Meta glasses without camera
So just normal glasses?
Meta glasses without camera
So just normal glasses?
It won't be enough to just remove the cameras and quietly sell them. They're gonna need to somehow make it very clear there is no camera. Through both an ad campaign and by the styling of the glasses. If they don't, no one will trust them, or the people wearing them. But, I suspect they'll try, because it's shameful to publicly admit fucking up so badly. And, billionaires aren't good at accepting shame.
There was a dude 3D printing brightly coloured clip ons to cover the camera. Not a bad idea.
Still not touching that shit until someone comes out with one with zero cloud connectivity
Maybe it's still too early and my coffee hasn't fully kicked in, but what could be done with these without cloud connectivity? I assume the hardware is severely limited due to power requirements and size limitations.
My phone is wicked smaht as they say. It can easily run detection algorithms fully locally. It already knows peoples faces I’ve tagged in my photos, where I am, what’s my agenda etc.
All the glasses need to do is interface with the phone for all tasks they can’t manage internally.
A smartwatch, but as glasses if you will.
Also if I do want any internet/cloud access, I trust my phone to do that in a way I prefer instead of just giving everything to Zuck’s ad machine.
I could imagine some uses for non-connected smart glasses. Mechanics who may want to refer to schematics as they work with both hands, without having to disengage and paw through paper or look it up on a laptop? Ppl with various disabilities, run a cheap algorithm to give acoustic cues to blind people?
Prob is, there's no visual way to know if the devices are cloud connected and spying for FB, or not. And even if not, if they're storing pics locally that will later get sent to a big tech co.
I miss the pre-IOT days TBH.
If someone is wearing glasses made by Meta and aren't being held at gunpoint for it, I don't trust them camera or no camera
I got a pair of Shokz bluetooth bone conduction headphones that I tend to jam next to my prescription glasses and it'd be cool to have that integrated, I imagine this is not going to be even close to that though, just the same perv shit without a camera.
I had two pairs of bose frames when tgey came out and they are (theoretically) fantastic. They sound really good, and you don't have anything in your ears. Shokz are nice, but i hate when they were lound enough that you could feel them vibrate. Anyway, bose frames, too expensive, because both of them broke the same way, tgey are just too fiddly, and the little contact in the hinges broke i think. And no one ever made knockoffs and even bose gave up
Buying meta products is a red flag. Camera or no camera. Mic or no mic.
It makes me gag when people praise the meta quest.
When VR is brought up and people say but Meta costs... I tune them out, since I refuse to buy one. Maybe if it could have the OS fully wiped like flashing GrapheneOS on a Pixel.
But, that's not the case for Meta products so using their hardware is a big no even if I got it free.
Soooo, regular glasses?
I assume they would still have a microphone, voice recognition, and report everything you and anyone around you do.
They're trying to flood the market with mimics to manufacture a smokescreen a la "not every set that looks like the versions with cameras actually have them" bullshit.
Oh so we not know which banned or not? Sorry, banned all, not my fault.
Sorry, what?
If cannot tell if camera or not, and camera banned, then ban all because cannot know if banned or not.
So "smokescreen" would just get entire smoke ban too.
Like not allowed get dull metal sword or replica in public place. Because cannot know if sharp. So cannot allow smart glasses because cannot know if camera.
Ah, it's a translation issue, my apologies. Regardless, the current regime (anywhere, sadly) won't see this as a blanket statement on the tech itself, and will use it to prop up the newest version of their surveillance "for the greater good" (aka "profits").
Not germany, we have people work on ban entire product category.
Hunh. Why does your accent sound Russian? 😜
Too much vodka, pretty sure.
Nicht Apfelwein oder Glühwein? Wie konntet ihr nur?! 🤷🏼♂️🥲
Ehrlich gesagt mag ich sowieso Whisky mehr. Vodka ist aber geil für Liköre.
Ich hatte selbst mal eine Whiskey-Phase und davor eine Rum-Phase, also verstehe ich dich. Aber wenn du im Moment eher auf klare Spirituosen stehst, könnten dir selbstgebrannter Schnaps oder hochprozentiger Alkohol – aber mit Vorsicht – gefallen.
Selbstbeherrschung ist unerlässlich, besonders bei Poitín. 🤘🏼
(Außerdem habe ich mein Deutsch seit '06 nicht mehr viel benutzt, und das auch nur in Frankfurt mit fantastischen Einheimischen, also entschuldigen Sie meine ungenauen Notizen.)😅🙇🏼♂️
Hey für 20 Jahre kein Deutsch gesprochen klingst du relativ gut. Respekt.
(Ich glaube statt Notizen meintest du Kommentare)
Das ist sehr nett von dir, vielen Dank! Ich versuche so viel wie möglich zu üben!
(Außerdem hatte ich eher an „falsch gespielte Noten“ als Metapher für unpräzise Phrasierung gedacht, aber ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob ich das im Deutschen schon mal gesehen/gehört habe.) 😅🤏🏼
The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones [...]
So the glasses will still record innocent bystanders without consent, only without video? That's not much better. The shaming will and should continue.
Obligatory: you have been able to record people without consent since the 80s.
Should we shame people with phones if their phone has a microphone?
No, we shouldn't shame people for using a device that happens to have a microphone. But we absolutely should shame people who knowingly and flagrantly use recording devices with a complete disregard to other people's privacy.
Honestly, I personally even barely care about the individual people who do this - that's been a thing for nearly 20 years now. Don't get me wrong - secretly filming people is creepy as fuck, and it's rightly illegal without consent in a lot of places.
But I'm more pissed off about is that beside the individuals, it's also being saved by corporations on an unprecedented and almost inconceivable scale. But it doesn't even stop at that massive privacy invasion - that data is then used, processed and extrapolated to wring every known piece of data out of it, to make a profit for those companies. Plus, since it's stored, they will also use it in the future, in ways we haven't even considered right now.
All of which without you knowing, or your consent. Creeps are one problem, but imho it's nothing compared to the companies that actually profit from it.
Obligatory: you have been able to record people without consent since the 80s.
Where? In my country (Spain) has never been prohibited in public spaces, except in recent years that record the police has been forbidden. ACAB
Point being that you didn’t need to ask for consent before any more than now. It might be illegal, but who cares, really?
Over here it’s legal to record any conversation you are a part of or can “reasonably hear”. So no parabolic shotgun mics allowed 😀
In Finland you are always allowed to record conversations you take part in. Law limits what you can use it for though.
In the US that varies by state. California is "two party consent" so you need permission. If you just mean you can do it illegally, tape recorders have been around since way before the 1980s.
In some countries the camera apps on phones are required to make a shutter noise when you take a picture so it's harder to do secretly.
So now you can buy the pervert glasses and all the public hatred without even getting to be a pervert. Genius.
I had a showerthought about the incident with the gym manager wearing pervglasses - what if it was all kept on a central server, no user access with ~2 week deletion, it's just an employee-worn security camera.
But then I thought, Deus Ex wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual.
Or they found a way to hide the camera from the users and now you're grabbing video that you don't have access to or even know about. Check out the matte black lens covers that are essentially just windows from one side.
I heard that these are piracy devices intended for recording copyrighted music!
I’ll still be calling them “pervert glasses”
Reportedly will have 6 microphones listening for the user and anyone unfortunate enough to be within earshot
Its sad that when we got a new tool, that can actually be really useful for certain people (like people with vision impairment) the best we can do is immediately use it for sex crimes.
all 12 comments