the - sau - rus
post
This post looks like it was written by an ai that had a stroke.
Honestly, just take a generic picture of any band and just use paint or gimp to slap their faces on. Hell doesn't even have to be good
"It’s lazy and a ultimatumon effort and autodidatic capacity."
dafuk
Your writing is shit, buddy.
Bro fell out of the thesauraus tree and hit every branch on the way down
At least it isn't AI.
I'll take irritation fueled spelling error littered rants over a succinct, correctly parsed AI slop response any day of the week
How can you tell? It might very well be considering how many fancy words were used there. Nothing about that reads as not-AI.
I'd rather be a lousy illiterate doofus than a gutless GPT-reliant hypocrite.
Maybe use an LLM to clean it up
Ouch. The stupid thing is that this existed 4 years ago too. This doesn’t have to be anything AI. We’ve been photoshopping since the printing press was a thing.
What a misplaced post to rant about a tech that may have nothing to do with the picture.
Then they will be yelled at for that. There’s no winning for someone like them. And someone else in the thread still said it looks like AI as it is.
IKR, But i have sincere communication deficiencies and struggles to paraphrase sentences.
I'm a fucking prolapse to the reproductive system of the queen's English.
It's been enlightening to see how many people lash out at you personally, using the sleights they hope you'd consider most offensive, in response to your opinions on a technology.
this is what these people want Lemmy to be: post something thoughtful about a topic you're passionate about. every comment is attacking you personally, insulting you, and picking at the way you expressed yourself. they're not even disagreeing with the sentiment, purely just dont like a stranger's communication style and can't help but make their own unexamined reaction everyone's problem. i wish these people would get off Lemmy
Not reading all that. Free Palestine!
OMG the irony of using AI to rail against the use of AI.
Bro, this would just be the top spot in photoshop battles. A skillset that used to be really really accessible is now no longer even fun because well-done results will be considered gen AI.
Also, your writing seems like an AI prompt that says: be outraged at AI, make every mistake.
Whoever made that could have easily done it with basic photo editing skills instead of AI. Even if it didn't turn out great, it would still show that a person cared enough to try doing it themselves.
Who cares? It's a meme. You look at it for a few seconds and never think about it again.
Why spend time with an editing tool for something that gives people a quick laugh and makes you zero revenue?
Did you eat a thesaurus?
Not just AI, but I recognized the use of it to create music videos featuring leaders. "Iran so far away" was a very popular video from months ago that racked up millions of views on YouTube.

And the creator is about as obviously a fascist as they could be without stating it outright.

Fascists clearly do not mind anybody who just memes on the people in power.
Views on AI have nothing to do with left or right. It's actually split right down the middle on both sides.
But the left wouldn't be the left if we weren't fucking fighting each other all the time instead of the right.
Idk... Anarchism and ML have history lol
Lmao in one sentence you perfectly exposed why anarchists hate MLs. Aside from all the historical bs, anarchists are just expected to go along with ML because it's "better than capitalism", but you'll never see any ML giving any ground to anarchists.
Ironically that makes you quite similar to liberals, who always want the left to support them but never give any ground :)
Personally, I can fight more than one thing at a time. But since you don't think that's possible, why are you more focused on fighting anarchists in your comment than capitalism? Is this projection? Are you a liberal? 🤔
Yes and no. AI (the ideal) is labor replacement, similar to the first industrial machines. But instead of manual labor, it is replacing cognitive labor. Under capitalism, when profit is always the end game, labor saving tech will not be used to liberate, but to further exploit the people and rape our planet. This is no different, I think. Usually this kind of capital is held mostly in the hands of one class of people, but this tech is unique in that it has the ability to, once trained, be copied and iterated on by others. Open source, or eventually hacked. Software yearns to be free, in the sense that it can be copied easily. Point is, control over the development and distribution of AI is so difficult that even the "common sense" right* end up feeling betrayed. It mainly benefits the far right and the oligarchic class.
For now, it is not the ideal. But the intentions of the most powerful people seem to continue to race towards unregulated, privately controlled AI. They talk of slowing down, but I don't have my hopes up after everything that's happened.
The ironic thing is that this post reads like it was written by an AI trained on only thesauruses.
Thesauri? Thesaures?
Let me guess, people were supposed to edit and rewrite the AI output to "make it theirs"!
Jesus christ that text post was mildly infuriating. Please slow down and use words you both know how to spell and how to use in a sentence.
kthx.
mint condition barbed wire
Mint condition is probably the worst condition to be using barbed wire in the given circumstances. You have weasels ripping your flesh and shiny new barbed wire? What you're setting yourself up for is a case of rabies and for some reason leaving out the lockjaw you can get from rusty barbed wire. So you'll have a case of the rabies and not have a case of lockjaw to stop you from biting your friends.
As with pollution, the biggest contributers are not the individual consumers.
They still contribute by counting as usage to help justify more datacenters for training.
Even just cloud storage uses a surprising amount of energy. I’ve my students calculate a price per rick roll just to start seeing that there are actual energy costs and usage associated with things like google search, storing a cloud file, etc. I forget the paradox name, but we’ve made storing files and the cloud (that is, using other people’s computers) so easy and efficient that we are now using even more energy.
Doesn't count nearly as much as all the water used to farm alfalfa in the desert for the Saudis. AI sucks, this is just a way for corporate AI to push blame on consumers. They want people to push this line cause it's catchy and easily countered.
Honestly there are bigger fish to fry, and the world isn't black and white.
Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.
I'm sure theres a few other idiom's I'm not thinking of.
So it’s still about the leftists ???
Correct me please but when we have an AI pic with Trump and Netanyahu it’s still about the leftists?
I liked the imagery of you scratching your eyes out.
Don't mind the people shitting on your writing! It's fine.
Also, I wonder about this. I don't like using GenAI for a few reasons, one of them is the environmental impact, but it's by no means the biggest. Not even close. It really is barely a reason at all.
It's a tool... I think it's immorally constructed and mostly in bad taste, but the environment is really a much deeper failure than the individual, I think. I don't think campaigning against people using something mindlessly, ignorantly perhaps, blithely even, does much good, when you could spend that time convincing them that the big stuff, and there's big stuff like data centers if we wanna just stick to AI, should be banned or regulated to oblivion.
"Don't use GenAI" is fine, but "Data centers suck" results in the same thing and doesn't attack the individual for some perceived moral failing for doing something innocuous while surrounded by terrible shit.
Hopefully you get what I'm getting at!
The verbosity of your interlocution is positively sesquipedalian.
How are people doing these so common though, the big models wont do real people
Local models?
Are they that common? There is so much of it out there, are there that many dipshit memers running local models?
Anyone with a gaming PC can spin up ComfyUI and produce an image like this with a fraction of the power of playing a single round of CS:GO.
Shit, I can generate AI images on my phone. Locally. Using 'Local Dream.'
Oh no, a rainforest burned down and the oceans turned to desert because I used my phone! /s
Bluesky leftists really like using AI for some reason
It's not humorous, it's cheap, derivative slop. This used to be a passing thought you would have on the can, accompanied by a chuckle and a fart, forgotten minutes later.
Now someone parlays the flatulence into a voice prompt and suddenly it's as much part of the record of humankind as Hammurabi's code. Fucking disgrace.
Anyone know any studies comparing the energy usage of an AI image generator vs manually photo shopping. If a person spends say a half hour on a computer finding a photo and editing it in photoshop to this quality it could cost as much electricity as an image generator.
I think people are starting to overestimate the energy usage of AI while underestimating everything else we do. Like an image like this would take my computer ~30 seconds to generate, meanwhile I'll use my computer for hours at a time to play games and don't think much of that.
It would take 30-60 seconds for one image. But the chance of getting the right one is slim. You'd probably generate hundreds, settle on one, then modify that one further. Depending on how precise you want it, it could take over an hour of GPU use. Services that do it online are doing the same thing in the background, maybe generating even more and iterating and evaluating them. All while using many GPUs at once. This isn't so bad for an image, but videos are way more resource intensive.
I didn't realize people shut off their computers after having AI do something they might not have otherwise done anyway. Brains, yes. Computers, no.
They do actually. And for the people not running local models, the idea of cloud computing is that once you're done with it, someone else takes over. If you're talking about the necessity of it all, sure, but we're also not exactly advancing the human race by being on Lemmy are we?
We appear to agree that AI simply increases the amount of energy usage rather than supplanting it, and that energy-intensive AI data centers are the norm for AI usage (such as the use OP is talking specifically about).
- I never claimed that computer usage goes down thanks to AI, and honestly I don't see how that could be interpreted from my comment.
- I never implied offline models are the norm anymore than you implied ChatGPT sits idle once a user logs off.
I'm not going to do that, because I hate it when comments get edited in such a way that the whole context changes. However, to clarify: to your reply "I didn't realize people shut off their computers after having AI do something they might not have otherwise done anyway" I answered that yes, people actually do that. If they run a local model, the model also shuts down. If they don't run a local model, they can still shut down their computer and the next user can use ChatGPT or whatever online model they use.
I think we just don't understand each other here. At least, I'm lost at what belief I have to back up. But I'll wind back to the first reply I made, and remove any comparison of local models vs cloud, since I don't know how many people use the cloud models, and I don't know how many people use local models. So, here it goes:
Your reply is about people turning off their computers after using AI. Which they can and will do. Now, again, forget about the local models or online models. It's just people using AI and then turning off their computers, and you stated you didn't know people do this. I hereby state that people actually do that.
So, before someone goes back to why I dragged local and cloud models into this: (and trying to answer to what I think was implied in your original comment) I wrote about local models vs cloud computing, and that cloud computing doesn't stop being useful after one user is done with it. This may also be read as an indirect reply to the person you replied to, who stated people over estimate the energy usage of using AI vs doing it the other way.
If we take the AI industry's reports in good faith, not counting the training, the computer the prompting was done wasn't used for other things afterwards, the AI one-shotted the image and the user didn't ask for revisions (which "anti-slop" AI boosters are against), etc.
Love Sinead but AI/the Bourgeoisie is the real enemy.
AI and people using it to make memes are not the real enemy.
The real enemy are the assholes using it for actual nefarious and greedy purposes. Using it to make memes doesn't fall into the nefarious or greedy categories.

Credits to pmjv



top 97 comments