all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 1 month ago (1 child)

I would celebrate! We are a team. We are invested in each other's success.

If you would be upset, or feel inadequate, in response to your wife's unprecedented success, you simply do not have the temperament for marriage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    And even if you are envious, it's better to be remembered as someone's spouse for centuries than forgotten after a few decades, like most people are. Marrying someone who'll be remembered for centuries is a major achievement in its own right.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The right husband would be proud, not threatened

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Byron’s story created the vampire romance genre though

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Not Byron. It was Polidori.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_William_Polidori

    Edit: Polidori wrote his story based on an abandoned work by Byron.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Mary Shelley's actual husband, Percy Shelley, was a poet. Imagine having a career as a professional writer and your wife, who's never published a work of fiction ever, writes a novel for a competition and becomes so famous for it, your name becomes a footnote in history under hers.

    I'm all for supporting the endeavors and success of your spouse, but that still has to sting a little bit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Percy Shelley at least gets due credit as a poet among poetry lovers, and a break on the prose competition because it's not his genre. And Byron has his own fame/notoriety. But John Polidori is like Ron Goldman, a footnote in his own murder.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    Folks Missing that she beat Lord Byron

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    iirc Percy was very proud of her work

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    What a bizarre rant.

    Mary Shelley was married to Percy Shelley, a famous poet.

    Which doesn’t diminish Mary Shelley’s accomplishments, regardless.

    And what if we swapped the genders?

    You could do the same to Mileva Marić but that would make you an asshole.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Also kind of ridiculous, because looking deeper into it, Lord Byron wrote "Fragment of a Novel" which seems to be credited as the first vampire themed English literature, though he never finished it.

    So literally the competition produced the Vampire and Frankenstein theme in English horror. It's more interesting to me that a bunch of writers played a little game and basically invented so much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    It would be great - only someone really insecure would have a problem??

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Lord Byron was no slouch either. She overshadowed someone who puts off a decent light himself, that is how badly he was owned.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Marry Shelley's husband was not John Polidori, it was Percy Bysshe Shelley. Surprised no one picked this up. Percy was an amazing poet.

    John Polidori was in love with Mary, but was not married to her

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The OP does not suggest that John Polidori was her husband. There's a comma between "her husband" and "John Polidori". And in fact the post seems to be correct (judging by Wiki):

    In 1816—at the suggestion of Lord Byron—Mary, Percy, John Polidori and Byron himself, each agreed to try writing a ghost story

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Well, it's an unclear structure. Putting a comma before and after someone's name is correct if including the name would not change the meaning of the sentence, as in this case. In the case of OP's sentence, it could have implied that Polidori was Mary Shelley's husband as his name, while important to the meaning of the sentence, was included in a list of other people, including Mary Shelley, Mary Shelley's husband, and Lord Byron.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    I agree it is ambiguous, however usually you don't separate parentheticals by commas inside a comma-separated list, so the "more likely" reading is the one without the parenthetical.

    An unambiguous version that doesn't diminish the joke would be "Lord Byron, John Polidori, Mary Shelley, and her husband". But alas it's difficult for writers to find ambiguities in texts that they write (that's what editors are for).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    I see the comma now, but Percy Bysshe Shelley was an incredible writer who is studied and lauded, rightly, on his own merit. Anyone reading this thinking Mary's husband is insignificant compared to Frankenstein needs to read Ozymandias or The Masque of Anarchy right now and witness this beautiful, humanistic and liberatory spirit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I think that was just poor grammar, seems like "her husband" and John Polidori are two separate characters in the statement not that John Polidori was an elaboration of what her husband's name was. But that's how I read it initially too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I know next to nothing about this. Was it her first novel?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yup. She did write a lot, mind you, but not really to be published. Her father ran a publishing house and I think she wrote a childrens verse for him when she was a kid but otherwise it was journals and imaginative stuff as a kid. The first thing she properly wrote was, indeed, Frankenstein. If memory serves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Naturally I'd try to be supportive but it would be hard not to get a little competitive if you knew the long term outcome along the lines of "I need to step up my game"

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I would be so proud 🖤

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    The Vampyre doesn’t get enough love 😿

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    That may be the greatest thing I’ve read in a long time

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago

    frankestein is the most boring and shit book i have ever had the displeasure to read

  • source