all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Christ it'd be funny if it wasn't so stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Quick someone release LLM 8.5 and get ahead of everyone

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    Warhammer being the most popular scifi fantasy franchise not without reason.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    This is why Atari's consoles are still the most advanced consoles to date.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    “How to lie with statistics”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Someone do Apple’s and Microsoft’s OS version numbers.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Chatgpt make me a graph comparing your superiority to our competitors!

  • source
  • 47 comments in c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 77 points 1 month ago

    Finally, an LLM benchmark that can’t be faked

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago
    [–] 126 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Wait, we are taking a microblog shitposting community's content seriously?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago*

    Some of the content is:

    { Reply pointing out the absurdity of the OP { OP saying something unhinged } }

    So sometimes, a post made in seriousness is part of the joke.
    And, given the context of this one, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to believe someone would just repost a line-go-up graph without actually reading it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Wow, first time I've seen a completely useless graph

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    ill never get over how stupid windows naming convention is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago
    [–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Chrome bumped its versioning numbers to overtake Firefox back in the day, that's how we ended up with stupid version numbers like 124.1.2 instead of meaningful versions.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Same with Apple skipping iPhone 9 and ditching the S model name for spec bump releases so they have a higher number than the Samsung Galaxy S models and then Samsung went straight from S10 to S20 as a response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    That's how you got stupid Xbox names as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It's not really stupid. Even Linux versioning doesn't mean anything. Linux 6.0 isn't a bigger change than Linux 5.19. It actually feels more like a corporate thing that it is easier for them to have a consistent versioning increase and consistent release schedule. Major changes don't need to be tied to a major change in number because, how do you decide what a major and minor change is? Do you need to group up changes and make the user wait so it becomes a new major version? Google also experienced fragmentation with Android in the past and likely wanted to avoid it. Because if you tie up specific stuff to specific browser versions, some people would want to keep a specific major browser version causing fragmentation. You can just dictate a specific end date of a feature support rather than a browser number to avoid fragmentation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    linus has specifically said that he increments the major number when he runs out of fingers and toes for the minor one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    I’m pretty sure this was Microsoft’s versioning logic for the 90s and 2000s.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    CHATBOT 2000 is off the charts

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    We need a community for statistical jokes like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    thatsthejoke.tensor

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    It they have no quantifyable numbers to measure quality...

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    From the Line Goes Up school of thought.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Sounds reliable. There's a name for claims like that https://github.com/ajnart/trustmebrobenchmarks.com

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    7 Minute Abs!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    This is a perfect example of the intelligence of those who use AI. They have become so used to not having to think or work before reacting.

  • source