๐Ÿคก 3
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 20 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Chrome bumped its versioning numbers to overtake Firefox back in the day, that's how we ended up with stupid version numbers like 124.1.2 instead of meaningful versions.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [โ€“] 12 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Same with Apple skipping iPhone 9 and ditching the S model name for spec bump releases so they have a higher number than the Samsung Galaxy S models and then Samsung went straight from S10 to S20 as a response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    That's how you got stupid Xbox names as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It's not really stupid. Even Linux versioning doesn't mean anything. Linux 6.0 isn't a bigger change than Linux 5.19. It actually feels more like a corporate thing that it is easier for them to have a consistent versioning increase and consistent release schedule. Major changes don't need to be tied to a major change in number because, how do you decide what a major and minor change is? Do you need to group up changes and make the user wait so it becomes a new major version? Google also experienced fragmentation with Android in the past and likely wanted to avoid it. Because if you tie up specific stuff to specific browser versions, some people would want to keep a specific major browser version causing fragmentation. You can just dictate a specific end date of a feature support rather than a browser number to avoid fragmentation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    linus has specifically said that he increments the major number when he runs out of fingers and toes for the minor one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments