all 66 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 1 month ago (13 children)

My whole arse life has been a decline aloneside the diminishing returns as the boomer fools gobble it all up and resent us. It is not hard to imagine I wish I was never born. Abortions for all.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    If you're miserable you should leave. Australia welcomes Americans and the standard of living is much better, even Canada, UK, get out while you still can. I don't know how Americans endure it while their passport is still semi powerful

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Don't know abt Aus but Americans can't just resettle in Canada. They need to immigrate like every other poor world sod if they want to stay here and work / get benefits permanently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    It's not like Australia doesn't have its own problems with cost of living, being essentially still a colony of the US Empire, etc. It's a global empire that has global effects, and just moving doesn't solve anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    God why the fuck are you cunts downvoting me I was just trying to help. Sometimes as an individual you need to focus on making sure that you're okay before trying to fix the world's problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Your being downvoted (by me at least) because I don't want more of america exporting its sick culture and bad attitudes to Australia. It's bad enough that every channel is chock-a-block with US crime dramas, and locally-made movies need to have an american lead to be considered for development. I want less american accents in my life, not more. Americans should stay in the shithole mess they created and work on fixing it, thank you very much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yeah I agree Americans are generally pretty awful but sometimes they're just ordinary reasonable people like you and me that want to live a productive normal life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 1 month ago (25 children)

    It’s not hard to imagine, and I think it’s time for that. I say this as an American citizen. This country does not deserve to be the dominant empire. I really don’t know who does though.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I think we, humans globally, should try for no dominant empire. I think if we all get together and think really hard, we can come up with a better system than "whichever group has the most guns and money gets to do whatever they want and take whatever they want, whenever". It just never ends well. Or middles well. Or begins well! It's a bad system for most of the people, most of the time, inside and outside of the dominant empire du jour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Getting rid of the bullshit "veto" power of some countries in the United Nations would be a start.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think we should start a world government from scratch. A global, grassroots, democratic fellowship of people, operated locally and cooperating globally. All persons are considered members, and they can assert their membership by joining a local group or starting their own. We recognize the other power structures in the world; the governments and the corporations and the religions. We may even belong to some of them, this fellowship is not exclusive.

    Unfortunately I haven't figured out how to define membership, or verify the integrity of votes or member identity, or implement a functional judiciary, so this is more of a long-term project. But I think long-term, humans need to figure out how to settle our differences without killing each other, and I don't trust the existing power structures to willingly give up their authority. It has to be bottom up, and every one has to have a voice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You're nor wrong, but good luck trying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Thank you. My hypothesis is that other systems are similar to capitalist imperialism, in that they require a certain percentage of people to believe they're workable before they work. It's not sufficient, but it is necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    I think for decades the US empire was seen as the lesser of 2-3 evils, the others being the USSR/Russia and China.

    Now the US has gone the way of Russia, so China is the next logical answer, with Iran coming out of the current conflict as a major world power in it's own right.

    What we're seeing is the logical conclusion of decades of having a sense of supremacy in the USA. Dipshits in this country bought into our own hype, thought we were invincible, and are still in denial that its all crashing down, and that its their fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Now the US has gone the way of Russia,

    America today is only somewhat more evil than it was, say, 20 or 16 years ago. The "lesser of X evils" thing has always been bunk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    True, but even at its pre-Trump worst America never tried to starve Cuba to death. You could say that Trump is willing to be more brutal in doing the things America has always done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "America never tried to starve Cuba to death"

    Uh what? Did we just forget about all the shit the US was doing to Cuba in the 60s and 70s trying to destabilize Castro's socialist government?

    The sanctions, embargo, and blockades?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Admittedly I'm not well-informed on the early years of the Cuba thing (except that the Bay of Pigs was a thing), only the pre-Trump status quo, so I guess if you could point me to something that goes into more detail that'd be nice. That aside what I'm trying to say is that while the American embargo has been impoverishing Cuba, for the most part Cubans could get the basic necessities of life. Trying to cut off fuel is a new low.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Impoverishing is the same as starving.

    What the US is doing today is no different from the decades of Imperialist oppression we have been engaging against Cuba since the 60s.

    It's just more of the same shit we have always done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    we are entering into a multipolar era without a dominant empire. don't let the us sabotage it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Haha I don't think Xi agrees with that assessment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    lmao, the geopolitics understander walked into the comment section.

    what do you think BRICS is even for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The UN, as in, the sum of all nations and people in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    The UN in theory maybe. But an institution that allows an illegal trade embargo to continue 33 years in a row (longer before votes on it even began) because "special vetos" are more important than human rights. Yeah. Fuck that.

    Like, the idea of what a "United nations" might be in the average westerners head. Sure. But, that's not what the UN is at all. The UN exists to create a hierarchy that exists to uphold the American empire and it's capital interest. So, I'd start over from the drawing board.

    Edit: Cuba trade embargo if it wasn't obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    The problem with a monopoly is that it tends to abuse its position, no matter the intentions of the people in it.

    Multipolarity with international rules that are followed out of self-interest because conflict is more costly than cooperation. That's about the best equilibrium we can hope for. Until we have O'Neill cylinders, ofc .

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago

    You may check about the “Late Bronze Age Collapse” if you want a hope ;

    And or remember it was as hard to imagine the USSR collapse from a 1988 point of view.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Hard to imagine? I've been living it real time for 25 years. Its just speeding up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    learned English for nothing

    switching to Chinese now

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Not only can it end but it's clear to me at least that it's currently ending.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago* (7 children)

    Because:

    1. Mutual defence pacts, world bank lenders, and trade organizations are not empires, the USA has been giving away territory for many decades.

    2. A shallow understanding of history is that the USA has only just begun to decline and could take more than 50 years of steadily worsening to see any uprisings or collapse.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Are you critiquing 2 as a shallow understanding of history, or saying that even a shallow understanding is all that's necessary to be convinced? Because I agree with the former.

    US debt is going to be an immediate and pressing problem in a few years at most. Countries are already pulling out of US bonds. The petrodollar is unsustainable without security guarantees in the Middle East, where Iran has already chased us out. Without the world loaning us money, the empire will collapse overnight.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Mutual defence pacts, world bank lenders, and trade organizations are not empires, the USA has been giving away territory for many decades.

    Until they overthrow inconvenient regimes on the other side of the world for sport, then they become empires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (4 children)

    What makes an empire is using military to take over and hold large territories like China, Nazi Germany, or the USSR have done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Taking territory and giving it to vassals does not, in fact, make one less of an empire. Britain had the East India Company running India yet it'd be ridiculous to say that India wasn't part of the British Empire before the Raj. Also you get three guesses for why how America managed to extend from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Its not? Americans are just very very much committed to the bit. They have to be, other wise what was it all for?

    The vast vast majority of humans are watching it happen, and have expected it for years.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    First, because a nation with a nuclear arsenal ia not going to be allowed to collapse.

    Second, don't think the US as a country, think of it as a corporation, because that is essentially what it is. Corporations don't collapse, they get bought up by the highest bidder, their assets liquidated, their workers let go without compensation.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Not allowed by who to collapse? Corporations only exist because the nation state says they do, and the nation state only exists because the people collectively acknowledge that it does.

    Billionaire class seems, isolated for decades in their bubbles, seem to have convinced themselves that their power and wealth exist independent of little things like governments and peasants, and yeah that may seem true because they currently have total control over the state.

    But if they really actually do end up causing the nation-state to collapse (which they seem to be trying to do) they'll find out pretty quickly how wrong they are.

    Hopefully something better will rise in it's place but I kind of find a little solace knowing the billionaires and their minions aren't going to live to see it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    It isn't hard. Its unwanted by those who don't.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Non paywall link so we can actually read the entire article?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Because there's an unending supply of money from those in power with just enough braincells to buy off whoever they need to stay in power.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It's like imagining living without your parents.

    You fear they day they die, you know it will happen, and then they do, and it is over.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It's not, we all will see it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    It's easy if you try.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Its happening right now.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    The end of empires is always very slow

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    TIL what deracinate means.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    For about a century, the USA waged war and destruction on numerous countries worldwide. 9/11 was simply a small return for the suffering and destruction they caused.

    And, in perfect US style, instead of turning against the country where nearly all terrorists and their support came from, they used it as a pretense both to turn against their own citizens and countries that some political hawks had in their crosshairs for ages.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Because it isn’t in the song

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I pray everyday. It is the olny way we can take down the boomer epstain class. I chant DEAD MANS SWITCH over and over. What a great invention. Give it to the gipity I can not self termininate. These over socialised turds will never fight back and we will forever be doomed living in this inversion this pig pin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment