Whatever makes you sleep at night bud

top 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 165 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Talking points have been distributed

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Hahaha Michelle Maxwell had a 4 out of 5 chance of getting the stressed word correct and completely bombed. Impressive stuff. Almost any other of those words would have been better than 'of'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Huh, they let Betty be a lesbian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    How can you tell from this picture?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 76 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    My bike gets like 100 miles per gallon of oatmeal

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    That can't be good for the fuel injector.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    density of oatmeal (source (although this is with sugar)): 693 kg/m³ = 0.69 kg/L

    nutritional value of oatmeal (source): 297 kJ/100g = 2970 kJ/kg

    (oatmeal with sugar and stuff: 4600 kJ/kg, same source as the first one)

    typical leisurely cycling energy expenditure (source): 80 kJ/km

    bicycle oatmeal-efficiency: (2970 kJ/kg * 0.69 kg/L) / (80 kJ / km) ≈ 25.62 km/L ≈ 3.9 L/100km ≈ 60 mpg

    bicycle oatmeal-efficiency with sugary oatmeal: (4600 kJ/kg * 0.69 kg/L) / (80 kJ/km) ≈ 39.68 km/L ≈ 2.5 L/100km ≈ 93 mpg

    please do correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like the math pretty much checks out on that one!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Nothing beats bicycle when it's comes to efficiency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    Interestingly, it depends on how you measure efficiency.

    Per unit of sunlight that hits a patch of land, solar panels capture about 20% of the sunlight that hits. Charging a vehicle battery and powering the motor might result in a 25% loss, so that we're basically converting about 15% of the sunlight into movement.

    In contrast, plants convert only about 1-2% of sunlight energy through photosynthesis. Feeding that plant biomass to be converted into stored energy in an animal, and then that animal moving its muscles to propel a vehicle, we might be talking a huge loss there, too, so that we're looking at less than 1% of the sunlight being turned into motion.

    If you want to most efficiently convert sunlight into movement, bypassing any and all biological processes is probably the most efficient thing to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    So I should start eating solar panels then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    There was a startup that made a splash last year by claiming they had a process that could manufacture organic compounds, including edible fats resembling animal-derived butter, out of nothing but carbon dioxide, water, and energy, through a Fischer-Tropsch process.

    I could see a world where people on a spaceship more efficiently use their sunlight to create synthetic edible macronutrients rather than using that same sunlight to try to grow edible plants.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Yeah but plants just like magically appear, solar panels need raw materials, a factory and all the infrastructure that comes with that. Add that mess into your equations.

    I feel - apple grows on a tree in my garden, I eat apple, I power bicycle is more efficient than - I mine raw materials, I build factory, I bring all raw materials to factory, I power factory and produce solar panels, I put solar panels in field, hook them up to the power grid, and then think about charging my ebike which also took way more raw materials than a bicycle due to lack of battery and I would still need to power myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Add that mess into your equations.

    What percentage of your calorie intake comes from industrialized agriculture, where planting, growing, and harvesting the food uses a significant amount of fossil fuels and fertilizers and other inputs that come from industrialized production?

    Home grown and locally grown food is pretty good for flavor, but not particularly efficient with calories.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    ... whie just a few microliters of LSD can transport you across the ENTIRE UNIVERSE

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They say DMT feela like loading the Universe into the cannon and shooting yourself with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    DMT is IMO not a "recreational" drug. The few times I've done it, it was a shitload of mental and emotional work to keep up with. Definitely alternate realities though -- LSD lets you wander into otherworldly thoughts; Psilocybin lets you visualize them vividly; DMT slams them into your sensory apparatus like a brick wrapped in lemon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    For the damage it's doing, fossil fuels should be several times more expensive to compensate in climate change costs and reduce demand.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There should be a carbon tax, but whoever signs it will be the least popular president in history. One of the flaws of democracy is that sometimes the thing that really needs to happen is unpopular with the moronic citizenry that can't understand why it needs to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Has he tried HP printer ink?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I find it too metallic to be a solid drink, but the price does make me feel fancy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Just a shot now and then, as a treat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The problem isn't that prices are going up. The problem is we're not paid anywhere near what we should be.

    AKA The rich get richer while the poor get poorer.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    It's both. We're not getting paid the full value of our labor, annual wage cuts are the default, and the only safe ways to save require buying into that same system of oppression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    The problem isn't any of those things. The problem is that there isn't enough affordable housing, and not enough housing period. We're literally in a near-global housing crisis. Everything else would be fine if that wasn't the case.

    Wages are double what they used to be when gas was $2/gallon. So $4/gallon shouldn't be a problem.

    The problem is housing, followed by grocery. And in some areas, followed by energy.

    Gas isn't even on the list. It only feels as bad as it does because of everything else.

    Not that it couldn't be cheaper.

    ...And not like any country is selfless with their natural resources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    And also the system of global exploitation that gave us cheap goods because we oppressed the global south into accepting low wages (aka imperialism) has reached a point where the capitalists are extracting diminishing returns. This means they have to turn their gaze towards home and exploit us more in order to keep increasing their profit margins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Petrol is super cheap, because the only thing you can really do with it is burn it for energy.

    That and you waste 60-90 percent of that energy potential as heat.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What if we harvest that heat for energy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    That is exactly what we are doing in the upper end of that efficiency range (turbochargers, turbine generators, heater cores) - the waste heat from that is unharvestable (exhaust gas, engine core heat).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Yea, combined cycle gas turbine power plants are pushing above 60% efficiency. They use the waste heat from the turbine exhaust to generate steam and then extract energy from there. About as good as it gets.

    Cars could be a lot better if emissions wasn't a concern.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    EV charging stations should start putting up gas station style boards showing the current price per kWh. Not that a kWh of electrons gets you as far as a gallon of gas, but a substantial chunk of the population will see the smaller number and start thinking about switching.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I mean even then it is way cheaper compared to gasoline. Around me, EV stations charge ~$0.50/kwh (give or take) and gas is ~$4.50/gal. Assuming 5 mi/kwh and 25 mpg, that comes out to $0.10/mi on electric and $0.18/mi on gas. So in "gas prices", EVs cost ~$2.50/gal and that's assuming you don't do most of your charging at home, which takes it down to ~$0.08/kwh around me ($0.016/mi or $0.40/gal equivalent).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    The conversion for eMPG (which yes, is possibly the most cursed of units) is ~33 kwh equals a gallon. My PNW home electricity prices are pretty low, but that puts an eGallon at ~$2.97.

    If anything I think that number is misleadingly high, but that's part of why it's possibly the most cursed unit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I remember this exact same post when Biden was president... oh wait, no I don't.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    Technically he isn't wrong, but not for the reasons he thinks. Gas prices are subsidized significantly. And if they weren't, people sure wouldn't drive as much. Unsubsidized it would be between 10 and 15 per gallon. So if 2 to 4 is double, that would mean it would now be 20 to 30. So like a dollar a mile in his math.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Remember when gas went up a little bit under Biden and these motherfuckers never shut the fuck up about it? I am sick of this shit

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    By that logic, the most cost-effective fuel would be a little baggie of shrooms.

    For less than $10, it will transport him 20-light-years to another realm of existence, where he can have afternoon tea and crumpets with a friendly Narwhal named Gershwin, lounging under a rainbow.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Pic I took the other day, price was the same when I drove past it last night

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Truly spoken like someone with too much disposable.

    More and more people can't afford the wine or the fancy coffee, or the gasoline to get to the fancy restaurant, or the time to eat out after working their two jobs, or the 4000-lb SUV to pour the gasoline into, because they need their old banger and the gasoline to haul their ass to work to earn enough to pay rent, utilities and a bit more gasoline to stay on the hamster wheel for one more month - month after month.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago*

    This. And the other consideration they aren't factoring in is that the cost of gasoline makes everything else more expensive, too.

    Based on what I know of wine, a $9/glass varietal is on the lower end of quality today, but that was about average a few years ago. My recollection is that a cheap wine would have gone for $5/glass in 2010. The Two Buck Chuck that we bought by the case in college now costs almost $5.

    The wine hasn't gotten any better. But it costs more to move that wine by truck to the store, so the price goes up. It costs more to manufacture the bottles and power the equipment they use to process the grapes. It costs more to harvest and transport the grapes in the first place. It's a chain of price increases down the line that all add up with the cost of gas.

    Wages haven't meaningfully increased at a comparable rate either. Even if you're earning a bit more now on paper than you were 5-10 years ago, everyone's purchasing power has dropped significantly. Even if prices of certain goods haven't gone up that much, I have to think a lot more about my spending today than I used to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I rather drink a glass of wine than 2 gallons of gasoline.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The focus on golf clubs tells me exactly the type of person this is. Also, my bike will transport my wife and clubs for a lot longer than 30 minutes on cheap Ramen lunch.

    That is If I had golf clubs…

    Or a bike…

    And my wife may have left me...

    Now I’m hungry for noodles.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Where I live, gas is 2.28€/L, that's about $11.80/gallon, still people rather drive their car to work every day instead of riding the 2000€ eBike collecting dust in their garage, and they are 5km (3.1mi) away from work. I would argue has price is not expensive enough for them.

    On the other hand, the student we have on part time, rides the train 2 hours to come, because it's too expensive for him to tank up his motorcycle.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Which weighs more, a gallon of gold or a gallon of feathers? /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yes, so now you have "justified" the gas prices. What about the child grape, misogyny, racism, and general evil?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    What happens to the other half of the junk in his trunk?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    Pushing £2/litre here and I am still waiting for air quality to improve. Maybe £5/litre is necessary.

    Higher prices for most with reductions on red diesel could possibly be a good compromise.

    You don't need a fucking SUV to go to the corner shop 500m away.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    the corner shop 500m away

    A lot of Americans live 30 minutes from the nearest real grocery store.

    But yeah they still don't need a lifted truck to go there. It's not like the cashiers at the Wal Mart Super Center are going to be impressed by their Carolina Squat lifted white pavement princess, but that's what they insist on driving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    30 minutes is cycling to another town here. Or if you want to drive during rush hour, it gets you half way down the main road.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    That's how the US is in certain metro areas. In the boonies there are hundreds of miles of rural back roads where people drive 60mph during rush hour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Wow... I don't get this guy. He never had $0.92/gal gas?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Prices of USA is like in Russia, while in Europe we are paying 10dollars a gallon. Stop whining.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    How much is lsd or shrooms in comparison? Im sure he will have a hell of a long trip for the price.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›