of climate change denialism.


    The environmental conspiracists are right. It really is Big Oil and such groups, from what I can see.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Here they claim it as a "natural process". Good ol denial

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It is a natural process as humans are natural.

    And we are releasing natural stuff that is accelerating the change of the climate.

    It’s much easier to pretend humans aren’t impacting it if people are allowed paint humans actions as outside nature. We are a huge part of nature, there’s 6 billion of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    it reminds me of this quote from game of thrones, is not the same thing, but it gives the same vibe about the scope of people's thinking and worries: "The common people pray for rain, healthy children, and a summer that never ends. It is no matter to them if the high lords play their game of thrones, so long as they are left in peace. They never are."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago* (10 children)

    Holy fuck. So this is the start of Super El Nino. I'm gonna call it, "winter that wasn't".

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I already didn't get a winter last year. It was 60°F almost the entire time 🫠

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Canadian here. Haven't turned on heating in a year and a half at least. Sitting beside an open sliding glass door and currently considering turning on a fan. It's almost 9pm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The Winter of 2000 was also like this. We were working on our cars with t-shirts, in Minnesota, and it was 42-50(something) a lot of the winter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    But that was abnormal. When I was a kid in PA there would be snow by Halloween, and come december you expected snow to stay until march. There were occasional exceptions, like 60 degrees in februrary, or 100 something in mid summer, but those were like once a decade events. Now we barely have snow that lasts more than like a couple weeks before it gets warm enough to melt everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    My parents keep saying "it's always been like this here"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Funny. My parents say the same thing. "This is just fear mongering. We had warm Autumns in my childhood."

    Then I go look into the actual data of what their warmest years were and it's nowhere near what we're experiencing these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    You don't even need to go into "actual data" which can be hand waved away as conspiracy by Big Whatevs. Find pictures of the past. Halloween photos, back to school pictures, stuff like that.

    Thats been startling here even over 10 years. Last year I was in my shorts and a thin hoodie feeling warm. My phone popped up "memories from 10 years ago" and it was us at the same event in big coats looking cold and miserable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    The Trump administration officially eliminated the 2009 EPA "endangerment finding," stripping the federal government of its legal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.The administration rolled back regulatory requirements for automakers, loosening curbs on gasoline-powered vehicle pollution. Trump has heavily promoted a "drill, baby, drill" energy agenda, easing limits on industrial pollutants and attempting to keep aging fossil-fuel infrastructure online. He routinely mocks climate science on social media, frequently pointing to severe winter weather or downward revisions in worst-case climate projections as supposed evidence against global heating.The most uneducated buffoon in history stands at a podium, bloated with self-importance, lips pursed like a carnival barker ready to sell turd milk to the unsuspecting. He grins a grotesque smirk stretched across his face as he scrawls his name onto a hollow decree, a sham celebration of the dismantling of knowledge itself. The Department of Education falls, not with a bang, but with wheezing verbs, suffocated under the weight of his own staggering ignorance. Surrounding him are the usual suspects: cowards in expensive suits, servile sycophants clapping like trained seals, and racist opportunistic ghouls picking clean the bones of democracy. Liars, fools, and thieves all parasites fattening themselves on the hardships of the many. They stand in rigid formation, dead-eyed and soulless, their allegiance sworn not to country, not to principle, but to power, and the dark, festering rot that clings to it. And there he is the convicted wrong, the living embodiment of septic tank spew, his voice a noxious fog of grift and grievance. He lectures the world on right and wrong, irony clawing at the walls, desperate to escape the grotesque theatre of his moral void. The stomach turns, the air curdles, and for a moment, history itself recoils watching, in horror, as the great American experiment teeters on the precipice, led by a man who couldn't spell "precipice" if his life depended on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't hate 'Muricans (with about a 60% notable exception for those who voted orange, or sat idly by)

    But I HATE 'Murica

    It has always been a shitty, cruel, vulgar place

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago
    [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    you guys are seriously gonna throw g-maw under the bus before you adopt systemic criticisms 🫩

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Gramma's walker probably runs on coal for no goddamn reason

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 58 points 1 month ago (21 children)

    No war but the class war.

    You're just working for the billionaires when you post divisive nonsense like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    True, but it is hard to ignore that the a certain class seems to be centralized/condensed to one generation specifically. And that generation also consistently and energetically supports them to the day they die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    I don't think members of Green Peace switched to supporting it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    Hello there.

    Members of Green Peace protested the use of seal fur and meat, the act of "seal clubbing" and the sale of seal products. This was one of the main sustainable economies in the North. As a result, the communities living there were forced to engage in oil drilling and seismic testing in order to earn money. Still, the fact that seal products are no longer profitable have plunged these indigenous and rural populations into poverty.

    The moral of this story is when you see some sort of big moral outrage about something, whether the moral outrage is coming form the left, right, or middle, whether it's "save the animals," "save the children," "save religion," whatever, you need to do some sort of basic, casual research into what type of bandwagon you're thoughtlessly jumping on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They also spread a lot of FUD about nuclear energy during a time when it would have made a significant difference in slowing climate change

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago

    Maybe if nuclear power plants didn't meltdown sometimes and render dozens of square miles uninhabitable to human life by scales measured in geologic time then Greenpeace would support them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Not sure of the relevance to my argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Members of Green Peace supported, and still support, global warming, even though they don't know that's what they're doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    From your story the communities were the ones supporting it. Maybe Green Peace just wanted them to die out?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Fuck you man

    Fucking lol.
    That'll learn'em.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    It's the only thing I could think of in response to a pro-genocide comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    But he didn't say a pro-genocide comment. He pointed out the Inuit communities are supporting fossil fuel jobs, according to your own story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Eat shit and die you anal licking douchebag. Did you or did you not say Inuit communities are supporting fossil fuel jobs? How the hell is pointing that out "a pro-genocide" comment?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    No that isn't what I said. Just fuck off man. You can't be spoken to and didn't come here to talk to anybody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Hey you're the one telling people to fuck off because you can't handle that your own freakin' story isn't as cut and dry as you think. How about you come back when you figure out what the fuck you're talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    People over 55 own 73% of the US, heavily outweighing billionaires. Boomers alone outweigh billionaires assets by nearly 10x. Any time you see BlackRock, Vanguard, etc as major shareholders of a company, that means it's mostly boomers' 401ks and pension funds. Billionaires themselves are mostly old so really they're just the top of the iceberg of a much larger problem.

    Gen X might be the last generation to retire in the US, for millennials it's starting to look unlikely. There just aren't enough people to exploit anymore. Ideally everyone should have 3 kids, but as an interim solution you can start importing workers from 3rd world countries.

    Other western countries may not have it as bad with the imbalance, but most are growing worse over time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago* (15 children)

    No it isn't. It's a complex issue with enough blame to spread around. Most of the fault lies with the fossil fuel companies that covered up climate change, lied for decades and bought the politicians.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (13 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (12 children)

    If you can vote for politician A and politician B, and both of them are bought by the fossil fuel companies, to what extent are you to blame?

    And if citizens can be held accountable for the actions and choices that their goverment has made, even if they have no real say in them, and that government has committed war crime after war crime abroad, killing literal millions, does that mean citizens are a legitimate target for retaliatory attacks? Was the Dresden firebombing justified? Was 9/11 justified? Were the atomic bombs dropped on Japan justified?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Your options are much greater than voting for politician A or politician B

    Dont let your political program be handed down to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    I was responding to

    Tbf they voted for them

    hence my focus on voting, because that's what he was talking about. But also your broader comment is not a good argument for ageism. Plenty of members of the boomer generation exercised other political options than voting. They were not successful, but many of them did try. At any rate, blaming an entire generation for policy failures is about as valid as blaming Trump's policy failures on folks who voted for Harris.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Sure, but I dont think they as a generation did nearly enough regarding climate change specifically.

    And as far as voting goes, they pretty regularly made up the core voter base of administrations which denied or ignored climate change

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Have you considered directing your ire at the folks who've bought our politicians to advocate for pro-fossil fuel policies, and the folks who bought our media to popularize pro-fossil fuel positions instead of at their victims?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Democrats have a better record on climate change than Republicans do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I figured people could extrapolate, but here goes for your benefit:

    If you can vote for politicians P1 through PN where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1, and all of them are bought by the fossil fuel companies, to what extent are you to blame?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    "Honey, but all I did was work for Denny's"

    "Time for your MAID appointment grandma"

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›