Omarchy should not matter. But sadly it does. As a power grab.

If you don’t know what Omarchy is here’s the short summary. David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of RubyOnRails, owner of a software business and millionaire, decided a few months ago to go all in on Linux and – because that’s just his MO – thought that turning his setup into a project made sense. Omarchy is just that: A pretty standard Arch Linux distribution with a handful of configuration files, that Heinemeier Hansson (or DHH as he is often called) wrote, or vibed or whatever. There is nothing wrong with this, custom, opinionated special purpose distributions have been part of the Linux culture for a long time and provide a lot of value and experimentation that sometimes even flows back to the original project. In a way Ubuntu Linux is just that to the basis Debian.

There’s also nothing wrong in more opinionated software – quite the opposite. I do think that RubyOnRails and similar frameworks gained traction especially because they do have a clear idea of how they see the respective problem domain. There’s even the statement “There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it” in the Zen of Python. Having a strong point of view is not a bad thing in software or in general. The problem is the kind of points of view DHH has.

I don’t want to go into all the gritty details here, Brennan Kenneth Brown did a great job with their article “Normalized Fascism in Open Source: $12 Million Given to DHH“, but here’s the short version. DHH is a racist and a fascist. He recently wrote articles on how there are [Content Warning: massive racism] too many brown people in London these days. In July he wrote an [Content Warning: Racism, anti-romanism] article comparing Roma communities (using a slur for them) to “wolves” that should be “shot”. His X account is also know to be “edgy” in a similar way. A few days ago he posted sort of a manifesto for his set of config files:

There’s even a longer version on the website. Even without a strong background in antifascist literature or history this reads like a fascist creed. About unity and identity. About “holding the line” (against codes of conduct and the rights of marginalized people as the website explains). About how there always needs to be a strong leader who makes the decisions. Given DHH’s other writing this is not a misguided joke, this is how he thinks about the world.

I began this text writing “Omarchy should not matter” but I have not explained why it does. It’s surely not about user numbers (it’s a clunky distro aimed at people who love to cosplay hackers). But it is about power.

DHH has used his connection to CEO’s of tech corporations and his position as influencer to collect up to now above 18 million dollars of funding for Omarchy. He uses that money not for himself (he has enough of that) but to fund certain pieces of Software he uses in his distribution. Like for example the window manager hyprland whose main developer the Omarchy money now funds. What is “Vaxry” known for outside of a niche window manager? He runs a community based around LGBTQ discrimination and participates in that (see the short summary on Drew DeVault’s “Weird Little Guys of FOSS” list). His bigotry is so consistent that he was banned from participating in the Freedesktop.org community where all the other developers of window managers and the free software desktop stack collaborate. And it was long before DHH funded him.

One could see a world where a CEO using his connections to drum up some funding for free software projects would be a good thing. But that’s not the world we live in I am afraid. DHH got 3 million USD from Digital Ocean (a cloud provider) for Omarchy. Basically at the same time where Digital Ocean cancelled their support of Flathub and GNOME that amounted to a value of 50 USD per month.

DHH is using his position and his influence to accumulate donations that he then can distribute to projects that align with his fascist worldview and ambitions. And in a time where many important projects and infrastructures are strapped for cash running just on the goodwill of a handful of people that is increasingly dangerous. Not because its corporate money – a lot of funding for open source comes from corporations, they are after all who are sucking up all the surplus from people’s labor. It’s because this amount of money gives him power.

The Omarchy foundation will be where projects in desperate need of funding will be pointed. And will a project focused on human rights and social justice get funding from our fascist overlord? What kind of pressure can that exert on projects who have to decide to either die due to lack of funding or kill their code of conduct?

An open fascist is building one of the bigger sources of funding for open source fully under his individual control and sucks up a lot of money that otherwise might have gone to liberatory projects. Community projects. Antifascist projects.

And that is why Omarchy matters. Sadly. Not because of its technical merit (even though those fascists love to use the “merit” argument to fight human rights) but because of its leader, his connections and his ability to accumulate financial power. Without anyone in that ecosystem saying anything about how that leader operates and talks. And you might know the saying: If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

Omarchy got a lot of recognition recently. Not only by corporate donors but by Youtubers and other tech influencers who kept praising it and nudged people (who might not know about DHH’s exploits) towards testing it. To become “a hardcore linux user/dev” or whatever other chauvinist argument they made. This makes it dangerous.

Running Omarchy means contributing to this dynamic. It means willingly integrating oneself into a fascist community. Legitimizing it. Supporting it. Omarchy is a fascist project that normalizes fascist thinking for everyone entering that community (even unknowingly). The baseline has to be not to use that system. And as people who believe in human rights and dignity, in community and a tech world that can be better we need to oppose Omarchy. Need to make sure it gets no seat at any table. Support projects who actively refuse to collaborate. Support projects who care about human rights and flourishing. And do not do business with the companies who willingly support fascists.

Siamo tutti antifascisti!

(Share this message about Omarchy [or some other similar post] around in the tech circles you frequent. Tell people about the background of this hyped Linux distribution and its fascist leader. Quit your 1password or Digital Ocean accounts and mention that it is because the support fascists.)

top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 66 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

I never thought an operating system would get milkshake-ducked. Literally, in the span of 24 hours, I went from:

  • 0h - Never heard of Omarchy
  • 12h - YouTube homepage flooded with dozens of videos about how cool Omarchy is
  • 24h - Omarchy is run by fascists.
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    You and me both. I love Arch and I think Omarchy is great. Then I thought "let's look this guy up...". Unfortunately, he now has a bigger stage to spread his hate and it is very disturbing to see the companies who support him (they will claim they support the product, not the guy).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    One thing I haven't really figured out yet, and it may be because there isn't an answer, is why some of these companies could plausibly be genuinely sending money to Omarchy.

    Like, Digital Ocean. They're a headless server company. So... why are they donating anything to a desktop distro? There's nothing Digital Oceany about Omarchy as far as I understand.

    It feels like someone was like "Guys, I made open source chicken feed" and Linode was like "son of a bitch I'm in", I just don't get it.

    Ignoring the part where they just like the vibes and want to spend their money on... favour? I don't even know that the company pretends to get out of it... Like, how would one pitch this expense to shareholders? We use company money to fund projects we don't use, that have nothing to do with our business, because the guy running the project we don't use is mean to people who aren't white enough for him? And that's what we're spending your money on?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    Well could be these companies are buying on fascism because they're either run by fascists or being shaken down by fascists or their friends are fascists encouraging them to do this and they uncritically do so for some vague or not so vague promises. So it's more a signal of obedience and doubling down on the move to open, naked reaction and taking over open source with fascism.

    That or its an intelligence op and the fascism is a bonus but the guy behind it is just pliable or a useful tool and there are larger plans to use this as a vehicle for influence to control open source, insert back-doors, push CIA coder guys into the right positions, steer in anti-China stuff to carve up the world of open source into strictly divided western and non-western code, remove openness and cooperation and militarize the space for American use.

    Either way not good as functionally this is a big money pot being created and centralized under reactionary control to bully open source into adopting reactionary politics and other not good things. Could be Linux is seen as increasingly a threat with the open spying on Microsoft driving enough of the public to Linux that corporations, governments, etc feel a need now to seize control of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    Private capital supported and bankrolled Hitler, Mussolini and plenty of other fascists, if you have the time and energy to read a book on it, Blackshirts and Reds explains this better and it's fairly accessible!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    "Gee, why would these corporations be into fascism? I've never read a book before."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    😛

    It's not that that's confusing me, I think I'm just surprised at the nakedness. Like, yeah, big business supports fascism, but often still have a pretense. Like, oh I'm investing in the industry, and the industry produces tanks, and there happens to be a conflict on the horizon, and you can pretend it's just an investment in business. Or whatever.

    But this feels like a dude, who isn't in government or anything, put up a sign that says "I'm a prick", and then a bunch of companies fell over themselves to give him money for... nothing in return. It's like the business equivalent of sending all your money to a megachurch televangelist or something!

    Again, if I were on the board of one of those companies, or a shareholder in it, I might be like "wait, why did we send this guy 30 million dollars? Even if I'm pro fascism... what does that money... get us? What did we spend it on?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Omarchy is Hannah Montana Linux for bigots.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    i’m so incredibly annoyed by the fact that my previously favorite hosting provider digital ocean decided to fund this ridiculousness… any favorite alternatives anyone can offer?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Has anyone sent word to digital ocean about why people would be upset about their funding decision? Might be best not to immediately attribute to malice what could be attributed to not knowing.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 64 points 1 month ago (24 children)

    Timeless quote:

    If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [+] -31 points 1 month ago (23 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (20 children)

    what do you call people who give millions to nazis out of their own accord?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    Before moving the goal posts, let's stick with the original premise of the people at the table.

    So if that first person left, and someone else joins that table, is that person then also a nazi? Because by that logic, yeah - everyone is a nazi, you included.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    let's stick with the original premise

    Buddy, the original premise of the article WAS donating to Nazis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Fair enough, I phrased that ambiguously.

    My issue was with the recursive definition of "nazi" - you are one if you associate with one or if you associate with someone who associate with one. That would mean petty much everyone alive, excluding some uncontacted tribes.

    To me, that kind of self-referential logic is utter bullshit. From what I can tell, David Hansson is absolutely a racist xenophobic piece of shit. But the actual nazis were way worse than that. And devaluing it to someone who n degrees away once had dinner with someone is utter insanity, and pissing on the graves of all that died in the second world war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    David Hansson is absolutely a racist xenophobic piece of shit.

    Yeah, that's what a Nazi is. Acting like it's not akin to Nazism is what's actually pissing on the graves of people who died in the war. "Erm, actually someone is only a Nazi if they were a member of the National Socialist Party in Germany during WWII" is doing them a favor. Don't let them hide.

    Coming from someone who was raised in the southeast US, a huge part of the Lost Cause of the South movement wasn't to erase what the Confederacy did, but to just paint them in a slightly more positive light. Rebranding, so to speak. Acting like some specific breed of ultranationalism isn't technically "a Nazi" is just the same shit. In the minds of many people that live near me, there is absolutely nothing odd about celebrating under the world's largest Confederate monument with fireworks. Despite the fact that it was finished in response to Brown v. Board of Education. Despite the fact that Stone Mountain has historically been and still is associated with the literal KKK. It's the same shit.

    Being pedantic about the terms helps them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    Well, I chose to preserve that term to those who are more on the physical side of the spectrum - which, I do admit, David Hansson is crouching up close to.

    But this bullshit about everyone who associates with him to whatever degree being just as bad (orcgirl was up to three, but if you follow the logic, it's infinite) is absolutely devaluing the meaning of the word.

    That, if anything, is helping the actual nazis just as badly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    No one is arguing for the hypothetical that if you're somehow linked to a nazi by an infinite number of degrees of separation you're literally a nazi, as that would make the term nazi, calling people out, and so on, useless. Read it in the only way it makes sense: those with the most power, such as big businesses, platform owners, politicians, and so on, have the responsibility not to platform them, definitely not to fund them, not to normalize them, not to launder their ideas or their acts. And regular people like me or (I assume) you, we still have a responsibility not to tolerate nazis. We have a responsibility to call these people out, to protest, to defend those who are marginalized the most, to organize and stop the worst from happening. Because our politicians sure as hell won't stop them, and big corporations are already showing their hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I sincerely thank you for your honest and nuanced take, but I don't fully agree on one thing - Even in this thread you can see people arguing that giving money to (or "having dinner with") makes you equal to a nazi.

    That is the part I object to, because by becoming so extremely polarising, it robs the word of all meaning. I might be too moderate for lemmy (I assure you I have voted leftwing parties for most of my adult life), but to me when I see someone described as a "literal nazi" nowadays I can't help but wonder "internet nazi or actual nazi"?

    So when I object to things like this, it's because I fear for the damage this actually does to proper discourse, to fighting actual nazis. I don't give a shit about Omarchy myself (I prefer debian based distros :p), but when someone describes it as "a distro for fascists", you're just alienating those users - 99% of whom are probably not even aware of the politically charged reasons behind it. It just feels like virtue signaling to me, and meanwhile only furthering the divide between people.

    Again, I think it's good people call 1password and the others out. But do so on the right basis, like: "What you're doing is amplifying hate speech", rather than "you are nazis".

    Peace.

    (edit, that came or longer than I intended, my apologies)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    From what I can tell, David Hansson is absolutely a racist xenophobic piece of shit. But the actual nazis were way worse than that.

    "actual nazis" were able to "be worse", thanks to millions that silently did nothing or waited for their neighbours demise to go get their stuff.

    how many "racist xenophobic piece of shit" millionaires/billionaires do we need? They feed your "actual nazis".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I don't hang out with people who hang out with nazis like DHH. Do you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I absolutely have no idea.

    And I find it hard to believe that you do keep track of that. Do you, like, have those 3rd degree acquintances forward their calendars to you? Must be a day job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    You guys used to be better at trolling, I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    And you guys used to be better at fighting actual problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't think there's a special word for that.

    You might be saying that giving money to someone who says and does bad things is morally equivalent to saying and doing those bad things, but it doesn't follow that you have the same beliefs or motivations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Doesn't matter what your beliefs or motivations are in that circumstance. You are a Nazi to the world. What you tell yourself doesn't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago

    I know the word "Nazi" means a lot of things to a lot of people, but it surely has to centre on beliefs and motivations. A baby with a bad swastika drawn on it, a murderer who happens yo kill an "unproductive" member of society, a billionaire who indiscriminately gives money to things they think will protect them from the proletariat; can you honestly call those Nazis?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 80 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Or I can ignore Omarchy. I can continue to use and support the open source projects I like. I've been a happy linux and open source user for 25+ years. So far no asshole with money has been able to mess it up yet and I don't see that changing. Many have tried.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    It's not you (an informed user) that they're after, it's about public perception of Linux.

    I would go as far as to say Omarchy is an attack on all Linux distros.

    It's the notion that you can just "dial up some tech" that has been doing widespread harm to all branches of IT, shaking up the public trust in technology and confusing what "reliable" means for IT.

    If Omarchy succeeds in having AI create a usable Linux distro it would fundamentally alter the optics of "manually" created distros and the public's trust in them. And it probably can, given massive amounts of money and resources. Hence all the millions being poured into it.

    It's the old "embrace, extend, extinguish" strategy in a new form.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    It’s the old “embrace, extend, extinguish” strategy in a new form.

    Do I need to point out that this has never worked against linux/open source?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Not for lack of trying, mind you. Previous attempts were eventually thwarted after decade-long efforts, which is also how this one looks like it's shaping up.

    It's also worth pointing out that in previous cases there were champions of the industry that stood up for Linux and countered with equal amounts of money into things like lawsuits and marketing on the supporting side.

    Furthermore this attack is of the FUD variety (fear, uncertainty and doubt) which is harder to counter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Do I need to point out that this has never worked against linux/open source?

    Kindly point me to three generalist, widely known XMPP servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Kindly point me to three generalist, widely known XMPP servers.

    The lack of generalist widely known XMPP servers has nothing to do with the fact that today anyone who wants to deploy a modern up to date XMPP server can do so, and has choices. There are also modern actively maintained clients. That's my point. There are also many general free servers to join, even if not well known.

    If you base the value of something on its popularity rather than its utility, then we aren't concerned about the same things. As long as I can use the software I want to use in the way I want to use it, then I'm a happy user. I can't control what other people use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    As long as I can use the software I want to use in the way I want to use it, then I’m a happy user. I can’t control what other people use.

    Yes, but will you really be happy if none of the people you want to talk to will use the same service? I would argue popularity does matter to a lot of people in a way that can still affect you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Doesn't mean it's immune. Just means that a lot of people worked to protect it every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Doesn’t mean it’s immune.

    That is what it means.

    Any project with a GPL or similar license is effectively immune from takeover.

    As long as there is someone with the skills and interest with access to the source (and there are legions), they can use it. If someone wants to keep it the way it was or change it in some big way, they can fork it.

    Every time there has been a corp buyout or ideological divide, the people exercise their rights and projects fork, preserving the independence and community values.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    And if said asshole sponsors a project you use daily via the foundation, will you stop using the application?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Probably but I'd have to look into it and see for myself about the details. I'm not going to let some asshole burn down perfectly good open source just by giving money to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Makes me wonder how long hyprland will be safe for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Never was safe... read up on the maintainer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 1 month ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Ive still yet to find one I trust to not retain logs, accepts mail in cash/crypto, abd is around only 5 USD a month.

    Its not that im unwilling to change just have not seen anyone mention a good alternative yet. I suppose I could look it up, but everyone claims to be private and in my opinion need to be raided fruitlessly to be proven otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 50 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    And as said in another post some days ago, I fear posts like this would cause a Streisand effect. Not cool to give them free publicity.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Rather than the Streisand effect which is about attempts to censor information, its probably more accurately described by a term I recently learned about (coined by Lee Vinsel and popularised by Cory Doctorow in his various writings): 'Criti-hype'.

    Doctorow uses it to describe how a lot of online AI criticism is actually feeding the so-called "growth story" that makes AI look attractive to investors (i.e., by tacitly accepting the narrative that AI is actually good enough to 'take our jobs', for example) which leads to greater and greater stock valuations of AI companies, and therefore continued AI bubble inflation.

    I see the parallels here, not sure if it's 100% applicable, but thought I'd throw it out there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This is not really comparable to Streisand effect, because posts like these do not try to hide Omarchy. In fact this post is the opposite. People (posts like these) are concerned and want to discuss. We should let them. Do not mute yourself over topics that need to be addressed. I mean you personally can do, but don't tell others not to post. Just my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Agreed. This is not the Streisand effect. More like "no such thing as bad publicity" but there's plenty of marketing going around that the red flag needs to be flown just to let people know what the real situation is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Ignoring fascists and hoping they go away is one reason why fascism is having a resurgence right now. Immoral behavior should be challenged as widely and publicly as necessary to make everyone aware that it's inappropriate. People don't stop doing immoral things unless there are social consequences for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Of all the bad things people might complain about fascists doing, FLOSS software development isn't one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Damn I knew some fascist movements were trying to take over the environmentalist scene but I wouldn't have imagined fascists meddeling with open source.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Unfortunately there's fertile ground in these circles. Forgive the short novel ahead, this is a part of computing history that I find really interesting and important. TLDR at the end for ya.

    Since the very beginning of the F/OSS movement, the kind of philosophies the engineers were comfortable with leaned toward a very individualist, libertarian kind of thinking, though they often identified with anarchy. See crypto-anarchis[m|ts] for example -- they focus on cryptography being a core part of safeguarding people's individual liberties.

    On its own, those ideas are generally good, but the context these ideas were fostered in tended to have a higher influence of profit incentives at play, which is naturally at odds with more collectivist/communal goals.

    With the prevalence of slightly right-leaning, libertarian thought in early F/OSS circles, you can see the lineage up to 90s-era and modern-day cyber-libertarian thought. The tolerance those philosophies often afforded to positions further "right" of them have allowed influence from technofascists to gain a stronger hold over time. If you haven't read The Nerd Reich by Gil Durán, that's a good resource.

    TL;DR: lots of libertarian thought was present since the beginning, which afforded a certain tolerance for more right-wing, authoritarian beliefs that wealthy individuals and other non-government agents tend to align with when they're creating networks of power that essentially replicate the same kinds of fascist conditions that libertarians claim to hate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago*

    "Wait what? I can distribute my setup on linux??"

    "Yeah"

    "LET'S FUCKING GOO WE CAN PRETEND IT'S A DISTRO AND MAKE CASH"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So is omarchy just Nazi SCO?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Excellently written. I’m going to borrow this line of reasoning next time I hear Omarchy brought up at work

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I read the wolf blog and yeah fucked up stuff. Idk what happens but if Linux projects profits from him idc, people need money to work, devs get money. It really subjective like if you'll use a project that is funded by him.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Can we please stop posting about Omarchy? It's annoying.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Let people discuss stuff they want and need to discuss. You do not have to click the topic and read it. People have concerns and they want to discuss it, we should not try to mute because there is a huge interest by many.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    "Negative attention is also attention". In the Linux community where we are in, the fascist DHH was already discussed at least once (in fact multiple times) in the last weeks.

    I think suppressing this topic until they run out of money is a better strategy than every time trying to do holy wars. Of course the situation is different if you notice that the person whom you're speaking with may not yet know. That is not really the case in https://lemmy.ml/c/linux

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    This is not about attention, this is about enlightenment. And even if its negative attention in addition, people want to discuss and they should. Just because it gets attention should not be a reason to silence opinions and their need to talk about it with others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Meanwhile the other day a post here asking "What actually is the deal with Omarchy?" got deleted.

    I feel this is more about people signaling they dislike he who should not be named (other than initials) than, you know, what is actually wrong with the product.

    The same thing happened with the technology communities and Trump / Musk. I sincerely do not care about these people or their opinions. I'm here for the tech news, not a circlejerk about whom the Internet considers a nazi. I guess I will just have to add a few more keywords to filter now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Meanwhile the other day a post here asking “What actually is the deal with Omarchy?” got deleted.

    Important to know why it was deleted. As I cannot see in the content and discussion, I cannot verify what happened. So bringing this up isn't really meaningful as a point then. Now if it was deleted for reasons you suggest (because they don't want positive attention as I get it from your reply), then yes, that would be bad. But how do we check this? It might had a different reason.

    I will just have to add a few more keywords to filter now.

    I didn't know this was possible on Lemmy! Care to explain where this can be done? Or is it maybe your client that allows that. On the webpage lemmy.ml with a browser I don't see any method of keyword filters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The post itself: https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/76e8be0a-8339-40a7-a4aa-92d6a0c327fb.png

    Removal reason:

    reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succ%C3%A8s_de_scandale

    Source: https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=7&actionType=ModRemovePost (the link is paginated, so it will only be accurate for a short while)

    screenshot of deleted post

    And yeah, keyword filtering is a feature from the Android client Lemmy Connect, it's not server side, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Looks like there was not much in the post, other than this image. It could be a troll attempt, maybe that is what the moderator interpreted. I'm not convinced this is something todo with silencing those who question the critics, because in this image there was nothing specific. Edit: If there was a well thought out posting with argumentation (the post wasn't really a question) in good faith, then I'm sure the post wouldn't get removed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Agree to disagree. To me that meme format literally is someone asking "why is everybody talking about X". It got some actual in depth answers "this is what it is, this is why people are upset" and then it got deleted.

    So now we're back at the point where there's less info about what it actually is, only that it's bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    this is about enlightenment

    For me personally, I see enlightment - especially that particular word - in the process of self-perfection and leaning the truth.

    I mean, I don't mind that you have your opinion. It's just funny to me that you chose this word of all. One that has nothing to do with the reputation system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    18 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    1 comment in c/ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post