all 63 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"Take her meds away and you could have up to 10?" Dayum...that's harsh...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    But you get a harem and she gets loyalty... Worth it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Doesn't washing off her make-up make you date 4?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    yes it should be multiplicative

    | ____  | No glasses | Glasses |
    |-------|-----|------------|
    | No makeup |   |    |
    | Makeup    |   |    |
    

    looks like Lemmy doesn't support markdown tables. Or maybe it's my client

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    If she puts on a monacle, can we have a threesome? 🧐

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    casual sexism alive and well

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    But if you reverse the genders and make the same joke would this be sexism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Yeah, famously, men dont have any body issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Men dont get treated like their aesthetic value is their entire worth. Men tend to get treated like the worth of what they can provide is their worth

    Both are gross and ways that people suffer under patriarchy, but women being reduced to their aesthetic worth, or demeaned for wearing makeup when they're subjected to compulsory expectations of attractiveness are distinctly ways in which women specifically are harmed under patriarchy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah no. Just try being short as a man. You objectively have it way harder when it comes to dating. Imagine being reduced completely to your height alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I may be queer where the culture is different, but I'm 5'5".

    I'm aware of the ways that men can still harshly graded for their appearance. I think my statement stands. And frankly, to me men being expected to be tall feels like an extension of the idea their value is what they can provide.

    There are other parts to the way men are related to or valued. But compulsory performance of attractiveness is not the same for men as it is for women. I have a messy relationship with gender and have walked on both sides of the fence and know a lot of trans folks who have also.

    People are cruel to women that fail to adequately perform attractiveness. Even ones they're not in any way involved with or connected to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Disregarding the comment about meds, people are really weird about glasses. Yeah, your face looks kinda different with or without, but it's not that extreme. Is the general population really so face blind that they can't look through a simple accessory? Are they confused when people with hats take them off?

    A platypus!?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I would say the strength of the prescription can make a big difference. Stronger glasses can have a magnifying effect that changes how the eyes look significantly so they look like a different person without them.

    The woman in the photo doesn't seem to have that effect going on though. I would bet those are either fake glasses for fashion, or a very light correction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Too bad this doesn't work with men. Whatever you do, you'll always date the same asshole.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    One who can see, and one who can't.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It’s amazing how just putting on some glasses gives the appearance of doubling the digits in her IQ.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (24 children)

    "Haha women bad and crazy"

    Didn't realize we were on facebook. Misogynistic boomer humor can fuck off.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Execuse my dumdum but what part implies that? Is it the meds part??? Why is taking meds bad if so, idk what it implies, like bipolarity or schizophrenia or what???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    The meme implies she has multiple personalities. Having dissociative identity disorder (the condition that causes multiple personalities) is not a bad thing, but it is heavily stigmatized, and there is a very VERY long history of dismissing and degrading women on the basis that they're "less mentally stable", which mental health conditions can do, and carry the stigma of doing.

    Hysteria was once a medical diagnosis given to women for "being to emotional and crazy", and the vibrator was invented by a doctor as a medical device intended as a treatment for hysteria. The entire origins of mental health as a field is rooted in "treating" women. And there is still today a patten of people dismissing women by calling them crazy (eg "my ex was crazy"), and a chronic problem in healthcare where women's health issues are not taken seriously and providers treat woman patients as if they're imagining things.

    Its a very familiar narrative but its one that has been used to do a lot of harm to women, and so using it in a meme where you're also criticizing women for wearing makeup (a product of the way women are expected to compulsorily perform attractiveness) reads as sexist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    I did think about DID but doscarded it because I don't think there are any meds for that? I mean probably for stuff closely related but mean like people don't really take meds to make the personalities disappear from my undestanding, some people go to therapy to "merge" those personalities from what I know like if they want to.

    I've heard about the doctor stuff yea, and that all makes sense.

    Also how is it criticizing women for wearing makeup? From my understanding I think it just says she looks different? Unless it implies some uh idk that she is ugly on one side (of wearing or not makeup)??? I honestly don't see the difference between the glasses and the makeup one. If you take a negative interpretation I feel both would be really bad in different ways anyway. Unless I am interpreting something incorrectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Yes, I don't think the person on twitter understands or cares about that with respect to whether DID involves meds

    I only read it as criticism of women for wearing makeup because its an extremely common line of joke where the butt of the joke is generally that women are dishonest about how they look because their makeup changes their appearance. Sometimes the negativity is explicit, sometimes it is implied. And that generally makes me uncomfortable with people joking about that kind of thing. Whereas glasses giving you a different appearance never gets wielded to attack women.

    Were the elements that could be interpreted uncharitably not all combined here (joking about both makeup and also mental illness), and were the context an individual scale interaction rather than the interaction being turned into a meme for mass appeal at scale I might be inclined to interpret more charitably. But the former makes it feel more malicious and the later makes it feel more important that it not be harmful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (17 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (14 children)

    If your idea of a shitpost is the same shit your grandpa would post on Facebook immediately after trying to use the status box as a search bar that makes me sad for you

    Maybe we can do unironic minion memes about drinking too much wine next

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    “My” idea of a shitpost? I don’t self define the meaning of words and phrases…

    Use any reputable on or off line resource that defines shitposting and then chime back with a cohesive argumente as to why this isn’t, apparently, a shitpost.

    Double dare you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    My point isnt about whether its a shitpost, thats what your point is about.

    Mine is that shitposting by literally just posting marginal sexist boomer memes is dumb and theres literally no joy in that. Its a sad and lame way to shitpost. The joy in shitposting is the absurdity. This isnt even a bad enough to be enjoyable for it's absurdly bad quality. This belongs next to your wine-mom aunt talking about how much she wants to drink wine, displayed as text over an ai generated minion

    Theres no irony in it. Theres not playfulness in it. Its just a meme that circlejerks about how much the poster thinks "woman bad". My grandpa with shitty takes on the world would unironically enjoy this meme.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Whilst I mostly enjoy the more absurd / surreal / dadist qualities of posts the same as you do I still really admire some of these cat amongst the pigeons or spanner in the works type posts. Their ability to be taken at face value makes me laugh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Not the one who downvoted you, using down votes for people engaging with you sincerely always seems shitty to me-

    I can't say I relate to the humor you see in it, but I'm glad at least someone is enjoying it in some fashion. I just dont exactly get the impression everyone is upvoting because as an ironic shitpost- It validates a lot of shitty preconceived notions people have that do real harm, and casual sexism is probably the most unpleasant thing exported here from reddit when people moved over (which, this is a direct automated cross post from reddit. The account just automates posting reddit memes)

    In my mind its hard to give something a pass if its both gross and preys on internalized harmful stereotypes or heirachies AND seems deeply unfunny. If I wanted Facebook memes making fun of women I feel like I'd go literally anywhere else on the internet. It doesnt feel tongue in cheek to me if its just the actual crappy sexist memes from actually sexist parts of the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don’t really look at votes - we’re all disparate netizens with our own ideas. Pluses and minuses ain’t no thing.

    Outside of the context of this specific community everything you say is completely valid and, probably, quite true.

    I’ll concede that this veers quite close to ragebait but ultimately fails that test; in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Thats fair, I just have social anxiety and am sensitive to what social ques I send 😅

    I think it'd be possible for it to be ragebait of op had any personal intentions when posting this specifically at all, but like I said, this is an automated reddit cross post, which I think kinda precludes considering it ragebait 🤷🏻‍♂️ in some ways that also makes it feel less like a shitpost and more like spam, but that's just me

    Regardless of looking at things differently I appreciate you engaging with me sincere, I hope you have a lovely day ☺️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I’m partly replying because you mentioned social anxiety… and didn’t want to leave you hanging.

    The other thing is about up/down votes. With the fediverse particularly votes seem to be affected more where you speak than what you say.

    Each instance and more so community has a distinct flavour. A couples meme won’t work on a femcel comm. A new publication of a bible would bomb with the atheists but might be a hit with the book enthusiasts. So don’t worry about votes… we’re all complete strangers and our opinions, whilst interesting, are just opinions.

    You’ll be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    You can always make your own shitposting community where all posts have adhere to your personal sense of humour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    Or I can just say I think sexist jokes that aren't even funny kinda suck.

    I'll yuck other people's sexist boomerhumor yum all I want, thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    You are right, being a whiny bitch is indeed allowed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    We're social creatures, If I want a space without sexist shit and a culture where that kinda stuff is unwelcome, that means saying "ew, gross" when someone shows up with sexist shit. I wouldn't even care that much that its unfunny if it weren't also misogynistic.

    Call me whiny all you want. I don't like sexism, and if my taking issue with it sounds like whining to you I think that says more about you than me.

    It'd be nice to have at least one small corner of the internet where laughing about bigotry told through the saddest memes imaginable isnt the norm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago* (9 children)

    Women are crazy liars! 🤣🤣🤣

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (6 children)

    (Disregard if this is sarcastic and you're mocking the "haha women bad" sentiment. Reading sarcasm over the internet is hard.)

    If this is unironic and not satire please either leave, or find it within you to do some growing as a person. Either way, the folks you're currently in community with here dont deserve to be subjected to this shit. It's gross.

    Unironic "haha women bad" may be welcome on other parts of the internet but it's not welcome here. You share this space with women, and they're much more worthwhile online social partners than you are at present

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yes, I was making fun of the sentiment of this meme. I hoped the extra emojis would sell it but I guess not!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Lol, totally fair. Sadly there are folks in the comments butthurt at me for pointing out sexism, so its hard to tell when its poking fun at the sexism of it, or participating 🥲

    Hope you have a lovely day! ☺️

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    So you thought that dressing sexism up in some fun emojis would make it okay? You're just going to mask your misogyny in funny emojis to make it palatable? You're either dumb or a troll and I can't tell which.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    They were making fun of the sexism. Satirizing how dumb and sexist the meme is isnt the same thing as participating

    They're saying they were hoping the emojis would make clear their comment was making fun of the meme and how sexist it is, rather than a sincere comment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment